tv Situation Room With Wolf Blitzer CNN October 13, 2017 2:00pm-3:00pm PDT
bourdain's exploring lagos in "parts unknown" 9:00 p.m. eastern only here on cnn. be sure to tune into sunday morning's "state of the union." my guest will be rex tillerson. it all starts at 9:00 a.m. and again at noon. that is it for "the lead." turning you over to wolf blitzer in "the situation room." thanks for watching. happening now. raw deal. president trump accuses iran of cheating on its agreement to stop pursuing nuclear weapons each though top members of his own administration say that isn't the case. tonight, he's forcing congress to make the next move. will the president's refusal to certify iran's compliance open the way to a better deal or isolate the united states? raising premiums? in his most direct assault now on obamacare, president trump puts a stop to subsidies designed to help millions of lower income americans afford insurance. he calls the money payouts to insurance companies. but will people who voted for
the president now see their health care costs soar by thousands of dollars? no conspirecy. the sheriff leading the investigation into the las vegas massacre angrily denies allegations of incompetence. he also reveals the killer targeted police and revises the timeline of what happened and when. but are we any closer to understanding why he opened fire on thousands of concertgoers? and high winds -- forecasters now fear 60-mile-an-hour winds will push california's wild fire noose more neighborhoods. with the death toll rising and hundreds listed as missing, could california's worst wildfire season get even worse this weekend? i'm wolf blitzer. you're in "the situation room." this is cnn breaking news. we're following multiple breaking stories as president trump took major steps to keep
his campaign promise, rolling back significant parts of former president obama's legacy. this afternoon, the president announced he will not certify that iran is complying with terms of the nuclear deal negotiated during the obama administration. he stopped short of pulling the united states out of the multinational agreement, but accused iran of violating the deal's spirit and some of its provisions. the president's actions are drawing anger in iran and pushback from russia. also this afternoon, the president told democrats, and i'm quoting now, come to me and negotiate on health care. his demand comes as his administration stopped reimbursing insurance companies for providing lower cost, lower deductible obamacare policies to millions of lower income americans. angry democrats accuse the president of deliberately sabotaging the affordable care act that he failed to get congress to repeal and replace. also breaking. in a defensive and emotional news conference, the sheriff leading the investigation into
the las vegas mass shooting clarifies the timeline of what happened once again and says the killer targeted police. the sheriff also says he is absolutely offended by allegations his investigation is incompetent. meanwhile, president trump's budget director, mick mulvaney, is here with me in "the situation room." we'll take our questions about obamacare and more and our advertisements have full coverage of today's top stories. let's start with jim acosta. jim, the president is trying to live up to his campaign promises by taking down two major parts of the obama legacy involving health care and the iran nuclear deal. >> that's exactly right, wolf. president trump spent the day chipping away at barack obama's legacy by going after two of the former president's signature achievement, obamacare and as you said the iran nuclear deal. the president defended those decisions as well as handling of puerto rico, claiming that he in fact loves the people on the island.
today, president trump turned his campaign rhetoric into action. threatening to unravel the obama-era iran nuclear deal, but only after he kicks the issue to congress, giving lawmakers a chance to toughen the agreement. if congress fails to act, he warns, he may scrap the deal. >> well, i may do that. i may do that. the deal is terrible. so what we've done is through the certification process, we'll have congress take a look at it and i may very well do that. >> reporter: the president arrived at his policy after senior leaders in his own cabinet pleaded for him to stay in the agreement now. the president was still in a defiant mood, insisting iran had violated the agreement. >> the iranian regime has committed multiple violations of the agreement. >> reporter: just one day after his own secretary of state told reporters, quote, we don't disagree, we don't dispute that iran is under technical compliance. still, the president's move stops well short of his campaign threats to completely pull out of the agreement. >> our leaders never read "the
art of the deal," one of the great books, of course. the iran deal, this recent deal which is a catastrophe. >> reporter: the president is taking dramatic action to undermine another piece of barack obama's legacy, obamacare. ending the payments to insurance companies that help provide health care to lower income enrollees. >> and one by one it's going to come down. >> reporter: mr. trump said his actions won't harm the poor. >> are you concerned about poor people losing health care? >> no, because i think what we'll do is we'll be able to renegotiate so that everybody gets -- we just took care of a big chunk and now we'll take care of the other chunk. what would be nice, if the democratic leaders could come over to the white house, we'll negotiate some deal that's good for everybody. >> reporter: experts say the president's move will hike raesd for both middle class and lower income americans at an estimated cost to the government of more than $7 billion next year. the president is acting to dismantle obamacare, even though he said he would let it collapse on its own earlier this year. >> let obamacare fail.
it will be a lot easier. and i think we're probably in that position where we'll just let obamacare fail. >> reporter: holding an impromptu mini news conference on the south lawn of the white house -- president also defended his actions in puerto rico, including his tweets slamming local leaders on the island, as well as his warning that assistance won't last forever. >> and saying you won't stay there forever. >> we've done a great job. >> you say it about texas and louisiana -- >> we've done a great job in puerto rico. puerto rico has to get the infrastructure going. we're helping them with their infrastructure. >> reporter: now, as for the iran deal, there are mixed messages coming from the administration. while the president said today that he may end up cancelling the agreement altogether, secretary of state rex tillerson told reporters that the u.s. would remain in the deal in congress does nothing. it's unclear republican lawmakers will be able to find the votes on iran when they have failed to act on so many other fronts. wolf?
>> jim acosta at the white house, thanks very much. we're going to have much more on the iran deal in a few moments, but first, let's get to president's moves to change the affordable care act, obamacare. despite the president's call for democrats to come and negotiate about health care, they're furious right now about his refusal to pay the obamacare subsidies. house democratic leader nancy pelosi is accusing the president of the united states of deliberately forcing up the cost of health insurance. >> make no mistake, last night the president single-handedly decided to raise america's health premiums for no reason except spite and cruelty. >> our congressional correspondent phil mattingly is up on capitol hill. phil, despite republicans' total contempt for obamacare, is it possible they may take action to undo what the president has actually done today? >> reporter: it certainly is, wolf, and that's because of the republican conference. it is not unified on this issue specifically. now, absolutely, they are opposed to obamacare. they want to repeal and replace
the law, even though they haven't figured out a way to do that legislatively yet. but when it comes to the payments, when it comes to these subsidies, a lot of republicans, including high-ranking republicans, like lamar alexander, house ways and means committee chairman kevin brady say these subsidies are necessary so long as obamacare is the law and a fix is needed. wolf, republican leaders at least publicly haven't tipped there hands on what their next step is. several aides told me this has led to an extremely complicated process going forward. on the policy, they are very cognisant of what this could do to insurance markets and individuals who receive subsidies through obamacare, specifically to their premiums. on the politics, there is also a recognition as you heard from leader nancy pelosi, democrats are absolutely going to say this has to be in any spending deal or any newt gingrich deal before the end of the year, and they recognize for their members, the policy and the politics, this is going to be very complicated. keep in mind, wolf, they have a very complicated next ten weeks already on the schedule.
this only adds to that. >> certainly does. phil, was this move by the president done in concert with republicans up on capitol hill where you are? did they know this was coming? lawmakers will have to take action even though they have had some trouble doing much so far. >> reporter: wolf, i'm told that this was a complete surprise to several if not all republican leaders here on capitol hill. many of them reading about it before hearing anything from the administration. look, keep in mind, house republicans in 2014 actually launched the lawsuit that found these subsidies were unconstitutional. they should be appropriated by congress. they are opposed to the subsidies, but implicitly, they were more than willing to accept the administration continuing to pay them until they found a pathway forward. now as i noted, the idea that the administration would move forward on this not flag this for congressional leaders heading into this kind of very contentious debate has created all sorts of complications here as they try and almost thread the needle here on an issue that has already divided their conference, and as they are very
cognisant of, could create major problems insurance markets, which could have a fallout on the policy side and the political side, wolf. >> certainly could.
phil mattingly up on capitol hill, thanks so much. joining us here in "the situation room" is president's budget director mick mulvaney. director mulvaney, thanks for joining us. >> wolf, thank you very much for having me. >> the criticism you're getting, not just from democrats but even republicans who are telling you, you just heard this comes as a surprise, that this step to remove these subsidies is going to wind up hurting a whole bunch of people who wound up voting for the president of the united states. their premiums are going to skyrocket as a result of this. >> i had a chance to watch the presentation, and it was interesting they used the same language, subsidies to people, subsidies to folks. that's not what these are, wolf. if you follow the money here, which is what we do at the office of management and budget. these are checks from the treasury to some of the largest health insurance companies in the country. that's what this was. this was not a subsidy to you or me or anyone else. >> all these subsidies are designed to subsidize premiums
for individuals. and. >> and those companies are already required by law to keep the premiums at a certain level. what this was was essential a pay-off to the insurance companies to support obamacare in the first place back if 2009/2010. it's been a terrible policy. only at the very end of the last segment that you saw was the comment about how they're unconstitutional. this money was never appropriated. i was in the house in 2014 when i voted to give paul ryan the ability to file a lawsuit on this because these monies -- >> but aren't you concerned if you remove these subsidies a lot of these big insurance companies are going to pull out and not provide any insurance to these individuals? it's going to -- the competition is going to go way, way down. some people won't be able to get anything. >> i absolutely welcome the left, the democratic party to the conversation about what it's like to have insurance companies pull out on states -- >> these are republicans who are worried about that. >> the point of the matter, though, is it seems like the democrats were not very concerned about premiums going up when they went up because of obamacare in the first place. they weren't very concerned about bare counties back when we
had them. these payments are payments to insurance companies. i cannot believe that nancy pelosi was just on your screen there defending bailout payments to large corporations. typically the democrats are against that. it's sort of like the shoe is on the other foot here. the bottom lionel is these are bad policy and the payments are not appropriate. >> once again, they're designed as subsidies to help with the premium for individuals, the premiums are going to go up if the subsidies go away. the other criticism is that the president is doing this because he wants to see obamacare fail. >> zen, the president doesn't want to write a check of your and my tax money to these large health insurance companies that are making hundreds of millions of dollars. let's be perfectly clear, these companies have done extraordinarily well since obamacare became the law of the land. and the president didn't want to simply stand by and see that continue to happen. that, married to the fact that these are unappropriated payments, and you and i know what that means, it means congress made no appropriation for this. the department of justice came out with a letter earlier this week, said they can no longer
defend the obama position these are legal payments and we had to stop them. >> does the president want to see obamacare fail? >> i think the president, along with most of us, know that obamacare is failing on its own and didn't need any help to do so. we've made this decision because it was bad policy. >> this will speed it up? >> it was going fast enough as it is. if you're willing to admit to me here tonight that obamacare is going to fail and we need to repeal and replace it, i'll agree with your problemis the congressional budget office said says it's relatively stable right now. let me read to you what the president tweeted this morning. the democrats' obamacare is imploding. massive payments to their pet insurance companies has stopped. dems should call me to fix. all right, if they call the president to fix, is he willing to sit down with nancy pelosi, chuck schumer, the democratic leadership, the republican leadership and come up with a plan to fix the problems of the affordable care act but stop short of repealing it? >> i think that word depends on who you're talking to.
we are interested in repealing obamacare and replacing it with something -- >> you're not going to have a chance to do that, at least according to the legislative director at the white house, mark short, who was here yesterday, until at least the spring of next year. that will be the first time you'll have a chance to repeal and replace. in the intermediate time, direct mulvaney, are you willing to sit down with the democrats and come up with some improvements that both sides can agree on? >> if it's better for the american people and it's better for the public, it's better for health care in this nation, why would the democrats be against it just because it repeals obamacare? because his name is on the front part of that. >> you know they're not going to accept anything that repeals obamacare. >> why not? >> that's their position. >> and it is. if you ask them why -- >> they say they're willing to fix. they're willing to improve it. you have a republican senator, lamar alexander, patty murray, a democrat, they're working to try to fix it right now, stopping short of repealing and replacing. are you willing to go along with
lamar alexander and patty murray? >> my understanding, and i could have this wrong, but my understanding of the lamar alexander/patty murray bill was to simply appropriate these unappropriated payments. appropriate or legalize -- >> improve the current system. >> to fix the problem. >> would you go along with lamar alexander on that? >> i think i've said a couple of times if it's just a clean bill. the only thing congress can do is force the administration to bail out these insurance companies, the answer is no. if they're interested in talking about health care more widely, to fix it in the democrats word, to repeal it in our words, absolutely, yes, the president is willing to work with anyone who wants to work with him. >> democrats should call me to fix. apparently had a pretty good dinner not too long ago with chuck and nancy as he likes to call them. are you confident that something with the democrats can be worked out in the interim? >> i was the the dinner, the chuck and nancy chinese food dinner. i'm absolutely confident something could get done on daca because the president wants to
see it, so many people do. >> on the d.r.e.a.m.ers. what about health care? >> they are two entirely different things. on health care, president's interested in making this system better. we call that repeal and replace. it's what we want to do. if anybody wants to help us do that, that's fine. >> the president has promised, as you know repeatedly, cheaper, better health care. the congressional budget office estimates premiums will rise 20% on average for what's called the silver level plan in 2018. is the president keeping his promise? >> fascinated how they could do that so quickly, yet they can't score graham/cassidy in a month when we give it to them. that's a different story entirely. this didn't get discussed in the opening segment of the show. the president took sweeping actions to lower premium for millions of americans. the associated health plans, the short-term limited plans, other things we're doing in the executive order will dramatically lower problems on folks. it's what the president wants to do. the reason we took the action today we did on the csr payments, the cost-sharing
reduction payments, they were terrible policy giving money to companies that don't need it. >> we covered that extensively with the president when he announced he signed that executive order. what will the president say to the millions of americans potentially out there, and you're familiar, a former member of congress, whose premiums are about to go up as a result of the decision. he had the justice department take today. >> keep in mind, most of the insurance companies, in fact, think the only exception is in south dakota, north dakota and arizona. most of the insurance companies who filed their proposed rates for next year have already assumed these payments are not being made. there is not going to be any additional increase. >> you don't think premiums will go up for a lot of americans as a result of this? >> premiums are already going up. premiums have gone up every single year under obamacare. if insurance companies want to raise their rates because they're no longer getting a bailout, that's their problem. >> before i let you go, you're the budget direct. tax cuts, that's a big proposal the president wants to move forward. when you were a member of congress, i remember this well,
you were a deficit hawk. the congressional budget office now estimating if these proposed tax cuts, the tax reform that the president is putting forward go up, it could increase the deficit by trillions, trillions of dollars. are you ready to accept that? >> i'm not familiar with that. i've seen the report from the tax policy center. i didn't realize the cbo scored the this yet. >> they haven't yet but there is a preliminarily effort that it could be trillions of dollars. >> their job is to score proposed legislation. there hasn't been any proposed legislation. keep in mind, the senate instructions on the budget, the senate i think will take up the end of next week, will cap that potential impact on the deficit of $1.5 trillion. >> are you ready to go with $1.5 billion increase in the national debt, the deficit, if your legislation goes through? >> i've said many, many times the only way we're going to balance the budget in the current atmosphere in washington, d.c., is fiscal restraint, plus economic growth. that's what we think --
>> $1.5 trillion, you're willing to see it go up $1.5 trillion? >> if you're 30 years old -- >> when you were in congress, you wouldn't accept that. >> if you're 30 years old and watching this program, wolf, you've never lived and worked in this country with a healthy economy. it's a tremendous wealth creating machine for the rich, the middle class and the poor alike. we will do everything we can to get back to that. if that means taking short-term increases in deficits, yes? >> you're willing to go along with it. a lot of republicans in the house and senate say they want tax cuts but they want it to be deficit neutral. they don't want to see $1.5 trillion increase to pay for these tax cuts. >> i'm not the only deficit hawk who wants to see growth and willing to incur short-term deaf sets to get that. balance the budget, it's what happened in the 1990s. slower growth in government expenditures and tremendous economic growth. that's how we balanced the budget in the past. that's how we're going to do it
again. >> one final question on health care. as you saw the polls, more americans thought obamacare was working. they didn't necessarily like -- and the numbers that they supported obamacare repeal and replace. are you willing to keep on pushing for repeal and replace, even though a minority of americans say that's the way to go? >> i'd love to see a poll of people on obamacare. when i was in congress, i was on obamacare and it was terrible. i lost my doctor, my wife lost their iter, my kids lost their doctor. our premiums went up. our co-pays went up. it cost us a fortune to be on that program. it cost us tens of thousands of dollars. >> at least they have some insurance, isn't that good? >> 28 people don't have insurance despite obamacare. which is why what we did yesterday was so important. >> ha lot of work you need to d. you agree with the legislative director of the white house, it's not going to happen, repeal and replace, at least until spring of next year. >> i think that's probably fair. if the senate wants to pass it next week, they're welcome to.
i don't think
that's going to happen. >> they had plenty of opportunities. didn't happen yet. thanks very much for coming in. the director of the office of management and budget. up next, will the democrats take up the president's offer to negotiate on health care? i'll ask democratic congressman ruben gallego whose home state has seen a dramatic inspike in obamacare premiums. more details about president trump's charge that iran is violating both the spirit and the terms of the deal on its nuclear program. >> finally, we will deny the regime all paths to a nuclear weapon.
have you ever stayed with choice hotels? like at a comfort inn? yep. free waffles, can't go wrong. i like it. promote that guy. get the lowest price on our rooms, guaranteed. when you book direct at choicehotels.com. book now. something we all think about as we head into retirement. it's why brighthouse financial is committed to help protect what you've earned and ensure it lasts. introducing shield annuities, a line of products that allow you to take advantage of growth opportunities. while maintaining a level of protection in down markets. so you can head into retirement with confidence. talk with your advisor about shield annuities from brighthouse financial established by metlife.
we're following multiple breaking stories over at the white house where president trump is trying to fulfill two major campaign promises to take down barack obama's legacy. this afternoon, he refused to certify that iran is complying with the nuclear deal negotiated during the obama administration and after stopping payments designed to help lower income americans afford obamacare insurance policies, the president called on democrats to negotiate with him about health care. joining us now, democratic congressman ruben gallego of arizona. he's a member of the armed services committee. congressman, thanks very much for joining us. you just heard the budget director mick mulvaney make his case why what the president is doing on health care, we'll start with health care, is the right thing to do. let me get your reaction. >> well, first of all, it's not based on any type of legislative reality. republicans have full control of the house, the senate and the presidency. and they couldn't even get their own bill for repeal and replace through. now they expect the democrats to
come and bail them out. the problem is that this is their doing. the president broke. this is now trumpcare and dmou now he has to work with us to fix it. we're going to make sure more americans are covered and not less. certainly not going to do it with a gun to our head. so i think the president and mr. mulvaney really need to get with reality and realize what they did. because of their ego and wanted to fulfill a campaign promise, they raised premiums of millions of americans, essentially a tax on working class americans that did not exist yesterday. >> let's be specific, congressman, what does it mean for your constituents, families in arizona, who are eligible for these subsidized premiums? >> well, first of all, arizona is in a tougher position because we had assumed our insurance agencies had assumed we would have the subsidies going throughout the year and they adjusted the premiums to that assumption. now premiums are definitely going to go up. secondly, without the subsidies
that used to be able to compensate for rising premiums, many of my arizona citizens are basically going to go without. according to the cbo, next year, 1 million americans are going to have less health insurance. and that was just at the sign of the pen of the president because of his actions, his reckless actions, 1 million americans will not have health insurance. >> even before the president -- >> many of those will be from arizona. >> even before the president did anything, what, premiums for those on obamacare, the affordable care act, in your state, arizona, went up 100%. >> certainly they've been going up and we have seen that in arizona for a couple of years. at the same time, the subsidies that were being provided were helping a lot of these working class americans to actually pay for that health insurance. and at the end of the day, we had seen the curtailing of the premiums, in terms of how fast it was going up year by year. last year, it was up to 6%, this year we anticipated 3%, now that's going to change because of the rash action by the president.
>> the president tweeted this this morning. i'll read it. the democrats' obamacare is imploding. massive subsidy payments to their pet insurance companies has stopped. dems should call me to fix. are you ready, you and your democratic colleagues, to call the president to fix obamacare, improve it and make it better for millions of americans? >> look, we always have been. if you look at what was going on in the senate, we had senator lamar alexander pushing a bipartisan bill to actually help stabilize the markets. the democrats have offered many, many amendments to the affordable health care act to improve it. first of all, we don't actually understand what the president wants. to begin with, the president doesn't understand insurance policy, doesn't understand health insurance. from conversations we've heard with other members of congress, he's more interested in the headline of repeal and replace than the actual substance of policy. at the end of the day, we're going to do whatever we can to improve our health care system and bring down costs. we can start by having a bipartisan agreement in bringing
down the cost of prescriptions. something i think the president has talked about but done no action. if the government competed and made prescription companies compete for government contracts, we'd save billions and billions of dollars and bring down the health care costs of millions of americans. of course, this president really is all talk and no action and, again, he's expecting congress to fulfill his promises because he doesn't have the power you are nor the wherewithal to do it himself. >> mark short told me and our viewers that the administration, his words, has the commitment for the votes to try another repeal and replacement of obamacare next spring, the spring of 2018. but not necessarily before then. what do you make of that? >> well, you know, i would be shocked that they would be dumb enough to make a move like that in an election year. many of them members already feel -- especially in congress, many moderate republicans feel burned that they were expected to walk the plank by speaker ryan with no end result at the
end. now subsidies are going to be going up, many republicans are going to be associated with trumpcare and the rising premiums that come with it. the only way forward really is to work with us in a bipartisan way to improve obamacare, whatever they want to call it, and not actually try to destroy it. if you actually want to try to raise, you know, the, quote, unquote, premium tax on working class americans in an election year, you're welcome to do that. i'll gladly be in the majority again. >> one final question, congressman, before i let you go, i know you're a military veteran. you're a member of the armed services committee. in your opinion, what are the repercussions of the president's decision not to certify the iran nuclear deal and in effect throw all of this, the controversy, in the lap of congress? >> well, it's deeply irresponsible. first of all, again, to fulfill a campaign and his ego, he went and destroyed a regime, a program that was not the best, but it was definitely doing one thing, which is keeping iran within compliance.
and while i was sitting on the armed services committee, i actually asked secretary -- the secretary of defense whether or not iran was in compliance if he recommended that he stayed within the jcpoa and the secretary of defense, mattis, said, yes, yes, we should. why are we taking these routes? one, it's not for any type of foreign security, but really to fulfill the president's ego. two, it's not really the problem of congress -- the problem is what does this mean for the rest of our partners around the world? it's very difficult to get russia, china, france and now even the european union on board to all agree to one set of standards. and by us pulling out of this, we actually end up isolating ourselves instead of isolating iran. lastly, if we want to actually end up in a peaceful settlement of some sort with our nuclear standoff with north korea, doing these types of actions does not encourage peaceful end to that problem. because why would you deal with the united states if you have an erratic president at any point will basically terminate a
multilateral, multination agreement? that's not rational acting. the united states always needs to be a rational actor on the world stage or else you're going to have a lot of bad outcomes. what the united states congress has to do at this point is fix the irresponsible action
of this administration again. >> congressman ruben gallego of arizona, thanks for joining us. >> thank you. coming up, new changes in the timeline of the las vegas mass shooting, but the sheriff angrily rejecting allegations that his investigation is incompetent. and does the democratic leader in the house, nancy pelosi, agree with senator bob corker's assertion that president trump may be pushing the u.s. toward world war iii? stay with us for her surprising answer. and the wolf huffed and puffed... like you do sometimes, grandpa? well, when you have copd, it can be hard to breathe. it can be hard to get air out, which can make it hard to get air in. so i talked to my doctor. she said... symbicort could help you breathe better, starting within 5 minutes.
symbicort doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. symbicort helps provide significant improvement of your lung function. symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not
be taken more than twice a day. symbicort contains formoterol. medicines like formoterol increase the risk of death from asthma problems. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. you should tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. symbicort could mean a day with better breathing. watch out, piggies! (child giggles) symbicort. breathe better starting within 5 minutes. get symbicort free for up to one year. visit saveonsymbicort.com today to learn more.
we're following the breaking news. president trump announcing this afternoon that he won't certify iran's compliance with the nuclear deal negotiated during the obama administration. that decision could put the entire agreement in jeopardy, depending on the next steps taken by congress. our national security and political experts are here to discuss. jim sciutto, the implications of this are very, very significant, what the president said today. >> and listen, he took it a step forward from what even secretary tillerson was setting this up for in a conversation with reporters yesterday. he made his message yesterday was that, listen, congress has to take a look at this. if they don't make a change, the fact of the matter is, the deal
stays in place. the president said this more than once today, when he made his statement and on the south lawn as he left, if congress doesn't makes changes he finds sufficient, he said he will terminate the deal. the president could find a way to back off that promise at a later date. that was a more forward-leaning position than we expected. it is more than a punt. this is a punt with potential, you know, real hard consequences. >> and there is a move among many republicans right now in the house and the senate to impose additional sanctions against iran, and the iranians presumably would respond to that. >> yeah, well, absolutely. look, a deal was negotiated. the secretary of defense and other national security officials in the administration and the international monitors have all asserted that they're abiding by the agreement, so changing the terms would be viewed by the iranians as bad faith, as breaking -- essentially breaking the contract. the president doesn't seem to feel there are consequences to
this, but there are, not just in terms of the iranians, but our international partners who also were at the table and made this agreement and want the united states to stay a party to them. there are a lot of ramifications of this. >> yeah, and david makes a good point, kaitlan, about several of the president's top national security advisers saying something very different than what we heard from the president. listen to this. >> iran is not in material breach of the agreement, and i do believe the agreement to date has delayed the development of a nuclear capability by iran. >> my view on the nuclear deal is they are in technical compliance of the nuclear arrangement. >> do you believe it's in our national security interests at the present time to remain in the jcpoa? that's a yes or no question. >> yes, senator, i do. >> that's the secretary of defense james mattis. but the president disagrees with
that. >> yeah, it just shows us how often the president's instincts on national security run in opposition to his actual national security team, except we're seeing it play out in the public here instead of in the other situation room. but what this reminds me of is a comment the president made the other day in the oval office. he was asked if he and rex tillerson, his secretary of state, are on the same page in regards to north korea, and the president said that they have different attitudes. he has a little bit of a different attitude. in the end, his is the one that party matters is that's the way the system works. >> the president said today that iran has had in his words multiple violations of this agreement. that is a statement that doesn't stand up to the facts. don't take our word for it, listen to the secretary of defense and others advising the president on this. affected its nuclear program only, not missile issues, not support for terrorism, et cetera, iran by all accounts, his most senior advisers, every u.s. ally, the british, the french and the germans released
a statement today saying exactly that, they're in compliance. of course russia and china. the iaea that oversees this agreement. the president said iran has had multiple violations. that's just not true. >> the iaea is the international atomic energy agency. >> if you're north korea or anyone else in the world looking at this, you have to ask yourself, if i enter into an agreement with the united states, will the united states keep that agreement? that's not a question that would have been asked six months ago or a year ago. >> you know, you have an important interview coming up on t"the axe files." i want to play an clip with nancy pelosi. you up spoke to her about bob corker's exchange, nasty exchange he had with the president of the united states, especially some of his concern that his policies could lead to world war iii. let's play this clip. >> a lot of heads were turning in washington this week about
the exchange between senator bob corker, who is a republican and chairman of the senate foreign relations committee and the president, in which corker described the white house has an adult daycare center and said that he was concerned that the president might be leading us to world war iii with his intemperance. >> a daycare center where the director was off that day. >> yes, you followed the -- >> i thought it was quite interesting that a senior republican leader in the senate would say that about his -- >> do you share that concern? >> about what? >> about the president's temperament and what the implications are in terms of the world? world war iii, that's a pretty significant -- >> that's a big charge. there would be an initiation of serious military action, which would be most unfortunate. i would say this, i'm not sure the president has understood that a president's words weigh a ton. you can't say things casually and then say, well, i was just putting it way out there.
they'll push me back. those words weigh a ton. not only raises eyebrows, it raises serious concerns among our allies as to how far the president would be willing to go. >> interesting response. did you get into also that dinner that she and senator schumer had with the president, the chinese food, the well-known chinese food dinner? they spoke about the d.r.e.a.m.ers and daca. they all seemed to emerge in a pretty positive nature as a result of that dinner. >> they did. but obviously some things have happened since that have suggest that perhaps the president is backing off a little bit. she left open the possibility in this -- she wouldn't say it outright, but she left open the possibility that this is an issue that could cause a government shutdown at the end of the year if some agreement isn't reached on daca. she said, well, they have the power to decide whether the government will shut down or
not, which is what democrats used to say -- what republicans used to say about democrats when they were planning to shut the government down. >> because at least on this, kaitlan, on this exchange that we just heard from nancy pelosi, she didn't seem as tough towards the president as senator corker. >> we've seen them get along. the president seems to favor people like nancy pelosi and chuck schumer, but when they came out of that meeting, the understanding was, like, money for the border wall would not have to be tied to this daca fix, but when the administration released their hardline immigration principles last week, that was at the top of the list. so the president thinks he's making these deals on capitol hill when he hosts dinners like that, but when it comes down to the actual policy and legislation, what is actually going to come out of it? >> i think he gets the feedback, you know, he floats these balloons out and gets some feedback on whatever blog he's watching or television show he's watching and things can change. >> everybody stick around. an important note to our viewers. you can see the whole david
axelrod latest episode of "the axe files" tomorrow night, 7:00 p.m. eastern right here on cnn. watch it. don't miss it. just ahead, after days of offering some shifting timelines, authorities investigating the massacre in las vegas say they finally, they're nailing down some key details about the gunman's confrontation with a security guard over at the mandalay bay hotel.
it organizes all his accounts, so he can see his bottom line. ahhh...that's a profit. know where you stand instantly. visit quickbooks-dot-com. ...from godaddy! in fact, 68% of people who have built their... ...website using gocentral, did it in under an hour, and you can too. build a better website - in under an hour. with gocentral from godaddy.
- [announcer] imagine what you wear every day actually making your body feel better. that's exactly what tommie copper does for people everywhere. they call it wearable wellness, and tommie copper has infused it into everything they do. why not experience the difference tommie copper can make in your life? visit tommiecopper.com to see the entire line of wearable wellness compression. go right now and find out how you can save 25% on your first purchase plus free shipping. life hurts. feel better. nearly two weeks after the
most lethal shooting massacre in modern american history, authorities in las vegas are still trying to answer some basic questions about when the killing started and why it stopped. our brian todd has been following this story for us. brian, help us make some sense of the latest timeline that is emerging. >> reporter: well, the latest timeline has police finally on the same page with the mandalay bay hotel on when the shooter opened fire on the security guard who encountered him. there's also new information tonight on how the gunman specifically targeted law enforcement officers. the sheriff delivering that news as he appeared before reporters looking completely drained and knocking down what he said were conspiracy theories between the police and the fbi. in an an emotional and at times combative news conference today, the las vegas sheriff once again revised his story on how the las vegas massacre went down, defending his previous timeline as the result of a complex investigation and not incompetence. >> the word "incompetence" has
been brought forward, and i am absolutely offended with that characterization. this is a very dynamic event, a very big event. thousands of people involved. humans involved in documentation. >> reporter: police now say they believe hotel security guard jesus campos happened upon stephen paddock around the same time paddock began shooting on the crowd at the route 91 harvest festival on october 1st, not six minutes before it began as the sheriff had said on monday. >> mr. campos received his wounds in close proximity to 22: 22 22:05. >> reporter: campos had tried to enter the 32nd floor from the stairwell next to the shooter's room. police now say only to find it had been barricaded. >> he had screwed shut the door with a piece of metal and some
screws. >> in the stairwell. >> in the stairwell because he knew we'd be coming out that door to gain entry into his door. so he tried to barricade it as best he could. >> reporter: police say campos was forced to take another route to the 32nd floor and that once in the hallway, the shooter opened fire. also tonight, new information from the sheriff on paddock's tactics. he now says at one point the killer turned his guns away from concert-goers when he saw police arriving. >> it is readily apparent to me that he adjusted his fire and directed it toward the police vehicles. >> reporter: with tears welling in his eyes -- >> excuse me for my emotion. >> reporter: -- sheriff joe lombardo said his officers had rushed to the scene and were trying to save lives. he visited some of those officers this week. >> brady received four separate gunshot wounds and the reason i bring this one up, he asked me
if he could go back to work today. >> reporter: tonight the biggest mystery continues to swirl. >> to me, the biggest mystery is the motive. i mean it's just very odd that we don't know why. when we look at not just mass shootings but anything, we generally know what the motive is fairly quickly. and the mystery to me is that here we are almost two weeks out, and we have no idea why this guy did this. i think that he didn't want us to know the motive. otherwise, we would have found it out by now. >> reporter: but investigators are still doggedly trying to piece that possible motive together. the sheriff saying they're trying to establish a timeline of stephen paddock's life and everyone he was ever associated with. wolf. >> brian, that might even include his late fact, who was a convicted bank robber, right? >> reporter: today "the new york times" posted a psychiatric evaluation that was conducted on the father in a phoenix jail in 1960. the evaluator concluded that benjamin paddock, pictured here,
had a sociopathic personality but said they found no evidence of mental disease or defect and that he understood the difference between right and wrong. stephen paddock's brother has said that the father had very little contact with the family, but they really didn't know him. stephen paddock was only 7 years old when the father went to prison. >> brian todd reporting for us. thanks very much. lots of questions still out there. coming up, today's breaking news. president trump assails two major parts of the obama legacy, deciding not to certify the iran nuclear deal and stopping important subsidies that could undermine obamacare.
backed me up... big time. before movantik, i tried to treat it myself. no go. but i didn't back down. i talked to my doctor. she said: one, movantik was specifically designed for opioid-induced constipation... oic. number two? my movantik savings card can save me big time over the other things i tried. don't take movantik if you have or had a bowel blockage. serious side effects include opioid withdrawal, severe stomach pain, severe diarrhea, and stomach or intestinal tears. tell your doctor about side effects and medicines you take. movantik may interact with them causing side effects. don't back down from oic. talk to your doctor about mo-van-tik. and how you can have a $0 co-pay.
happening now, breaking news. in or out? president trump takes a tough new stance against iran, threatening to unilaterally pull out of the nuclear deal reached during the obama administration. he stopped short. can lawmakers meet the president's demand to strengthen the agreement? scuttling obamacare, president trump acts on a campaign promise and strikes a body blow to the affordable care act, ending critical subsidies that help cover low-income americans. will millions of people now place steep premiere hikes? will congressional republicans move to undo the president's action? aiming at police. las vegas officials now reveal that at one point during the shooting, the gunman turned his fire away from cce