They’re trying to change history—don’t let them. In the chaotic atmosphere of 2020, the Internet Archive is a crucial resource in the fight against misinformation, and we need your help. Right now we’re preserving history as it unfolds, even as it’s unfolding in ways we’ve never seen before. We’re hard at work preserving the record of what’s being said, who’s saying it, and when, creating a verifiable record of rapidly changing situations. We rely on the generosity of individuals in order to do this critical work.
Right now, we have a 2-to-1 Matching Gift Campaign, tripling the impact of every donation. If you find our public record useful, please chip in.
The main concern of this study--what is the image of the artist as it is projected by entertainment films--raises four subsidiary questions. The first is whether that image varies from one film to another and, if so, how and to what extent. Secondly, presuming such variations, are they related to the time period in which the films were produced? Thirdly, are such differences affected by the source for the character of the film? And fourthly, is there an accurate verbal profile which would describe this image, based on similarities among the films viewed? Accordingly, a number of films in which visual artists were either major or subordinate characters were compiled, and nine films which reflected an appropriate time span and type of character were selected for viewing. They were classed in three groups: Biographical, Fictional, and Subordinate Character. The respondents or viewers were graduate students in art education. Findings indicated no substantial variations in the image from one file to another. The time element was found insignificant, and so was the character of the film. It was concluded that a verbal profile can be formulated that describes the artist's image--an image which does not differ much from the expectations of most people in art education. (GO)