tv Hardball With Chris Matthews MSNBC September 9, 2009 7:00pm-8:00pm EDT
call out the republicans who have been out on the campaign trail, spreading information that simply is false, they have lied to the american people. do you think the president should be that strong tonight? >> i think he needs, as i said, to challenge the lies and the disinformation, fear mongering that has so degraded our political system and in doing so he will explain or work to explain to the american people what is in their interest and not allow this party, this republican party, the party of no, it is no longer the party of nor northeastern moderates. no longer the party that negotiated with roosevelt for social security or johnson for medicare. this party wants to cripple barack obama's presidency. he needs to say that in his words with passion, with humanity, and with feeling. >> and with directness. i agree. >> and clarity. >> yes. clarity is a big word tonight. katrina, thanks for your time. earlier in the show i asked
how you're feeling about the president's speech tonight. 78% of you say you're hopeful. 22% say you're somewhat worried about this whole thing. i can't wait to see how it all comes out tonight. back here with a postgame show, 11:00 eastern time, 8:00 pacific. that's "the ed show." i'm ed schultz. live coverage of the president's speech to the joint session starts at 8:00 eastern right here on msnbc. i'll be back for the postgame tonight at 11:00. "hardball" is next right here on the place for politics, msnbc. president's big night. let's play "hardball." eeng, i'm lawrence o'donnell in for chris matthews in baug. in one hour, president obama
will address a joint congress. while it's going too far to say barack obama's presidency rides on tonight's speech, there is general agreement the president has lost control of the debate and tonight is the president's chance to hit the reset button. what should we look for tonight? who is the president's real audience? how will we know if this speech is a success? we'll give you a smart viewer's guide to tonight's speech coming up. we'll hear from the man at the center of the president's inner circle, david axelrod, who will preview what we can expect from the president tonight. getting to 60. what kind of deal does president obama have to make to win over a republican or two and get to that magic filibuster proof 60 votes in the senate? senator claire mccaskill joins us. what will the president say about a public option? liberals are promising to draw a line in the sand and insist no public option, no bill. and finally, keith
olbermann, rachel maddow join us with their perspective at what's in stake for the president tonight. our coverage begins at 8:00 eastern time. after that, it's "countdown" with keith at 9:00. "rachel maddow show" at 10:00 and "the ed show" with ed schultz at 11:00. we begin with the smart viewers guide to what to watch for tonight. nbc news chief white house correspondent chuck todd is nbc's political director and "newsweek's" howard fineman is an msnbc political analyst. let's look at the latest poll that the president is up against on this. a new ap poll finds a majority, 52% this approve of the president's job on health care. it was only 43% in july, which everyone thought was bad enough then. here's a part, just a bit of what the president will say tonight to give you a feel for the tone of this. "but know this, i will not waste time with those who have made the calculation that it's better
politics to kill this plan than improve it. i will not stand by while the special interests use the same old tactics to keep things exactly the way they are. if you misrepresent what's in the plan, we will call you out. i will not accept the status quo as a solution, not this time. not now." chuck todd, we have heard that chorus before. not this time, not now. we heard that in the campaign. is this barack obama trying to use campaign skills to influence the politics of governing? >> reporter: i think a little bit from the speech. you always know what they want the prespin to be by which excerpts they release. it's clear they'd like the president to be seen as the adult in the room. he's the guy who's going to corral the bickering democrats between the ones fighting over public option, not public option, different parts of that. he's going to be the guy who tries to get back to this idea of post-partizanship.
going to be the guy who tries to set aside some of the ugliness he believes took place during july and august when it obviously did damage to his own poll ratings. so, you know, that's one part of the speech. i think it's not going to be -- this is not going to be barack obama trying to do red america/blue america/united states of america. he wants to -- you talk to aides. it's going to be a very direct speech. it is going to be a lot of details this time because they want pea to come away. joe and jane in kansas city being able to easily say what barack obama's plan is. >> okay. guys, let's talk about what the president's going to talk about tonight. first of all, howard, the public option. how strong is the president going to back the public option? i get the feeling he's not going to wave a veto pen over this. how tough is he going to get on support for the public option? >> i think he's going to explain it clearly, defend it. i agree with chuck.
this is not going to be a high-flown rhetorical speech. there's a utilitarian part of this. he has to convincingly explain what he wants. on the public option he's going to make iter resest bl. he's going to describe it more frankly than it's been described in the past. >> chuck, this is an audience, an address to the entire nation. an address to the congress. it's an address very specifically to the state of maine. two senators from the state of maine, especially olympia snowe. >> i should go up there. >> why didn't he do it in maine? you know, there's going to be a camera on olympia snowe throughout this thing to see when she claps, when she doesn't, what she likes, what she doesn't like. >> reporter: the snowe meter. >> the snowe meter. chuck todd's snowe meter. tell us what to look for in olympia snowe's reactions tonight. >> reporter: we talk about the public option. olympia snowe is the first one -- she takes credit for the idea of the trigger. to explain the trigger, that's
this idea where basically they would pass a health care reform bill and they would be open to the threat, basically, government would be telling the private insurance companies we are leaving the option open we will institute a government-run insurance program if you do not meet these specific goals, if you do not meet this number of -- you know, you don't do what these reforms are supposed to make you do then we'll start this public option. she's the one that came up with this idea. she talked about it earlier on our air here on msnbc that this is the way that she sees as a potential to bridge the divide. you have ben nelson, a conservative democratic senator from nebraska who has expressed openness to the trigger if, in his words, it's a real trigger. so, you know, that in and of itself, the fact she is still willing to stand by it tells you, think that's where this thing's going on the public option. the other thing the president wants to do with the public option is put it in context.
he feels like this white house feels like it has become the centerpiece of discussion when in their minds as far as health care reform it's only 10% of the health care reform they're trying to do. >> first, watch what the president says about the public option, see how tough he is. second, watch olympia snowe every minute of the speech. third, what about the word "reconciliation?" presidents don't like to get too technical on legislative processes in speeches like this. my bet is we might that hear that word, reconciliation. where there be code language in there that says to republicans, i am prepared to take this bill through the reconciliation process in the senate and the house which means i will only need 50 votes for final passage and i don't need republicans if you're not willing to play. is he going to make some kind of procedural threat about using reconciliation? >> i don't think you'll get in the weeds of procedure. you read the coded version of saying we're going to go it alone if we have to go it alone. he's already said that in the
excerpt you have there. i think he's going to try to say things that are a i peeling to republicans. this is the -- this speech will be the last clear chance for republicans to get aboard some kind of bipartisan deal. there will be bones thrown to various republicans tonight, i think. the president is going to do that as a predicate to saying, i tried, this is my last effort with these people, they're not going to work with us, except maybe for olympia snowe in the senate, we're going to go it alone. >> i slightly disagree. i slightly disagree in i think there are going to be a lot of mentions of republican ideas. they're going to probably mention john mccain by name at some point in this speech. i think that is all for show. that is about sending the message to the political middle. the independents in this country who have been the ones who have turned thumbs down on the president on health care as a way of saying, i'm not the one polarizing this thing. here are all my republican ideas. it's those guys. >> chuck, where does the president go from here?
i mean, literally where? back out on the road around the country to sell this or up to the hill and go into democratic caucus rooms and try to sell it eye to eye with members of congress? >> reporter: expect to see two things. yes, a road show. that's on saturday. we know that. going to minneapolis. friendly of a territory as you're going to find. minneapolis, minnesota, for things like this. but don't be surprised, it may not happen tomorrow, but it's going to happen soon that you will see the key players on health care basically be brought to the white house. maybe he'll go over there. i'm guessing they will be brought here. the whole point of this speech tonight is to make this the obama plan. the president is taking it over. on point now is basically the message of this speech continto. he's going to bring the key members of congress here to sort of continue to jumpstart the process. >> go ahead. >> i don't think chuck and i were disagreeing there. be that as it may, the fact he's
going to minnesota tells you what's going to happen here. they're going to do a democrats-only plan in the end. that's why you go to minnesota, as chuck said, heartland democratic territory. obama will be saying, look, stick with me, i'll get you 2/3 of what you want, maybe not all of it. >> has the white house been able to cite for you a model of a previous presidency where a president got up there and gave a speech like this that saved legislation in trouble? >> reporter: no, i mean, they haven't. we haven't -- they will say this, that obviously the speech -- the political tool of the big speech has been helpful to barack obama's career. this is thing they're comfortable doing and they -- i think they see it as the last best chance to save health care reform and at least try to get it off the table. there's one other aspect of this. remember, they're not going to use health care now to fix his
politics. at this point they need to get it done. they feel like doing nothing will really hurt him. getting something done will get the voters to give him a pass for getting something done. then we can move on and work on any problems he has with the political middle. >> his aim is to say i did something historical. take the bad poll ratings in exchange to making the claim to history later on. >> reporter: character test. >> thank you, chuck todd. coming up, can president obama unit his own party in congress tonight? we'll ask senator claire mccaskill of missouri. ( conversation ) garth, you're up. hold on, i'm at capitalone.com picking a photo... for my credit card. here's one from my prom. oh, what memories. how 'bout one from our golf outing? ( shouting ) i know, maybe one of my first-born son. dad, mom says the boys gotta go.
introducing anytime gourmet culinary kits for two. it has everything you need. just prep, cook and share your way into a gourmet meal. wild salmon dijon in puff pastry with whole-wheat orzo and vegetables. new stouffer's anytime gourmet. make it amazing. welcome back to "hardball." we're now less than 45 minutes
away from president obama's address to congress and the nation on health care reform. one of the people who will be in the house chamber listening closely to every word is senator claire mccaskill of missouri. senator mccaskill, you had some turbulence in your town hall meetings back in the state during the august recess. what do you need the president to say tonight to get your state behind health care reform, obama style? >> well, we have to fill in the blanks here. we've let misinformation kind of take root and he's got to really clarify that so much of what people have heard is flat wrong. and he also has to lay out the stakes, lawrence. the price of doing nothing really is huge. it is huge for middle class missourians, it is huge for small businesses -- it's huge for our big companies in terms of competitiveness. i think the republican party is
doing a gut check right now. i think they're beginning to realize that blocking health care reform is very risky business politically. >> now, the public option is what everyone's concentrating on. it has gotten the most criticism in the last several weeks. what do you want to hear the president say tonight about the public option? >> well, i think we've gotten in some ways the public option has been the shiny object that has distracted us from a lot of the work that needs to get done in this bill. i hope the president leads with all the things we agree on. that kind of, like, gets them out from under the cover that they're really playing political games. he's got to call out the political games that are being played. there's a huge amount of insurance reform. there's a huge amount of market reform that i think the vast majority of americans and, frankly, the vast majority of congress agrees with. whether we provide a public option or co-op, something we can inject into this exchange of
companies to provide some competition, i don't know if we'll get that done. i think we will. it's not as important as getting this insurance reform done. >> what do you say to the left side of the democratic party, people who believe that there's no reform worth doing without the public option? >> i think they need to keep on open mind. this president is committed to providing quality, affordable health care to all of america, but this is hard. frankly, if it were easy it would have been done a long time ago. we've struggled with this because congress is really good at kicking things down the road when things get controversy. this is hard stuff. everyone needs to not get their feet stuck in cement here. whether it's our party or whether it's their party. we need to listen to the president tonight, come together on a plan that makes sense for most of america and get it done. >> now, the public option is one
of the controversial elements, but there's also behind that all sorts of things that haven't gotten any real public scrutiny yet like the three new top tax brackets voted on in the committees of the house of representatives. the finance committee now saying they want to put a 35% tax on health insurance plans that are worth more than $8,000 a year which is an awful lot of people's health insurance plans. can you vote for elements like that? are you, tonight -- do you know what you can vote for and what you can't vote for in health care reform? >> i don't yet. we haven't seen the details of the finance plan. i'm committed to a bill that's deficit neutral so we've got to figure out a way to pay for it. i think we have to look at the waste and bloat we have right now. we are right now the government is so involved in health insurance in the private sector, we're transferring tax dollars through companies, through
medicare "d" through medicare health advantage. that's a lot of money we can use for what we're doing with health care reform. taxing insurance companies on high-end plans is on the table. i wouldn't agree with something as low as $6,000, $8,000. if we're talking about cadillac plan and the taxes to the insurance company and not to the person who receives the benefit, then i think that is possible. >> but if you tax an insurance company that provides me a benefit, that company is obviously going to immediately have to cut my benefits to pay that tax so my plan will change and the obama argument that if you like your plan you can keep it starts to fall apart when the insurance companies have to change the plans because of a 35% tax. >> not necessarily if they are encouraged to bring down costs in other ways. that's why this public option or co-op becomes more important. they're very profitable now. these companies have really enjoyed great profit over the
last seven, eight years. while health care costs have continued to climb and premiums have continued to climb, their profits have been substantial. so i don't think necessarily that it's a pass through to the people who receive the benefits. >> you worked hard to elect barack obama and worked hard to push up the democratic majority in the senate up to 60. did you think during that campaign year that what you were really doing was designing a united states senate in which olympia snowe would become the most powerful senator in the building? >> you know, lawrence, you've spent some time around here. i actually understood that getting to the arbitrary number of 60 really wasn't going to make a huge difference because many moderate republicans replaced by moderate democrats from states that are not bright blue, from states that, frankly, supported john mccain for president. so we have a lot of moderate members now in our party where there used to be moderates in
the republican party. they're all gone. we beat them all. now there's a handful which is olympia snowe and susan collins. people need to take a deep breath. our party will come together on meaningful health care reform. the president is going to have to fill in is some of the question markets right now. right now in missouri, unfortunately, for some people they are more comfortable with the devil they know than the devil they don't know. they are assuming the worst about what's being proposed. we have to explain to them the best parts of what's proposed. >> i know you have to run over the house chamber and grab your seat before someone else steals it from you. thanks for joining us, claire mccaskill. up next, we'll hear from obama senior adviser david axelrod on what he hopes the president will achieve tonight. natural gas is a cleaner burning fuel, yet a lot of natural gas has impurities like co2 in it. controlled freeze zone is a new technology... being developed by exxonmobil...
to remove the co2 from the natural gas... so we can safely store it... where it won't get into the atmosphere. exxonmobil is spending more than 100 million dollars... to build a plant that will demonstrate this process. i'm very optimistic about it... because this technology could be used... to reduce greenhouse gas emissions significantly. ♪ i've still got room for the internet. with my new netbook from at&t. with its built-in 3g network, it's fast and small, so it goes places other laptops can't. anything before takeoff mr. kurtis? prime rib, medium rare. i'm bill kurtis, and i've got plenty of room for the internet. and the nation's fastest 3g network. (announcer) sign up today and get a netbook for $199.99 after mail-in rebate. with built-in access to the nation's fastest 3g network. only from at&t. [ female announcer ] tired of waiting in line for great hair? [ woman ] hey! [ female announcer ] no worries! [ woman ] yes! [ woman #2 ] all right! [ female announcer ] aussie's quick and easy products
welcome back to "hardball." with us tonight to preview tonight's presidential address to congress, white house senior adviser david axelrod. welcome, david axelrod. as you've learned in the last nine months the politics of governing is about, oh, i don't know, 100 times more difficult than the politics of campaigning? was there anyone in the white house in january who warned the president that it could be this difficult to get health care passed? >> oh, i think there was a vigorous discussion about this, lawrence. at the end of the day the president felt this was a -- such a pressing problem for the country and for families and businesses around the country, for the government, ultimately, because of the cost, that we had to do something and he understood there was political risk involved with it and his attitude is that he's not here to horde his political capital. he's here to solve problems and that's what he's trying to do. >> let's list b to what the president said on "good morning
america." he acknowledged making some mistakes along the way. >> i out of the effort to give congress the ability to do their thing and not step on their toes, probably left too much ambiguity out there which allowed opponents of reform to come in and to fill up the airwaves with a lot of nonsense. >> david axelrod, has your playbook, in effect, been whatever the clintons did, let's do the opposite? they wrote a specific bill, sent it up to the hill. it didn't get where it needed to go. sop you took the opposite tack of, let's make it clear the legislation will be written in the committees? >> well, look, if you look at where we are today, we're farther than anybody has been. four out of the five committees have passed health kreform bill. the committee where you once worked, lawrence, the finance committee in the senate said, today, they're going to pass
something next week. then we'll be able to go to the floor and move this process along. i think we've done the right thing. the president wanted to let the debate go on. he felt this was a serious issue. it warranted that kind of debate. get the ideas on the table and come back in the fall and bring these strands together and get the job done. i think we're in a position to do that. >> now, is the president going to make it clear what he can't live with tonight, because there's a bunch of proposals out there already in the various committees that violate obama campaign promises. he has not said that it's okay to violate those promises and he has not said that it isn't okay to violate those promises. i don't quite get where he is on that. is he going to make that clear tonight? >> it will be very clear what he thinks the major components of this plan are, lawrence. he'll make the case for them and there are some things on which he's become persuaded that he was opposed to as a candidate.
there are others that he still feels very, very strongly about but what has never changed is the goal. the goal is to bring stability and security to the people who have insurance so that they have strong consumer protections, out of pocket costs, prohibition against a ban with people with pre-existing conditions so you can't get thrown off your insurance if you get sick and a marketplace where people can go if they don't have insurance. small businesses and the uninsured where they can get it for a price they can afford. all in the context of trying to bring the overall cost down of health care and i think we're close to achieving that and the president will speak to that tonight. >> david, you know, i worked in the finance committee in '94. what we found was when the republicans gained an advantage, when they managed to knock one piece out of the bill, they didn't stop there and went on to the next thing. they're on the public option now. they seem on the verge of succeeding, of knocking that out of the health care bill.
the next thing standing after that is the employer mandate which republicans oppose and the individual mandate and during the democratic primaries the only difference between barack obama and hillary clinton in terms of governing going forward was the obama candidacy was opposed to mandates in health care and hillary was in favor of mandates in health care. it seems to me all the republicans need to do to knock out the mandates is to use barack obama's eloquent arguments against mandates in the campaign. are you expecting that next? >> i wouldn't make your assumption. the president is going to make the case for a public option within this health insurance exchange tonight. in other words, the pool created for uninsured workers and small businesses so there is a guarantee of competition and choice within these -- within that exchange. there are states in this country where one insurance company has 90% of the business. that's not healthy for consumers.
i wouldn't assume some form of that public option will not be in the final legislation. he'll speak to that tonight on -- in terms of the mandate, he's come to believe that everyone has to have a responsibility within the health care system. we pay $1,000 more per person because of what we have to pay to cover the uninsured who go and get care to cover it. if we make insurance affordable to people, they have the responsibility to take advantage of it. >> chairman baucus released an 18-page outline of what will probably the legislation he introduces next week. one of the components of that involves a 35% tax on health insurance plans that are valued at over $8,000 per year. now, you guys have been very quick to say that if you like your plan you can keep it, but that tax will tax my plan or someone who has a plan over $8,000. it will tax that plan 35% which
means it will immediately cut the benefits of that plan by 35%, so people's plans will not be what they were before this legislation went through with a provision like that. how do you square a provision like that with the idea of if you like your plan you can keep it? >> lawrence, i can probably pick provisions out of every single one of these committee plans that the president would not find to his liking. he'll have his own proposal on this and will speak to it tonight. this is one committee of five and you know the legislative process better than anyone else. there will be a meeting of the minds in the senate, a bill passed out of the house, a meeting of the minds there and we'll bring the two bills together and see where we wind up. i'm not going to comment on individual items on any of these bills in any juncture. i'll let the president speak for
himself. >> you lead the best speech-writing team i think in the history of that building behind you. are you using any models in previous presidencies of where a speech saved legislation? >> well, i don't think we're -- i would dispute the premise of your question. i don't believe that we're in a place where we have to save anything. i think we've made great progress today with the announcement of the senate finance committee. we have more progress and we're on the doorstep of getting this done. what's needed now is to tie this together so we get the final ten yards. there i think a speech would be valuable because i think it will give a clear sense of direction to members of congress and a clear sense to the country about the plan that the president supports, not individual committees, but the president's plan for moving forward. >> by the way -- go ahead. >> i want to say one other thing. we have a great speech-writing team but we're working for the
best speechwriter who's been in that office for many, many moons. he's worked on this, himself. >> i agree. the best speech-writing team and best speech giver. this, you're going to have to agree, this is legislation that is currently in trouble. >> i don't agree with that, lawrence. we'll see. at the end of the day we'll get together and have a beer and find out who was right and who was wrong. >> thanks very much, david axelrod. up next, the moderator of "meet the press," david gregory will be with us as we continue our preview to president obama's speech to congress tonight. just now about 30 minutes away. cheez-it® bakes so much real cheese... in such small bites, people are wondering, how does cheez-it® do it? - i know! - three, two, one. ( beeping, whirring ) ♪ - baking complete! - ( bell dings ) cheez-it®!
mexico city. passenger jet from cancun was briefly hijacked about to land. more than 100 passengers including americans were released before federal police stormed the plane. the crew emerged unharmed the suspect reportedly used a fake bomb to hijack the plane. authorities are describing him as a religious fanatic. back here at home, the federal reserve issued its latest report on the economy today. the feds said the recession is definitely coming to an end but high unemployment along with the struggling auto industry and weakening commercial real estate market will continue to be a drag on the recovery. the markets initially moved lower on that report. the major indices ended the day in positive territory. now back to our special edition of "hardball."
welcome back to "hardball." less than a half hour until the president addresses a joint session of congress. joining me david gregory, "meet the press." clarence page of "the chicago tribune." you've been pulling teeth at the white house these days working the old sources from the old beat. they've told you everything that's in the speech. no surprises at this point? >> there aren't going to be surprises. the primary goal is the president has to connect here. do something he hasn't done on this debate. regain control of it. drive up public support for the reform effort if he's going to then put the screws to those members of congress who are so rebellious. the interesting thing is what he's preparing to do with republicans. the idea of bipartisanship doesn't seem like it's alive and kicking. putting republicans on the spot. what the president wants to do is, you republicans have proposed ideas over the years
and those ideas are in the plan i am presenting tonight. i dare you. are you going to be against it still? he wouldn't use that language. that's some of the point he'll get across tonight. >> when i was chief of staff of the senate finance committee in '94 we tried the same tactic. we presented a bill with an individual mandate in it. as we started to move toward compromise he was no longer in favor of the individual mandate in his own bill. this -- well, it's what happens. it's what happens to this kind of legislation. it tends to go only in one direction because every single piece of it that has a negative side to it. there's a negative story to tell about the individual mandate as well as the very positive one. it's the negative side of the story that the republicans always find their way to and how can obama do something tonight that can turn the public from 52% opposed to obama's approach,
which is where they are now, to what? 52% in favor? i mean, what can we possibly push that number up to? >> well, he needs to educate the public. he had hoped the public would be more educated about what the legislation actually calls before before the august recess. we're late in the game flow. by nbc polls, a lot of the public doesn't know what it is. he has to do the education job he should have done at the last primetime news conference that got overwhelmed by the police profiling issue. >> isn't it striking what you were dealing with back in '94, what was elusive at that point was the idea of something approaching universal coverage and having the insurance companies on board. they appear to have that. yet, what are we statalking abo? we're talking about the public option which is something nobody campaigned on. >> that's the thing. there's this mirage about who's
on board. in legislation you're not really on board until we're voting. so the health insurance companies have, quote, been on board. until today when max baucus comes out and says, we're going to tax health insurance companies with a 35% tax. an unprecedented surtax on individual companies if they offer certain kinds of health plans. that means all health insurance companies are opposed to this bill and of today. no matter what they've said along the way. >> lawrence, you're right. you know, democrats, just this time, i'm not much of an expert on the eternal workings of the senate or the congress as you are. democrats today from what they're telling me they really are concerned about having a replay of hillary clinton and bill clinton's failures o a decade ago in the early '90s and the price they paid in the midterm elections. they have to come up with legislation here. something worth bragging about. >> here's the other thing, to
challenge the notion which i think the white house is challenging your take on the idea that legislation goes in one direction, right? they don't want to accept that reality. what they'll say is what's different now is that democrats in leadership understand the consequences of inaction, so they're going to everything they can to produce something. now, are the insurance companies, will they change their tune? they're still at the negotiating table where the president wants them. at least they're not away at this point. they have some time to maneuver. that's their argument that democrats understand the consequen consequences of inaction, therefore, they have to get something. what are the parameters of that something? >> consequences of inaction, there are two interpretations of that. back in '94 as we went into the election, what the democrats in the congress believed by the time we got to the election was the mistake we made was scaring the public for as long as we did that we were going to pass
something. if we failed a lot earlier and they were calm about these democrats not scaring them anymore, we wouldn't have lost so much. so this theory the white house and others on the hill are advancing that we will be penalized for passing something, what if you pass something that is opposed by 52% of the american public? >> we're misreading the polls if we think america turned against health care reform. they've been hearing what the republican version of it is. death panel, all those buzz words. the democrats have not put their own name on this proposal. the republicans have named it obama care. they have had too much of their argument defined by opponents to what they want to do . if you describe it to the public that shows the positive things they're trying to do, that will gain back support. >> this is a leadership test. independent voters, voters across the political spectrum, they want reformers, they want
reform to look like reform. what is reform? reform is not just the government swoops in and pays for everything. it's something that gets paid for over time. it's something you notice makes a difference in your life. the problem is this wouldn't take effect until 2013. maybe there are some things the president could talk about tonight that would advance people to get care like catastrophic coverage. that's the leadership test. he's got to sound and act like a reformer to make people confident in his leadership abilities again. it can't just be, hey, i got all the money in the world, i'm going to throw at it here. he has to make a difference. >> clarence, what does he have to do after tonight? what we know happens is next week, max baucus with the finance committee comes out and says, here's my bill. a week after that he's going to have a markup, as they say in the finance committee where they're votes on the bill. that will take several days. there will be debate, amendments, a real story to follow there. the president will no longer be in control of that story when
the finance committee is acting and on a daily basis that committee is going to come up with new proposals that were not mentioned in the obama speech. so i as a voter is sitting out there saying, i was with obama when i heard his speech but they're talking about stuff i'm confused about. does he have to come back and give another speech? >> he has to get a handle on that. his strategy up until now is to avoid the clinton mistakes and let congress work out the details of this. that has not worked out so well so far. >> he has to work it, too. working the votes. getting ahold of what actually gets passed. you know, he's in a position to do that if he can get something out of committee -- or before committee, get it out and start working individual members. >> we're going to have to leave it there. thank you david gregory and clarence page. up next, msnbc's keith olbermann and rachel maddow will be with us to take us into the president's address to the joint session of congress coming up at
the top of the hour. this is humiliating. stand still so we can get an accurate reading. okay...um...eighteen pounds and a smidge. a smidge? y'know, there's really no need to weigh packages under 70 pounds. with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service, if it fits, it ships anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. cool. you know this scale is off by a good 7, 8 pounds. maybe five. priority mail flat rate boxes only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship.
(announcer) what are you going to miss when you have an allergy attack? achoo! (announcer) benadryl is more effective than claritin at relieving your worst mptoms. and works when you need it most. benadryl. you can't pause life. what are these? healthy choice knows if they can get people to try just one little bite they'll love it. so they're doing an online coupon promotion. so what is the little box for? i tell them "they want you to be their spokesperson, "think bigger. take millions of these little bite boxes "full of food, put them up in a hot air balloon,
tonight in this speech? >> i don't know, lawrence. i'm honestly i've been thinking about this more and more in the context of having been exposed to the latest version of our health care system over the last couple weeks in my own family again for the second time this year. i was thinking about this in the context of american history and the decision in the 1880s it was that reaffirmed the right for corporations to be treated as human beings without the responsibility of human beings. since then american history could be written about this battle between citizens and corporations. there have been many far more important moments in that struggle between those two often mutually exclusive nearly such categories of entities in this country. in our era i can't think of one more important than the current one. this will be the night we find out if barack obama works for the people or the corporations. simple as that. >> rachel maddow, how will you judge the success of this speech? >> i think that keith is really
onto something in terms of the overall ideological import of tonight's speech. one of the things that we have seen over the late portion of the summer as things got really sort of cooky on the right is that we saw an emergence of a vocal progressive minority within the republican party. getting louder and getting more and more articulate and getting more traction in terms of the number of people willing to hear from them. willing to hear very strong progressive point of view from them that frankly the private insurance companies need to justify what it is that they do for us. that we couldn't do better with a public plan. the idea of a single payer is not necessarily a beltway idea right now but it is becoming a progressive idea. i think we'll see right now where the president thinks the center is. i think we've seen a big push from the left to put the center
more back in where i think the center actually is instead of this sort of constant rightward drift that we've seen over a generation in washington especially on these domestic issues like health care. >> keith, as you know, there's nothing like a personal interaction with the american health care system to start thinking quickly about what's wrong with it. the president is going to use a lot of antidotal examples tonight and cite people who are in this audience tonight who have had some very serious problems dealing with this system. what else does he need to do? what does he need to say to those who began this two years ago thinking that they would like to go forward for a medicare for all type plan but have been willing to compromise themselves in the direction of the plans that have been passed in the house of representatives that include a public option. i would judge that those people have already compromised themselves halfway. what does he need to say to them to keep them on board to whatever extent he wants to
compromise some more? >> he needs to say i won't sign a bill that doesn't have the public option in it. as simple as that. that would be the idealized version of it because the president is an expert on many things and it seems to me to be one of the few people you run into life where you realize that they can do their jobs a lot better than you can do your own job. however, as you discussed if he's going to fill this up with antidotes about people's experience with the health care system, everybody in this audience has one that's better or in this case worse than the one he's going tell. we're all experts about this. if we're not experts and you're watching at home and not an expert on the health care system, sooner rather than later you will become one and you will be horror struck by how much worse it was than it was last spring and how much worse it was than last year and how much worse it was than when you were a kid. it's getting worse and worse and it's welcoming more and more of a blood sucking -- and i use that imagery deliberately, of
wallets. it's a hospital in which things are removed from you and the first one is cash. that's what our american health care system is right now and that's the issue that he has to address. he has a choice. he is as rachel suggests a definition of some degree of his presidency. who does he work for? the corporations or the people? >> we'll see you at the top of the hour anchoring our coverage. rachel is staying with us as we await president obama's speech to congress coming up in just a few minutes. you're watching "hardball" only on msnbc. and i'm also a pharm. getting an early flu shot is the best thing you can do... to protect you and your loved ones from the flu. it's also one of the easiest things you can do... because walgreens is now offering seasonal flu shots... every day of the week with convenient hours guaranteed. so you can just stop in. our 16,000 dedicated pharmacists... and take care clinic nurse practitioners... are waiting to help you beat the flu... in neighborhoods nationwide. at walgreens we want you to know, there's a way to stay well.
if you're using other moisturizing body washes, you might as well be. you see, their moisturizer sits on top of skin, almost as if you're wearing it. only new dove deep moisture has nutriummoisture, a breakthrough formula with natural moisturizers... that can nourish deep down. it's the most effective natural nourishment ever. new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. superior natural nourishment for your skin. new dove deep moisture with nutriummoisture. it's an idea that makes america strong. it's a fair day's pay for a hard day's work. it's health insurance when you're sick or injured. it's job security to provide for your family. it's the fabric of a sound economy. it built the middle class. and it's what the employee
free choice act is all about... letting workers choose to join a union to earn better pay and benefits. the employee free choice act. it's time the economy worked for everyone again. the economy worked for everyone again. (groans) a lot of people are gonna be kicking themselves for not buying in this market. (woman) visit remax.com where you can see all the listings in thousands of cities and towns.
we're back with rachel maddow as we await president obama's speech to congress at the top of the hour. rachel, as i told you last week on your show when bill clinton waved his veto pen to this audience and threatened to veto anything that was not universal coverage as he defined it, republicans didn't believe that he would do that.
barack obama's speech, the exerts leaked so far, do not appear to be as strong as president clinton's was. do republicans walk out thinking they'll need to do business or democrats think he'll be with us all the way on what we want to do here? >> i think republicans in congress are really the only constituency in the entire country that the president is not talking to tonight. he'll be talking to democratic members of congress, i think, telling them that they are going -- they should work with him to be part of something they can be proud of and something they can campaign on and something they don't have to be sorry about. i think that he's going to be talking to republican constituents and republican voters at home trying to perhaps drive a wedge between them and the members of congress who represent those states and districts trying to say, listen, i know