the clinton administration was verythe clinton administration s very aware of its democratic pointed to, and they congress work they were not able to provide more aid pointed to congress, why congress could not respond with sanctions if russia continued to iran. at the same time, i think americans did not understand ir- they understood, but the way fought boris yeltsin choco political constraints, was by saying -- he is the only democrat in town, so we have to sub him, no matter what. then there is the supreme soviet. well, the supreme soviet is all coming browns and reds. then you have the election of december, 1993. is thee parliament methodically elected, that it is again come in his brown and reds. -- it is again come in just andght -- communist brown reds. if they oppose yeltsin's programs, they are a monster and are about to take the country back to stalinism. that is certainly not a democratic way to treat your parliament. a really not democratic way to two times that yeltsin used massive force, first against the parliament -- no matter who was in parliament. that was the firs

years later the clinton administration came in, all i can say is bill clinton picked up exactly where bush 41 was. it was an extraordinary transition. inauguration, a number of people including those you have heard from, and are going to hear from during the rest of the conference were calling their counterparts who were coming in under the new administration. anothers, of course, ironic dimension of the bush 41 to clinton administrations. that was, bill clinton knew it masterly wayf the in which president bush had warled the end of teh cold and the sensitivity he brought end in made the cold war a reasonably peaceful way. clinton,r president before he was president clinton, when he was a president-elect saying i will not do the southern accent -- bush is really something. he has acted like a very skillful, very prudent, very for mikaeld control gorbachev as he tried to bring this rickety thing down for a soft landing on the ash heap of history. had the coldthat, war continued, let's put it this in august of 1991, if they had succeeded bill clinton would not have had much of a chance

when four years later, the clinton administration came in, all i can say is that bill clinton picked up exactly where bush 41 was. it was an extraordinary transition well before inauguration. a number of people, including a couple of people you heard from will hear from during the rest of the conference were calling their counter parts who were coming in in the new administration. there is, of course, another even more ironic dimension of the bush 41 to clinton administration. that is that bill clinton knew that it was because of the masterly way in which president bush had handled the end of the cold war. and the sensitivity that he brought to that made the cold war end in a reasonably peaceful way. i remember president clinton, before he was president clinton, when he was president-elect, saying, i won't dot southern accent, but he said bush is really something. he's acted like a very skillful, very prudent, very calm ground control for gorbachev as he tried to bring this rickety thing, the ussr, down for a soft landing on the ashy of history. and he also notes, or knew, that had t

certainly the clinton administration had empathy for russia and the clinton administration had really the best experts there who were willing and wanted to help russia. so how does that not work out? i think to learn any lessons for the next opening, we've got to understand how is that most well-meaning and prepared administration does not fulfill the goals with the russians, and how does that make russians really agree about the 1990s? thank you. [ applause ] >> so what i'd like to do since we're very short on time is i'd like to go ahead and take a question from sergei and from jeremy, and take both those questions, turn to the panel and then we'll breathe a sigh of relief and continue the discussions in more relaxed setting. sergei? >> thank you for a great panel. 1990s are extremely important. on the unhand, it's a soft landing of a huge superpower without major violence. on the other hand, issues we have today in u.s.-russian relations, their roots are also in the 1990s, and the question that i have is with regard to the fate of the commonwealth of independent states. putin in hi

thanks to the clinton and obama and the bushns, administration. host: what is the question? this and menstruation will have to do with it because they do not want them to target u.s. cities. guest: thank you. i appreciate that. my view on the united states being a global leader and playing an important role in the world and being the one to help set the agenda and drive out positive outcomes for our people, it came from growing up in a middle-class how -- household. i grew up in the cold work turn ronald reagan and i agreed with him when he said america could be a shining city on a hill. i believe that still. i do not think there is anything elitist about a proposition that the united states can have a principled and effective foreign policy in the world in which we are rallying our friends and allies to solve the great problems of our time. nothing inconsistent with that and wanted to stand up first and foremost for the interests of the american people p or north korea specifically, i think you are partially right actually, that the clinton administration and the bush admin

administration did figure out

and on friday, former clinton administration labor secretary robert rice will be at the first parish church in cambridge, massachusetts, to talk about the economic and social cycles societies experience and their effect on the common good. that's a look at some of the events booktv will be covering this week. many of these events are open to the public. look for them to air in the near future on booktv on c-span2. >> visions and values were compelling to me, offering a clear pathway away from my past, a chance to contribute to the greater world out there and still retain my family's love. if mario cuomo could do it faced with a different set of challenges -- like not speaking english until he was 8 years old -- then so could i. how, then, could i tell mario cuomo that a story would appear in the press the next day linking my brother, our name to john gotti? how do i talk about organized crime in my family with the one italian-american elected official who personified the complete opposite? i picture myself on the 57th floor in the press conference room at the world trade center tower

but to your question, i have been at the state department in the first two years since the clinton administration, 93, 94 and will televised briefings there and i got to the white house and i said we don't televised briefings. that is bs. why don't we just change the rules and no problem. it was fine up until monica lewinsky. [laughter] but i think what the folks here will remember is i wished i'd put in place a rule be had at the state department, which is we don't live broadcast these things because they are raw material for journalists who are trying to gather information about the white house. they are not news events. he now has to go out. [inaudible] it is treated now as an entertainment product on cable television and that's not how the white house briefing is supposed to be. the white house put out what it wants to sing. u.s. reporters, many of you here go check out against other sources and then you report and give us come in the american people, a more valid report. when it becomes a wide tv production every day, it becomes something else than what a briefing is supposed to be. i very m

since the late 1980's, the clinton during administration, during the george w. bush administration, increasingly as a result of ,onservative neoconservative new democratic rhetoric. government was seen to be the problem. extrapolated the wrong markets thinking that had tramped. we should therefore china. we should therefore championed the markets. that essay was written specifically to rebut those arguments. awareely to make people that a strong argument can be made that what won the cold war was the synergy between government initiative enterprise and private markets. one has to understand that synergy which was often recalibrated. it was always there. of theppened as a result end of the cold war and the rhetoric that accompanied the end of the cold war in the 1990's and to this day has been our understanding of the role of government. what is important is for those of us who believe my interpretation is complete, understanding the role of government is key to understanding domestic success that also foreign-policy success , understanding the role of government

>> the spring of 1994 saw a clinton administration still reeling from early stumbles, constantly trying to climb out from under mountains of bad press. >> we were looking at things we didn't think, you know, could be survived, and there was a lot of it. nowadays, we're in the midst of the same sort of phenomenon with this unbelievably controversial president, who does and says things that we've never seen a president do or say before. and it may be more intense now than it was then, but it was very intense back then. >> on the morning of may 6, 1994, just two days before the three-year statute of limitations for civil-rights claims was set to expire, wyers for paula jones filed district court.rocs federal >> and it was a mob scene of press. they didn't know about us at the time, so we walked past them. i had the stack of complaints with me. >> counsel. >> and i passed them along to the clerk. >> sorry, guys. >> is this the jones case? >> and all hell breaks loose. "it's the complaint! they're filing it!" craziness up at the clerk's office. we get in the elevator, and the cameras are lit

the clinton administration garbage coming out to haunt us. what happened with the uranium one deal and what happened with the clinton advisors in the fisa warrant process. something that should be sacred. there should be nothing in there but pure information. it was the worst kind of political garbage that went into the making of that. what a bullet we dodged. >> i say this to my democrat friend and even more so my never trump friend who are really some of them dear friends. i say can you imagine what this administration would be doing? think about this. if hillary clinton in that clinton campaign and that regime could spy on a billionaire presidential candidate that had a chance of becoming president of the united states. what do you think about rank and file average americans? the civil liberties questions raised -- in fact they are not questions,er in answers, and they are profound and quite scary. so thank you, lord, and thank you, donald trump for winning this election. david: gina i'll have to bring you back to give you a rain check. we

sarah: i can only imagine what the clinton administration with twitter would have looked like. mike: well, that is a good point. if we were a white house reporter, what would be better than to wake up and know exactly what is on the president's mind. you didn't have that with clinton or obama, but you have that with trump. you know what he is thinking about and what motivates him, for better or worse. personally, i think it is for the worse, but on the other hand, as a question of covering the white house and understanding what motivates the president, this guide gives you raw material that is unprecedented in the history of how we cover the white house, if you are a white house reporter. you know, i will refrain from partisan comment about what i think of it, but you cannot claim that it is not giving you more transparency. sarah: it gives a lot more stories. martha: we know our president well. mike: as you know, when you are trying to develop things, it is hard to communicate it from the white house and develop consistent storylines that gets people engaged and you are gettin

administration. >> the midterm defeat of two years earlier had been a slap in the face to president clinton, delivered by the american voters. but he'd been down that road before. >> as governor, in arkansas, he had veered left, and the voters had dealt him a rebuke. he adapted. >> bill clinton took that defeat in 1994 and he pivoted. he hired dick morris. he tried to re-establish himself in the voter's mind as a new democrat. >> with morris, clinton knew what he was getting -- a sharp political mind who had helped with his political comeback in arkansas. >> right after the election, he met with the democratic leaders. and they, in effect, told him, "you stay in the pocket, and we'll protect you." you know how football quarterbacks stay in the pocket with their blockers surrounding them? >> but bill clinton's political talents presented a unique opportunity. >> he loved being a politician. i mean, he loved going around, meeting people, smiling. and he loved making a difference. if he died and went to

there were things i found out about the clinton administration that i still to this day would not reveal publicly because it would be embarrassing to the office that i was working under. as an fbi agent. but these individuals see that it's their mission to be politically active in their job. that's horrific. i'm hoping, again, that this was the problem and administrative problem. what happens is you call the fbi, it's not a 911 system, some duty agent or support person answerts the phone, try and route your phone call to the people most appropriate to handle it. that might be a very junior agent or very senior agent. but it might be somebody that doesn't know what to do with the information. in this case it would seem it would be likely if the individual you're talking about is in miami that you would tell the miami division. so a lead could be generated for agents to follow up. obviously that never happened. and lives were lost because of it. >> tucker: they were busy tracking down the fake russian twitter accounts. tim, thank you for that, appreciate your experienced view. almost every

in fact, the only administration where we paid down the debt in the last several decades was the clinton administration when there was a republican congress and democratic president. we had several years where the debt went down. most other demonstrations -- of their administrations, it has been a steady increase. most parties have the spending or the tax side adding to this. was ax plan republican-driven up rent that added to the debt by all objective analyses. the plan now is a bipartisan deal, so both parties are signing on to the debt increases. when our policy makers going to make the difficult choices for the next generation that will help us control the debt had and put us on a more sustainable fiscal path? host: ralph? caller: tying into that, i do not think we will find a responsible formula. the government is so corrupted that they are not capable of balancing the budget. the latest thing, deferred tax where all of the hedge fund managers get taxed at 15% of their salary. on top of that we cut down the top tax bracket to 35%, yet we have a 15% tax on capital gains. which is whe

going back to the immigration study, with the clinton administration 1985 put out by the democratic so dealing with with merit-based immigration and having harry over decades. what i have heard there is no time to do any of those things. we cannot even discuss anyone else. early but now we get down to the data there are those for simple they have untold number of hearings on these issues to get legislation ready and get results. i will focus on a few things because a few of us found a proposal over those four areas that was middle ground certainly not everything i would like with border security and certainly not everything the b democrats would like to have but it is a middle ground for the white house said they will sign with 1.8 million people moving into naturalizationid citizenship. these are the individuals that came, their prayers checked them at the time. those individuals so for them to offer an opportunity to become a citizen. >> in that ten year time. more security could be put in place that is not unreasonable. and then how does that affect the process? first right now we h

. >> he served as the deputy secretary of the interior in bill clinton's administration. >> these are known problems. >> we dug through the inspection records for all seven dams and while each said it was satisfactory for use, we found similar concerns for those noted in oroville's before the dam filled. cracks and voids in san bernardi bernardino. plumas, settling in the dam itself. in los angeles cracking, spaling and erosion in the spillway at pyramid damage. >> we don't have the adequate resources to maintain it. >> these former employees both say the issues show a culture of inattenti inattention, lack of follow up. both men asked them to hide their identities for fear they would lose their pensions for speaking out. >> they don't have adequate technical staff to do the scope of what's required. >> has california kept up with the maintenance as it should? >> no. the infrastructure has not been maintained. >> inspection records show issues have gone unaddressed for years. things such as broken sump pumps not repaired for more than four years. the reports also show that the earth a

just ask the clinton administration. more than a year into bill clinton first year, nearly 100 had no security clearance at all according to press reports in '94. scandal wrote to then cia director james woolsey in march of 1994, what specific steps have you taken to ensure information classified to protect intelligence sources has not been made available to individuals on the white house staff who do not have appropriate clearances. nearly one-third of all staff lacked permanent grounds and building passes. next in illinois. >> okay. i'll try to keep to the subject. when i was in school, we had rtc. we had home ed. how to cook food. how to raise your baby. all that stuff. right. i think we should have that here. you are blaming parents and teachers. and the truth is it's the schools itself. what has to be done, somehow maybe the force maybe has to teach kids in school, maybe the military has to teach kids in school, maybe the first responders have to teach kids in school starting from kindergarten, artists and musics an

if you want to go back to the immigration study led by the clinton administration in 1995, there was a proposal put out by barbara jordan, the democratic house member from texas who led that particular study during the clinton administration dealing with chain migration, dealing with how do we have transitions on merit-based immigration. this has been dealt with literally with hearings for decades. but what i've heard for the past several months is, there's no time to do any of those things. the only time that we have is to deal with daca. we can't discuss anything else. meeting after meeting after meeting, since early november i've heard the same thing. there's no time, there's no time, there's no time. now we're getting down to the day and there's still a conversation about how do we deal with these four simple issues we've talked about for months. the house and senate have debated for decades. we've had untold number of hearings on for decades on these issues to try to actually land them, to get legislation ready, and to get this resolved. let me just focus on a few things because

and former clinton administration official peter edelman argued that u.s. courts are using fines and fees to exploit the economically impoverished. in the coming weeks on "after words," black lives matter cofounder pennsylvania reese congressing colors will discuss the birth and growth of the movement, and this weekend on "after words," former george w. bush white house speech writer david frum will argue that the trump administration is damaging democracy. >> who are they? who are the enablers? how do you break them down? >> let's start with concentric circles. first, there are those who immediately serve him who lie for him. and i think, i mean, often for, understandably, the noble reasons like h.r. mcmaster lying to conceal the fact the president of the united states does not want to honor the nato treaty. they are the larger executive to branch, outside the white house. the department of justice and fbi, staffed with people like rod rosenstein. they've never seen -- rod rosenstein seems like a conscientious and not very imaginative person struggling to

administration but fit with the trump administration's america first message that we dollar policy could backfire and make us assets like treasuries less appealing and drive up the cost of foreign goods for businesses and everyday americans you know well this is a policy around the world beggar thy neighbor but try to drive your currency lower to help your exports and grab global market share and china's been the king of the . for a long time so this is a take in a china directly saying oh yeah you think you. will make the dollar even cheaper so it makes us you know higher value versus a dollar which may it's more difficult for them to export their way into global domination so now our currency wars venturing a new phase you know donald trump obviously has a lot more understanding of how to fight this currency war than anyone coming before him barack obama was really a novice coming into office knew nothing about finance he was financially illiterate as he proved over and over again and the shop knows the rules of the game whether he's successful or not we'll see well you know in the sec

this was during the clinton administration. what we're dealing with here is politicians who are grandstanding to certain extent, i think -- rand paul to be exact -- i don't think he's without hair. but we are dealing with -- compare. what we are dealing with here is a fundamental problem that we have found, and doesn't have anything to do with donald trump, parties. it really has to do with the andtionality of government, how we have sort of lost touch in theat our role is functionality of government. speaks to mes what whe i see this type of thing, when i see the government shutdown in the 90's which was a different story, but now you see this divide, and it speaks to me more now than it did then. there wasn't a divide that. there was, but there were ways to get along party lines, in terms of functionality. now, it seems like it's all broken down. it's really sad to see, honestly. host: james from alexandria, right outside d.c.. but set out to independents, california. connor on the line from republicans. hi, connor. caller: i

administration in nato enlargement president obama always engaged mr putin a spirit of logic and the logic that we saw in the relationship was not necessarily the same logic that mr putin saw when somebody is trying to assure you listen i come with my tanks i come with my you know military equipment to your big heart but because that is not against you would you believe and then there was also i think a geo political argument that the west should take advantage of this time to move east and to make sure that poland and hungary and a stone are for ever outside russia's sphere of influence free states should be able to say we're in nato our not in nato we're in the e.u. we're not in the e.u. who is russia to tell them how they should behave. the deployment of the missile defense system was no longer negotiable that's what obama told putin the press conference was frigid. it was good to be. noticed he also discussed international up at all interested parties in trying to find a resolution to this problem. from obama's point of view how important was putin the leader of a country with a

the obama administration was perplexed by this unprecedented attack. how do you defend yourself against it. a cyber attack on russian infrastructure is was under consideration. we spend a lot of time on to decide whether there should be some. price paid for what they've already done some punishment. that last piece we thought could wait and we could think we could work on it and think about it the most important thing was to get them to stop and prevent them from doing it again. the white house decided to treat the case with the utmost secrecy. because we thought the main russian objective was to create doubt and accelerate a crisis of credibility and legitimacy about our institutions we have to be very careful in how we talked about this in public because even if we had said the president had said this is what they're trying to do but they won't succeed it still might have created the very doubt russia was trying to so they thought that hillary clinton would win under any circumstances they didn't want to. develop a whole new political issue last sick

it took an awful long time, didn't happen during the clinton administration, to get those--those bills--uh, those bills passed. capehart: 2000 rolls around, and it's vice president al gore versus then-texas governor george w. bush. you had maybe visions of serving at a higher capacity in a gore administration, but, as we all know, that did not happen. al gore went down to defeat, um, so you couldn't be janet reno's-- holder: i'm not sure he actually went down to defeat, but for purposes of this conversation, we'll say that. all right. capehart: yes. he did not become president of the united states, is what i mean. [applause] as a result of al gore not becoming president of the united states... holder: mm-hmm. capehart: you toyed with the idea of running for mayor of washington. holder: i did. capehart: first, why? holder: mm-hmm. capehart: and there's a part two. holder: well, you know, i--this is a city that i love. i thought that there were things that i could contribute, given the relatively unique experiences that i had as a judge, as a u.s. attorney. it seemed to me that the poten

administration but fit with the trump administration's america first message that we dollar policy could backfire and make us assets like treasuries less appealing and drive up the cost of foreign goods for businesses and everyday americans you know well this is a policy around the world beggar thy neighbor but try to drive your currency lower to help your exports and global market share and china's been the king of this. for a long time so this is a take in a china directly saying oh yeah you think you. will make the dollar even cheaper so it makes un you know higher in value versus a dollar which may it's more difficult for them to export their way into global domination so now our currency wars venturing a new phase you know donald trump obviously has a lot more understanding of how to fight this currency war than anyone coming before him barack obama was really a novice coming into office knew nothing about finance he was financially illiterate as he proved over and over again and the shop knows the rules of the game whether he's successful or not we'll see well you know in the secon

the clinton administration, extreme violence broke out. gasp, if itlast were, of the cold war. the americans were very much involved in the peace process in dane ohio, the dayton accords. but the region was very much still on the focus of the administration. it was a hotspot. secretary of state madeleine albright was very much aware of what was going on in the region. >> she was. she managed the response in coordination with some of her foreign minister counterparts, and she held an almost daily conference call with the foreign ministers, and she later termed it conference call diplomacy to help manage the conflict. they coordinated and worked quite well together. at the end of secretary albright's tenure in january 2001, she and her conference call diplomacy counterparts together for dinner in paris to celebrate the end of secretary albright's tenure and she was presented with gifts. this russian porcelain coffee set was a gift from the russian foreign minister. as you can see, on each of the cups is the image of albright and her foreign minister counterparts. these include ig

administration which kept what you could write off they get the stock option so i predicted they would do that last fall and they're buying a lot of stock back so of course you know apple is happy because they had hundreds of billions of dollars caught up in this or at least tens of billions and very wealthy people are happy and anyone that has an s. corp is happy because they changed the rules there and you had an s. corporate also you might decide to make a c. chord now because heck your tax rate went to twenty one percent so to. twenty eighteen now mean this is playing well to the crowd yes. democratic party grain kind of laying out the the lay of the land for us and twenty sixteen and looking at what was contributing to that dynamic in that election what can we look forward to in twenty seen in a nafta is nafta now back in play is this part of the mix well it depends what president trump decides to do it meaning he certainly pulled out of the deal in asia immediately that obama had been working on and obviously a lot of progressives oppose so it's highly likely that he's going to t

, the clinton administration and previous administrations, won't work with this one. >> their new leader was going to come in and was in favor of sunshine policy it was referred to but then you hear china sending 300,000 troops to the border so they have a different take on what is going on. >> sign understand how serious the united states is, donald trump gave a tough statement during the state of the union about north korea. he spent a chunk of the speech just talking about the nature of the regime, how terrible and barbaric the regime is that it is because of that the united states can't hold americans to be sausage with nuclear weapons and mike pence is bringing auto warmdear's father to be opening ceremonies, he was tortured in north korea until he died. what that communicates to north korea and south korea is the united states takes this seriously. we are committed to the campaign to ensure north korea does not to keep these nuclear weapons after this administration is out of office. heather: a remarkable moment during the state of the union address not only with auto warmbeer's pa

. >> and continuing with priorities here, during the clinton administration, extreme violence broke out in sarajevo, with the breakup of yugoslavia. kind of the last gasp of the cold war. so the americans were very much involved in the peace process in dayton, ohio, the dayton accord ended that war. but the region was very much still on the focus of the administration. secretaryot spot, and of state madeleine albright was very much aware of what was going on in the region. >> she was. she managed the response and coordination with some of her foreign minister counterparts, and she held an almost daily conference call with these foreign ministers, and later "conference call diplomacy" to help manage this conflict. they coordinated and works quite well together, and at the end of secretary's albright's tenure in and her2001, she conference call diplomacy counterparts gathered for dinner in paris to celebrate the end of secretary albright's tenure. she was presented with gifts, as it were. this spectacular russian porcelain set, coffee set, was a gift by the russian foreign minister igor e

i know what we did a similar study during the clinton administration, we release it publicly. i think i was a deputy attorney general at the time. i think we released it. i do not know what happened within the department and whether the work was completed or a decision to release, i just do not know what happened. i mean, i have spoken out about the death penalty. at that we have the greatest system of rljustice in the worl. our system of justice is comprised of men and women who you know, that they are judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, jurors, are trying to do their best.but human beings make mistakes. we know that we have seen mistakes made in cases that were noncapital in nature. and it is one thing, it is an awful thing, one of the last cases i worked on as -- before he came attorney general, a man was convicted of rape of something he had not done and he served 19 years. the person was mentally handicapped. served 19 years. we got him out of jail given a substantial amount of money from the state. you cannot reverse the death penalty mistake. that has always been th

administration which kept what you could write off they get the stock option so i predicted they would do that last fall and they're buying a lot of stock back so of course you know apple's happy because they had hundreds of billions of dollars caught up in this or at least tens of billions and very wealthy people are happy and anyone that has an s. corp is happy because they changed the rules there and you had an s. corporate also you might decide to make a c. chord now because heck your tax rate went to twenty one percent so. twenty eighteen now mean this is playing well to the crowd yes. democratic party grain kind of laying out the the lay of the land for us and twenty sixteen and looking at what was contributing to that dynamic in that election what can we look forward to in twenty seen in a nafta is nafta now back in play is this part of the mix well it depends what president trump decides to do it i mean he certainly pulled out of the deal in asia immediately that obama had been working on and obviously a lot of progressives oppose so it's highly likely that he's going to try to

administration but fit with the trump administration's america first message that we dollar policy could backfire and make us assets like treasuries less appealing and drive up the cost of foreign goods for businesses and everyday americans. while this is a policy around the world beggar thy neighbor by trying to drive your currency lower to help your exports and global market share and china's been the king of the . for a long time so this is they take in a child directly saying oh yeah you think you. will make the dollar even cheaper so it makes us you know higher in value versus the dollar which may it's more difficult for them to export their way into global domination so now our currency wars venturing a new phase you know donald trump obviously has a lot more understanding of how to fight this currency war than anyone coming before him barack obama was really a novice coming into office knew nothing about finance he was financially illiterate as he proved over and over again and the shop knows the rules of the game whether he's successful or not we'll see well you know in the secon

and even clinton administration, has really caused for this? >> i tried -- i know we don't have much time so i'll say quickly i really try to do that in the book. >> the short is the one that was worn on may 1st, 20010 in front of the white house as we were getting arrested, pressuring obama. >> we have time for just one more. >> congratulations, laura, and thank you so much for writing this very important book. my can he he -- my question is for filipe. as a syrian, the struggle in syria does not seem like it's ending anytime soon so there's time is lose hope, and then i have to rye mind myself, there's light at the end of this tunnel. what is that light for you? does it exist and what is it if it does? >> that's a very deep question. i try not be jaded. that's one thing that i try really hard. think about it a lot. that i have seen defeat. i've seen victory. i've seen change that i did not expect. and then change that i kind of expected. but one thing that really keeps me grounded, if i want to be really honest with you, is my close friends w

is interested in that's not what the obama and the clinton administration are rested and they don't care they just want to get something inactive and it's a little bit sick cynical i know but look guys i've seen this movie to see it before. that's it for this time thanks for watching be sure to catch bill bastone you tube you tube dot com slash boom bust archie see tomorrow. i. thought. for most illusional news but. this news the first thing in the room with them which is this mission on the photo shows a. little bit some of it is just some awesome trying. to put down play you have to gather some odd to see. the games have begun the younger sister of north korea's ruler kim jong un has captured the attention of the media while the u.s. vice president mike pence was mocked as a dud even undiplomatic the two koreas are engaging each other. international recognition with the help of israel at least in the. palestinian. things. only. thirty. third. the dutch foreign minister revealing that he lied about a meeting with the russian president in two thousand and six. spoke about a greater

i could see no way he could have weapons expections through the last two years of clinton's administration. there has been global warming a long time ago way up high. that is one of the last things that melted going through illinois. guest: let me say on the global all knowart, first we that over the history of the earth we have had extremes and major ice ages and warmths and the like. the point is that the earth has never seen, certainly since humans have been on earth, we have never seen these kinds of changes. hat is the change that we are seeing in terms of putting carbon dioxide into the rapidlyre occurring compared to the previous geological time scales. frankly, our earth systems don't have time to adjust. we are seeing something like zika virus. those the skin does have a range much further north than was ever the case. droughts. all of these patterns. the extreme impasse of hurricanes in the gulf and florida. these are long predicted patterns playing out in front of our eyes. through their reality is that we need to balance mitigation by cutting down greenhouse gas emissions again