Obama's (Z)Big New False Flag Nuclear Terror Threat Warning Thingy
This episode: what does the hype around "the biggest gathering of world leaders led by an American president since the end of the Second World War" (UK Daily Mail, 12/Apr/10) about "The single biggest threat to U.S. security, both short-term, medium-term and long-term, would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon" (Obama, ibid.) mean for us? Weren't "they" given trillions of tax-dollars since 9/11 (01!) to STOP stuff like this from coming close to happening?
CKLN Rude Awakening is hosted by Black Krishna (BK) on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays from 6 - 7 am on CKLN 88.1 FM, Rogers Cable 947 or CKLN.fm online. Download mp3 links available around 8 am at radio4all.net, archive.org and blackkrishna.blogspot.com. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org with your questions, answers, suggestions, news tips, music and more.
McCain Wants to âPull Triggerâ On Iran
Kurt Nimmo | Infowars.com | April 14, 2010
... Speaking figuratively, the Arizona Republican says the U.S. keeps pointing a loaded gun at Iran but failing to âpull the trigger.â
Nuclear terrorism is gravest threat to global security, Barack Obama warns
UK Daily Mail | 12 April 10
At a two-day summit on Monday, the biggest gathering of world leaders led by an American president since the end of the Second World War, Mr Obama will urge international co-operation on securing every ounce of loose nuclear material within four years.
Ahead of the meeting, he said: âThe single biggest threat to U.S. security, both short-term, medium-term and long-term, would be the possibility of a terrorist organization obtaining a nuclear weapon.
âThis is something that could change the security landscape in this country and around the world for years to come."
"If there was ever a detonation in New York City, or London, or Johannesburg, the ramifications economically, politically and from a security perspective would be devastating.
"We know that organisations like al-Qaeda are in the process of trying to secure nuclear weapons or other weapons of mass destruction, and would have no compunction at using them.â
Alex Jones talks about Obama's stance at the nuclear security summit and his Nuclear Posture Review assertion that terrorists will get hold of nuclear material and use it in an attack. Webster Tarpley appears to analyze the assasination of the Polish Parliament and the Obamattack for about 20 minutes early in the third hour.
Former CIA Officer Robert Steele Reviews Tarpley's 'Synthetic Terror'
Among Hundreds of Books, The Strongest Approach to Truth
October 7, 2006
Reviewer: Robert D. Steele (Oakton, VA United States)
Original at Amazon.com
It is with great sadness that I conclude that this book is the strongest of the 770+ books I have reviewed here at Amazon, almost all non-fiction. I am forced to conclude that 9/11 was at a minimum allowed to happen as a pretext for war (see my review of Jim Bamford's "Pretext for War"), and I am forced to conclude that there is sufficient evidence to indict (not necessarily convict) Dick Cheney, Karl Rove and others of a neo-conservative neo-Nazi coup d'etat and kick-off of the clash of civilizations (see my review of "Crossing the Rubicon" as well as "State of Denial"). Most fascinatingly, the author links Samuel Huntington, author of "Clash of Civilizations" with Leo Strauss, the connecting rod between Nazi fascists and the neo-cons.
This is, without question, the most important modern reference on state-sponsored terrorism, and also the reference that most pointedly suggests that select rogue elements within the US Government, most likely led by Dick Cheney with the assistance of George Tenet, Buzzy Kronguard, and others close to the Wall Street gangs, are the most guilty of state-sponsored terrorism.
The author draws on historical examples of US fabrication of threats (e.g. the bombing of the USS Maine in Havana Harbor) and many others (Jim Bamford publicized Operation Northwoods). It is an undeniable fact that the U.S. Government has been willing to kill its own citizens and fabricate attacks as part of moving the public.