tv Face the Nation CBS March 18, 2012 10:30am-11:00am EDT
>> today on face the nation, game on. after waiting for months for republicans to pick president obama's opponent, the white house decided to start the general election campaign anyway and did it with a double barreled attack. >> if some of these folks were around when columbus set sail, they must have been founding members of the flat earth society. they would not have believed that the world was round. >> president obama was right and they were dead wrong. >> reporter: republicans fired back. at each other. mitt romney, the republican with the most delegates, finished behind rick santorum annuity gingrich in mississippi and alabama. >> if you're the frontrunner and you keep coming in third, you're not much of a frontrunner. >> reporter: but by romney's new math there is no way santorum or gingrich can get
enough delegates to secure the nomination. he wants them to quit. but one analyst said not so fast. >> the closer mitt gets to that magical number of 1144 delegates the more leverage he has at a hypothetical brokered convention. however, however, you know, if rumors of a santorum-gingrich super ticket prove true, well, we're in for a hot time in tampa. >> reporter: hey, it's already hot. >> got to be hot. >> reporter: we'll try to keep the heat on as we get the latest from the president's top strategist david axelrod, republican national chairman reince preibus, former republican party chair and romney supporter ed gillespie, fox news contributor rich lowrie and our own norah o'donnell. after all, this is "face the nation." captioning sponsored by cbs
from cbs news in washington, "face the nation" with bob schieffer. >> schieffer: good morning again. welcome to face the nation. david axelrod is the president's chief campaign strategist. he joins us from chicago. welcome, mr. axelrod. let me start with this. as the price of gas has gone up, the president's approval ratings have gone down. but when the republicans started pummeling the president about this, he sort of poked fun at them. here's what he said last week. >> they tell the same story. they head down to the gas station. they make sure a few cameras are following them. and then they start acting like we have a magic wand and we will give you cheap gas forever. if you just elect us. every time. been the same script for 30
years. like a bad rerun. >> schieffer: but here's the irony, mr. axelrod. it is like a rerun because this is what candidate obama said about george bush four years ago. >> all the while, while here in ohio, you're saying nearly $3.70 a gallon for gas, two-and-a-half times what it cost when george bush took office. >> schieffer: what about that? what is the strategy? is the price coming down? do you have a plan to do that? i mean, in the short run? >> well, first of all i'm interested to hear that clip because in june of 2008 the price of gas was $4.10 a gallon. what it underscores is the fact we're in a global oil market. when we're dependent solely on oil, we're affected by the rate shocks again and again and again. what he said then, what the president said then and what he's enacted during this
administration is that we need a... an "all of the above" policy so we can break this dependence on oil so yes we need to produce more oil domestically. we're up 12% since he's been president. we're producing more than at any time in eight or nine years. but we also-- and we're producing more gas than ever before. but we also have to explore other things. renewable energy. we've doubled the use of renewable energy. wind and solar. biofuels. we have to save more. he's increased fuel efficiency standards for the first time in three decades in conjunction with the auto industry. that's saving a million barrels of oil a day when they're fully implemented. 2.2 million barrels of oil a day. the notion that we can simply drill our way out of this or that somehow that if we say that, that the gas prices will go down magically now. newt gingrich's $2.50 a gallon. that's not oil talk but snake oil talk. the american people know the
difference. >> schieffer: mitt romney said as late as yesterday that the president actually wanted gas prices to go up when he was running for president. he also said that the president should fire his three top energy people because they were trying to get the price up. what's that about? >> well, i think it's about nonsense is what it's about. obviously you heard the president four years ago. he wasn't advocating higher gas prices. again we have to have a national strategy for getting control of our energy future. that involves persistence, not just in increasing domestic oil and gas production. we've freed up tens of millions of new acres for exploration and for oil production in the future. but we have to explore these other avenues. if we don't do all of those things we're going to be right back here again every election season and politicians like mr. romney will pander and the poor american consumer will be
left in the same position. so we need to keep going forward with an "all of the above" strategy on energy. >> schieffer: was it a mistake now in retrospect to stop that keystone pipeline project? they were going to bring a pipeline to bring the oil down to the gulf coast from canada. that put a lot of people to work amongst other things. do you have regrets about not moving along with that? >> first of all, bob, you should direct that question to mr. priebus and to the republican leadership in the congress because what they did was force a premature decision on this. the state department said they needed more time to evaluate the proceed jokt and all of its implications including what it would mean for the water aquefers in nebraska. and the congress wanted to force a decision for political reasons. they did. not having the time to make a proper decision, they had to decline this proposal. if it's resubmitted it will be
considered again. hopefully in the the time frame that is appropriate. but understand this president has approved dozens of pipelines. he's going to speak this week about another spur from oklahoma to the gulf so we can relieve a glut of oil that we have and get it down to refinerees there. so he certainly is not hostile to transporting oil, but we have to do it in the appropriate way and protect the public safety in doing it. no, it may have been a mistake for the republicans to force the decision so quickly. that i agree with. but that's their decision to explain. not ours. >> schieffer: you know, it seems like that you all were waiting for the republicans to pick a nominee before you actual he'll started to kick off the general election campaign. but i got the sense last week you were tired of waiting. and you decided to just go ahead when the president and the vice president went out there and made some pretty strong attacks. do you have any idea who you
think you're going to be running against yet? >> no, i don't. you should address that to your next guest. we thought we'd have a nominee by now. every time it looks like mr. romney has some momentum he gets set back. he hasn't been able to make the sale to his own party. you know, here in illinois, we have a primary on tuesday. he's outspending rick san torp up 7-to-1. yet the polls are pretty narrowly in his favor right now. i think the republican party is having a hard time picking a nominee. i will say this, bob. i do watch him parading around the state calling himself an economic heavyweight. it's the same pitch he made in 2002 to the people in massachusetts. what happened? massachusetts went from 10th in the nation in job creation to 47th. their debt went up 16.5%. government jobs grew at six times the rate of private sector jobs. if he thinks he's an economic heavyweight he must be looking
in a fun house mirror because that is not the record of an economic heavyweight. >> schieffer: all right. mr. axelrod, we thank you for that. mr. priebus is right here. and today is his birthday. we want to wish you a happy birthday. >> thank you, bob. i think david's living in a permanent fun house mirror myself. anyway, go ahead, bob. >> schieffer: why? >> well, i mean he's defending a president, i mean initially you talked about gas prices. he's defending a president that where gas prices were $1.85 a gallon when he took over. he defends the president's position. when the president's own energy czar said-- and this is undisputed-- that he wanted gas prices to go to european levels. so we could all be forced.... >> schieffer: when was this? >> years ago. so we could be forced to drive, you know, battery-operated cars and scooters around. he's back pedaled on that statement. but very quickly, the obama
been in favor of this keystone pipeline, 20,000 jobs. if there was ever such a thing as shovel ready projects here was one of them plus it would get us a step closer to energy independence. it wouldn't be the whole deal. but it's a step closer. this president has shut down everything when it comes to energy independence in this country. we're sitting on a wealth of energy to get us to a place where we don't have $4 and $5 gas. this president isn't there. he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. >> schieffer: "new york times" reports this morning that behind the scenes strategist is starting to look into the possibility of what if this thing, your race for the nomination, goes all the way to the convention. what are you doing? >> (laughing) you mean in preparation for that. >> schieffer: yes. >> first of all, i don't see that happening. one of these four candidates will be our nominee. i think we're halfway through the nomination process, bob. we're only at half time. i think that this process is going to play itself out.
we will have a nominee. i think fairly soon. one, two months away. then we're going to be prepared for tampa. look, i mean, everyone watching this program knows-- and you and i would probably agree-- a month is like a year. and a week is like a month and a day is like a week. when we get to june, july, august, september, we're going to have an eternity to debate who is going to be the next president. >> schieffer: are you saying though that you're not making plans in any way shape or form for this to go all the way to the convention? >> we're not making plans for a brokered convention. the up side is we have rules to handle any possibility. obviously we're going to follow those rules. but right now what we're talking about is how who is going to be our nominee and what did the president promise to the american people and what he delivered. do you remember four years ago howard dean and chris dodd, two former chairmen of the dnc, were saying in headline after headline, look-- and i've got them all here in front of me-- that the democratic process is killing our chances.
our nominee won't be worth anything because hillary clinton and barack obama are fighting each other tooth and nail. guess what, a tough primary, a little bit of drama actually helped barack obama. now we're suffering the consequences of that. >> schieffer: and others have said that. but john mccain is the only republican i've heard to say on camera what some other republicans have said to me off camera. that is, the longer this thing goes on, the harder it's going to be for us to win. >> i love john mccain, but john mccain's old former advisors during the '08 race were also saying that the democratic race is helping john mccain. look what happened four years ago. we put america to sleep with our... with our primary four years ago. barack obama and hillary clinton nearly gouged each other's eyes out. what happened? he won. look at all those governors from wisconsin to ohio to
wisconsin to pennsylvania. primaries make candidates stronger. it forces the media to talk about our candidates. it keeps the focus on barack obama which is what at the end of the day this election is going to be about. it will be a referendum on whether people are better off today than they were three or four years ago which they're not. and it will be a referendum on whether barack obama is a man of his word and fulfills the promises that he makes to the american people, which he has not. >> schieffer: do you really mean that john mccain put the voters to sleep? >> no, i think our process did. i think our process did. we had no drama at all. we were lock step in the middle march. we had our nominee. all of the excitement, all of the energy was on hillary clinton and barack obama. remember, hillary clinton, if we forget which we always forget history very quickly. one pennsylvania... she won pennsylvania on april 22. hill hillary clinton. here we are in the middle of march. i just reject this idea of.... >> schieffer: one question. do you think it would be
better if newt gingrich dropped out? >> i'm not going to be the referee for these guys. they'll have to decide for themselves. what's most important is that we elect a president that can not just give a speech but can make a promise and keep a promise and right now the american people know we're on the wrong track and we need a different president. >> schieffer: thank you so much, mr. chairman. >> you bet. >> schieffer: we'll be right back with our political round table in a minute. last season was the gulf's best tourism season in years.
in florida we had more suntans... in alabama we had more beautiful blooms... in mississippi we had more good times... in louisiana we had more fun on the water. last season we broke all kinds of records on the gulf. this year we are out to do even better... and now is a great time to start. our beatches are even more relaxing... the fishing's great. so pick your favorite spot on the gulf... and come on down. brought to you by bp and all of us who call the gulf home. >> schieffer: with welcome back now. ed gillespie is now a top strategist. rich lowrie is a busy man. he gets paychecks from fox news as a contributor, from "time" magazine as a columnist and he finds time to be editor of the national review. >> when are you going to start paying me, bob. >> schieffer: (laughing) we're also joined by our own norah o'donnell who does this on a voluntary basis. (laughing) she's such a good citizen.
ed, let me ask you this question. "new york times," big story on the front page today says reince preibus says not so but i have a feeling there are people that are behind the scenes planning for this thing going all the way to the convention. do you think that's going to happen? >> i don't think it's going to happen. i do think that our process is different this year than it has been in the past. we have this proportional delegate allocation. you have the super pacs, you know, playing a role that we haven't ever seen in primaries before. it is stretching it out. but my sense is, bob, that at the end of the day someone is going to wrap up the nomination. i think the likely nominee is mitt romney. i support governor romney. i voted for him in the virginia primary. i think when you look at the numbers, he's likely to prevail. >> schieffer: do you have any regrets now looking back? michael steele the previous rnc chairman who was the one who changed this to proportional which means if you win a primary you don't get all the delegates. you get a number and percentage to the amount of votes that you got. do you think it would be better to go back to the old
way? >> you know, the grass is always greener. the fact is for a long time republicans said we have a process that allows a frontrunner to wrap up too soon. we're done by march. we need a longer process that allows for people to rise and challenge the frontrunner. that's what we have now. i do think that whoever emerges at the end of the day again i think it will be governor romney will be stronger as a result of that process. but there's no doubt there are a lot of folks saying, boy, i wish we had a nominee who could take the case to president obama. there is some second-guessing. but i actually think that this process is going to be good for us. >> schieffer: rich, let me ask you the question that i asked reince preibus just now. would it be best if newt gingrich just got out? you have actually written about that. >> i have a column in time this week about this. i think he doesn't have a rationale anymore. he's not even a reasonal candidate. he's a regional candidate. his geographic base seems to be the border between south carolina and georgia, the two states he's won. now there's some debate about who he would actually help if he got out.
some polls say his vote would split both ways been santorum and romney. santorum people don't believe that. if you look at the results in alabama and mississippi, santorum's win came directly out of the hive of newt gingrich. i think santorum has outclassed and beaten newt gingrich and deserves a chance at the clean shot at romney. >> there's one issue though. that is that the republicans are making the case that this is like 2008 with hillary clinton-barack obama. you heard reince preibus say we put people to sleep. this has not excited the republican base. turnout is down in the republican primaries. and a well respected republican pollster has said this process has had a corrosive affect on the nominees. mitt romney has very high unfavorables, higher than any other recent nominee other than bill clinton so it has taken its toll on the republicans. on the flip side, president obama is looking at a very difficult re-election with unemployment still at 8% and a lot of people feeling pain because of rising gas prices
but the republicans are struggling. i think it's not fair to say that they've excited people. >> schieffer: what about that, rich? >> well, i don't know whether it's the process or it's mitt romney. i think he's a weak frontrunner. i think he is inherent leap kind of the default candidate in this process. he has to take down the other guys in order for himself to pop up. i think that's one of the reasons he had trouble down in alabama and mississippi. part of which was just demographic and geo graphic but he really needs to keep his boot on the neck of whoever is in second place. he did it with perry. he did it with newt. he needs to keep doing it with santorum. it's not a particularly uplifting way to win the nomination but i think it's inevitably. >> schieffer: what's worked is negative advertising for him. in contest after contest. but what about that, red... ed? you're a romney man here. why is he having such a hard time connecting with the republican party. >> the fact is that the super pacs are new to the primary process. they're new to the general election process.
they are inherently more negative. they run more negative ads. they run almost solely negative ads. that does have a depressing effect in terms of turnout in republican primary parties. i don't think the damage is permanent. once there's a nominee, the dynamic changes overnight. it becomes a one on one race with president obama. this is a referendum. >> schieffer: nor aa one quick comment. >> i think that's absolutely true. once mitt romney presumably becomes the nominee, the fight will be joined. there will be a very clear contrast between the two candidates. we'll see every day something on the economy. energy, all the major issues put before the american voters. >> schieffer: i will say i've never seen anything like this one and i've been around here for a long time. back in a moment with some final thoughts. we always hear about jobs leaving america.
here's a chance to create jobs in america. oil sands projects, like kearl, and the keystone pipeline will provide secure and reliable energy to the united states. over the coming years, projects like these could create more than half a million jobs in the us alone. from the canadian border, through the mid west, to the gulf coast. benefiting hundreds of thousands of families throughout the country. this is just what our economy needs right now. or creates another laptop bag
or hires another employee, it's not just good for business, it's good for the entire community. at bank of america, we know the impact that local businesses have on communities. that's why we extended $6.4 billion in new credit to small businesses across the country last year. because the more we help them, the more we help make opportunity possible. omnipotent of opportunity. you know how to mix business... with business. and you...rent from national. because only national lets you choose any car in the aisle. and go. you can even take a full-size or above. and still pay the mid-size price. i could get used to this. [ male announcer ] yes, you could business pro. yes, you could. go national. go like a pro. >> schieffer: if there is one
constant in american politics, it's this: the price of gasoline is one of the most potent of all political issues. when we fill 'er up the price stairs us in the face right there on the gas gauge. gas prices hinge on many factors some of which presidents can influence; some of which they can't. china's gigantic need for more and more oil, turmoil in the middle east, even the weather to name three that the president can't control. nevertheless, every candidate running for president blames the previous president if gas prices have gone up. candidate obama blamed george bush just as republicans are now blaming president obama. which is why i found a story in yesterday's "new york times" so interesting. russia is a different place. but the story reminded us just how different. to get elected russia's newly installed president putin made a lot of expensive campaign promises, big raises and fatter pensions for doctors, lawyers and the military. even bonuses for having more
children. we know about campaign promises. but here's what's different. russia gets half its revenue from taxes on oil and gas. what putin didn't tell the people is that the to pay for all his promises he has to drive the price of oil up to $150 a barrel. that's $30 more than the current price, which made me wonder. if energy prices go down in russia, will the next russian candidate blame president putin? now there is a bumper sticker for you. back in a minute. ud. a small lab in berlin is using supercomputing to fight cancer. an industrial city in china is becoming a high-tech hub in under four years. britain's building a smart grid to help cut emissions by 80%. even an independent studio in malaysia can produce big-time blockbusters. transforming business through the cloud. that's what i'm working on. i'm an ibmer. let's build a smarter planet.
but when she got asthma, all i could do was worry ! specialists, lots of doctors, lots of advice... and my hands were full. i couldn't sort through it all. with unitedhealthcare, it's different. we have access to great specialists, and our pediatrician gets all the information. everyone works as a team. and i only need to talk to one person about her care. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.
how they'll live tomorrow. for more than 116 years, ameriprise financial has worked for their clients' futures. helping millions of americans retire on their terms. when they want. where they want. doing what they want. ameriprise. the strength of a leader in retirement planning. the heart of 10,000 advisors working with you one-to-one. together for your future. ♪ >> schieffer: thank you for watching. i'll be away next week but norah o'donnell will be here for the whole show. i hope you'll join her. just wanted to check and make sure that we were on schedule.
[ male announcer ] for our families... our neighbors... and our communities... america's beverage companies have created a wide range of new choices. developing smaller portion sizes and more low- & no-calorie beverages... adding clear calorie labels so you know exactly what you're choosing... and in schools, replacing full-calorie soft drinks with lower-calorie options. with more choices and fewer calories, america's beverage companies are delivering.