justice brennan, justice marshall. he was someone who was a big leader. to be very fair, as a leader of that branch. >> he also had a very even way of dealing with things. as an individual or associate justice, he had a constitutional vision which ended up being in the majority, and for that reason, at historians will look back and see the important role he played. but he also did not give so wrapped up in the result he favors, that he left out the fact of personal relationships, whatever the assignments, you move on. these other cases, you lost on that one. he did not view his world to be so personally injected. >> he was wonderful. one reason that people keep this praise on him from the other end of the political spectrum is because he personally charmed so many colleagues and so many people he dealt with, surprising to the public often times. they did not really understand what kind of man he was. finally, he will be famous and remembered, because he did preside over term in the dark and of the court. as david said, in an associate capacity. he was cal