International Journal of Human Resource
Management and Research (IJHRMR)
ISSN (P): 2249-6874; ISSN (E): 2249-7986
Vol. 10, Issue 1, Feb 2020, 65-72
© TJPRC Pvt. Ltd.
ROLE OF WORK PLACE POLITICS IN EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE - WITH
REFERENCE TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECTOR
GOWTHAM RAMKUMAR
Assistant Professor, Department of Commerce (Aided), Madras Christian College, East Tambaram,
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
ABSTRACT
The achievement of organizational objectives depends on employee performance. The performance of employees is
dependent on many factors. While organization takes utmost efforts in motivating employees to make them achieve
desired performance, a significant factor which impacts employee both physically and mentally is power and politics. The
political behavior of organization and even employees themselves can hinder the growth of the organization. Power and
politics can create an unhealthy work environment. An unhappy work environment can demotivate employees to perform
their job and affect employee’s productivity. While positive political behavior can bring in good results, often
organizations face adverse consequences due to political behavior among its employees. Power and politics make it
difficult for organization to achieve employee retention. This research study seeks to study the impact of work place
politics on employee performance and arrives at a meaningful conclusion which can be used as basis for further research
in these areas.
KEYWORDS: Work Place Politics, Employee Performance, Employee Retention & Organizational Objectives
Received: Oct 21, 2019; Accepted: Nov 11, 2019; Published: Jan 22, 2020; Paper Id.: 1JHRMRFEB202010
INTRODUCTION
Power elements in organizations identify with political substances of intensity obtaining organizations and the
particular political method in power securing. One point of view of political conduct is, enormous organizations
resemble governments, as they are on a very basic level of political substances. Political conduct in the organization
alludes to those exercises not required by one's formal job definition in the organizations. Political viewpoint of
association leaves from the old style hopeful, discerning association. Four hypothesizes of intensity by Walter Nod
center around political substances in the association. One, associations are made out of contending alliances.
Second, different alliances look to ensure their interests and positions. Third, inconsistent power circulation has
dehumanizing impact. Fourth, practicing power inside association.
Hierarchical individuals embrace various methodologies to obtain control. Durkin recommended
methodologies recorded underneath assistance to increase further bits of knowledge into power and legislative
issues in the associations.
• Keep up union with influential individuals - Alliances with individuals from other significant offices or of
top administration or with manager's secretary or staff aide are basic to obtaining of intensity.
• Grasp or Demolish - The controlling Machiavellian rule is that ranking directors in the assumed control
over firms ought to be invited and supported or sacked. To make them feeble it is smarter to sack them
TRANS
STELLAR
•Journal Publications • Research Consultancy
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
Original Article
66
Gowtham Ramkumar
than to minimize them. Whenever downsized, they join and battle back.
• Partition and Rule - This is a well known methodology dependent on the suspicion however outlandish, that
people separated will not themselves structure alliance.
• Control characterized data Organizational individuals skilled in governmental issues control data in order to pick
up power.
• Make a snappy appearing - Looking great on some venture or assignment directly toward the start is to stand out
enough to be noticed. When this positive consideration is picked up, control is procured to accomplish
progressively troublesome and long-extend ventures.
• Gather and Use IOUs - Do favors to others with clear understanding that they should pay consequently when
inquired.
• Keep away from definitive commitment - Also called Fabianism: Be moderate, yet sure to wind up dug in and
gain collaboration and trust of others.
• Advancement slowly and carefully - One little change can be a dependable balance for power searcher to utilize it
as a premise to get other real things achieved.
• Hang tight for an emergency - It depends on the supposition that things must deteriorate before they turn better.
Emergency conditions bring more assets that encourage holding over emergency.
• Consult Caution - This identifies with how to hold control instead of how to obtain it. For instance, remedies like
participative administration and strengthening are to be taken with alert as they dissolve the power base of
administrators.
Thus from the above theoretical foundation it is clear that how power contributes to political behavior in the
organizations. With this background, this paper seeks to study the relationship between politics and employee performance.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Salimaki and Jamsen (2010) found that perceptions of politics and fairness distinctively and interactively predicted whether
the pay system was perceived as effective in achieving its objectives. The results of them also suggested that some forms of
politics in performance appraisals (e.g. compression) might be perceived less detrimental than others (e.g. favoritism).
Vigoda-Gadot and Meisler (2010) supported a moderating role of emotional intelligence in the relationship
between organizational politics and emotional commitment, as well as between organizational politics and employees’
absenteeism.
Chang et al. (2009) tested a model that links perceptions of organizational politics to job performance and
“turnover intentions” (intentions to quit). Meta-analytic evidence supported significant, bivariate relationships
between perceived politics and strain (0.48), turnover intentions (0.43), job satisfaction (20.57), affective
commitment (20.54), task performance (20.20), and organizational citizenship behaviors toward individuals (20.16)
and organizations (20.20). Additionally, results demonstrated that work attitudes mediated the effects of perceived
politics on employee turnover intentions and that both attitudes and strain mediated the effects of perceived politics
Impact Factor (JCC): 7.9089
NAAS Rating: 3.38
Role of Work Place Politics in Employee Performance - With 67
Reference to Information Technology Sector
on performance. Finally, from their findings exploratory analyses provided evidence that perceived politics represent
a unique hindrance stressor.
Chen and Fang (2008) investigated the complexities in the relationship between perceptions of organizational
politics and performance ratings by examining the moderating effect of impression management on that relationship.
Expectancy theory was employed to better understand the moderating effect. They proposed that two kinds of impression
management tactics occurred: supervisor-focused and job-focused, respectively. Hierarchical moderated regression
analysis of data revealed that the job-focused tactics exerted a significant moderating effect on the relationship between
perceptions of organizational politics and performance ratings. When perceptions of organizational politics are low,
employees who engage in high levels of job-focused impression management tactics are more likely to gain better ratings
than those who employ low-level tactics (Chen and Fang, 2008).
Nurse (2005) results confirmed the hypothesis that workers who believed that performers were not treated fairly
as a result of performance appraisal would also agree that their expectations regarding development and advancement were
not being met. We found significant, but relatively moderate relationships between perceptions about treatment of
performers and their expectations about career advancement.
Objectives of the Study
The objectives of the study are as follows
• To understand the employees perception about organizational politics.
• To understand the employee perceptions about employee performance
• To analyze cause and effect relationship between work place politics and employee performance
• To offer suggestions on improving work environment.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The data required for this study is collected from both primary and secondary sources.
Type of Research
This research study is a quantitative research study. A quantitative research study is a study where a problem which is
being studied by the researcher is supported by generating data which can be later converted into usable statistics giving
meaningful conclusion.
Sources of Data
Primary Data
Primary sources are the sources that are collected originally rather than being already made available. The data obtained
from these sources are called primary data. The primary data for the study is collected through survey method using
structured questionnaire. The primary data often is available in raw form which is then processed to make itself suitable for
further analysis to arrive at meaningful conclusion.
Secondary Data
The secondary sources represent those data made available in a suitable form to lend itself for further analysis. Often they
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc. org
68
Gowtham Ramkumar
do not require any processing and can be used for analysis purpose. The Secondary data for the research is collected
through journals, magazines and books relating to economic effects of taxes on the economy.
Sampling Design
Sample Size
The sample size for the study is 100 respondents from Chennai city. The sample size for the study is arrived through G-
power statistics 3.1 software which helps in determining the sample size based on the analytical tool used for the study.
Sampling Technique
This research study is based on simple random sampling method. This sampling technique gives each element an equal and
independence chance of being selected rather than pre-determining the samples to be selected.
Sampling Unit
The sampling unit for the study is the employees of Information Technology sector in Chennai. Therefore, other sector
employees do not represent the sampling unit for the study.
Statistical Design
The analysis for this study has been carried out through IBM SPSS Version 22 Software. The analytical tool used for the
study were descriptive analysis and multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Table 1: Employee Perception towards Organizational Factors Contributing
to Political Behavior in Work Place
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
There is lack of promotion opportunities in the
organizations
100
1.00
5.00
4.7500
1.00000
Level of trust in organization is low
100
1.00
5.00
3.5625
1.63172
There is lack of role clarity among employees in
organization
100
3.00
5.00
4.3125
.94648
There is a centralized decision making more of an
autocratic nature
100
2.00
5.00
4.3750
.95743
Management supports/ignores political behaviors
of employees
100
3.00
5.00
4.5000
.73030
Valid N (listwise)
100
Interpretation
Table 1 reveals the employee’s perceptions towards organizational factors contributing to political behavior in work place.
From the above table it is clear that lack of promotion opportunities is the major factor which triggers political behavior in
the work place. It is indicated by the highest mean score of 4.75. Followed by it, management either supporting or ignoring
political behavior of employees is the second most factor influencing political behavior in organizations. It is supported by
a mean score of 4.50. The other factors encouraging political behavior are lack of role clarity, centralized decision making
and low level of trust among employees in the organization. The same is supported by mean scores of 4.3125, 4.3750 and
3.5625 respectively.
Impact Factor (JCC): 7.9089
NAAS Rating: 3.38
Role of Work Place Politics in Employee Performance - With
Reference to Information Technology Sector
69
Table 2: Employee Perception towards Individual Factors Contributing to
Political Behaviour in Work Place
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
People with high need for power engagement in political
behavior.
100
2.00
5.00
4.3125
1.01448
Individuals with internal locus of control exhibit high
political behavior
100
2.00
5.00
3.6250
.80623
High performance measures creates political behavior
100
3.00
5.00
4.0000
.81650
Low success rate pushes an individual towards political
behavior
100
3.00
5.00
3.9375
.77190
Perceived job alternatives allows individuals to engage in
political behavior
100
3.00
5.00
3.8125
.83417
Valid N (listwise)
100
Interpretation
Table 2 displays the employee perceptions towards organizational factors contributing to political behavior in work place.
From the above table it is clear that people’s need for power is the major factor which triggers political behavior in work
place. It is indicated by the highest mean score of 4.3125. Followed by it, high performance measures is the second most
factor influencing political behavior in organizations. It is supported by a mean score of 4.00. The other factors
encouraging political behavior are low success rate, perceived job alternatives and internal locus of control among
employees in the organization. The same is supported by mean scores of 3.9375, 3.8125 and 3.6250 respectively.
Table 3: Employee Perception towards Organizational Factors Affecting
Productivity/Performance in Organization
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Downsizing Strategies by the Company
100
1.00
5.00
4.0000
1.15470
Organization’s Culture
100
3.00
5.00
3.8750
.80623
lob Design
100
3.00
5.00
4.1250
.80623
Resource Allocation
100
1.00
5.00
3.8125
1.10868
Valid N (listwise)
100
Interpretation
Table 3 reveals the employee perceptions towards organization factors contributing to employee performance in work
place. From the above table it is clear that Job Design is the major factor which contributes to employee performance. It is
indicated by the highest mean score of 4.125. Followed by it. Downsizing strategies followed by organization is the second
most factor influencing employee in organizations. It is supported by a mean score of 4.00. The other organizational factors
contributing to employee performance are the organization’s culture and Resource allocation by organizations among
employees in the organization. The same is supported by mean scores of 3.875 and 3.815 respectively.
Table 4: Employee Perception on Managerial factors Affecting your
Productivity/Performance in Organization
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Management Style
100
1.00
5.00
4.1250
1.14746
Organization’s commitment towards employee
100
1.00
5.00
3.5000
.89443
Performance Appraisal System
100
2.00
5.00
3.7500
1.18322
Career Development Opportunities by organization
100
2.00
5.00
3.6250
.80623
Valid N (listwise)
100
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
70
Gowtham Ramkumar
Interpretation
Table 4 reveals employee perceptions towards managerial factors contributing to employee performance in work place.
From the above table it is clear that management style is the major factor which triggers political behavior in work place. It
is indicated by the highest mean score of 4.125. Followed by it, performance appraisal system followed by organization is
the second most factor influencing political behavior in organizations. It is supported by a mean score of 3.75. The other
organizational factors contributing to employee performance are organizational commitment and career development
opportunities by organizations among employees in the organization. The same is supported by mean scores of 3.500 and
3.625 respectively.
Table 5: Employee Perception on Individual Factors Affecting one’s
Productivity/Performance in Organization
Descriptive Statistics
N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Knowledge, Skills and Attitude of Employees
100
2.00
5.00
4.3750
1.02470
Work Life Balance
100
2.00
4.00
3.5625
.62915
Personal problems of Employees
100
2.00
5.00
3.7500
.93095
Personal Motivation and Commitment
100
3.00
5.00
3.6250
.61914
Valid N (listwise)
100
Interpretation
Table 5 reveals the employee perceptions towards organizational factors contributing to employee performance in work
place. From the above table it is clear that management style is the major factor which triggers political behavior in work
place. It is indicated by the highest mean score of 4.125. Followed by it, performance appraisal system followed by
organization is the second most factor influencing political behavior in organizations. It is supported by a mean score of
3.75. The other organizational factors contributing to employee performance are organizational commitment and career
development opportunities by organizations among employees in the organization. The same is supported by mean scores
of 3.500 and 3.625 respectively.
HYPOTHESIS 1
H 0 - There is no significant relationship between workplace politics and employee performance.
11 j - There is a significant relationship between workplace politics and employee performance.
Table 6: The Model Summary
Model Summary 5
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
Change Statistics
Durbin-Watson
R Square
Change
F Change
Sig. F Change
1
.392 a
.154
.093
3.88565
.154
2.542
.133
1.710
a. Predictors: (Constant), Workplace politics
b. Dependent Variable: Employee performance
Table 6 reveals the results of the regression analysis to study the cause and effect relationship between work
place politics and employee performance. The Employee performance is considered as the dependent variable and
work place politics is considered as the independent variable. From the above table, it is clear that work place politics
alone does not significantly determines employee performance. This is indicated by p-value of 0.133 indicating lower
Impact Factor (JCC): 7.9089
NAAS Rating: 3.38
Role of Work Place Politics in Employee Performance - With 71
Reference to Information Technology Sector
level of significance acceptable at 1% level. It is also supported by the R square change which is 0.154, indicating
that 15.4% of the variation in the employee performance is indicated by work place politics. Similarly, Durbin-
Watson value is 1.710, which is more than 1 and not greater than 3, also supports this regression model. Factor R of
multiple cross correlation of 39.2% indicate high cross correlation which is lesser than acceptable significance level.
Table 6.1: The ANOYA
ANOVA 3
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
38.375
1
38.375
2.542
.133 b
Residual
211.375
14
15.098
Total
249.750
15
a. Dependent Variable: Employee performance
b. Predictors: (Constant), Workplace politics
Interpretation
Table 6.1 reveals the results of ANOVA. The hypothesis is further tested by ANOVA table. Since the computed p-value
0.133 is greater than the acceptable significance value of 0.01, it is concluded that work place politics has no significant
influence in determining employee performance. Thus the alternate hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.
Table 6.2: The Coefficients Table
Coefficients 3
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients
t
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
32.573
8.556
3.807
.002
Work place politics
.329
.206
.392
1.594
.133
a. Dependent Variable: Employee performance
Interpretation
Table 6.2 reveals the co-efficient table of the regression analysis. From the above table, regression equation can be derived
Y = 32.90 + 0.329X!
Y is the Employee performance and X, work place politics. Thus based on the beta scores, it is clear that work
place politics have positive relationship with employee performance. Thus it is clear that work place politics is influencing
employee performance but less significant compared to other factors affecting employee performance. From the above
table it is clear that work place politics influences employee performance with 32.9%.
CONCLUSIONS
From the results and discussions it is clear that, work place politics impacts employee performance but less significant in
determining the success of the employee. It is also that management style, people’s need for power, lack of promotion
opportunities contributes to the political behavior in the organization. Political behavior can emotionally influence the
employee. Freshers will really find it difficult to tackle the political behaviours of the colleagues. Work place politics
should be kept at the lowest level in order to enable the organization to achieve better results.
SUGGESTIONS
• Management should not encourage political intentions of the employees.
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
72
Gowtham Ramkumar
• Performance Appraisal and Career Development policies have to be clearly communicated by the employees.
• Senior employees should provide necessary support to junior employees.
REFERENCES
1. Chang, C.-H., Rosen, C. and Levy, P. (2009), “The relationship between perceptions of organizational politics and employee
attitudes, strain, and behavior: a meta-analytic examination ’ Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 52 No. 4, pp. 779-801.
2. Salimaki, A. and Jamsen, S. (2010), “Perceptions of politics and fairness in merit pay’’, Journal of Managerial Psychology,
Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 229-51.
3. Tyagi, R. Validation of employee’s trust in leader’s scale in Indian IT sector.
4. Vigoda-Gadot, E. and Meisler, G. (2010), “Emotions in management and the management of emotions: the impact of
emotional intelligence and organizational politics on public sector employees”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70 No. 1,
pp. 72-86.
5. Nurse, L. (2005), “Performance appraisal, employee development and organizational justice: exploring the linkages”.
International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 1176-94.
6. Sreedevi, A. A study on employees perception towards work environment and inter-personnel relationship.
7. Menaria, S., & Shankar Chaudhary, A. (2017). Study on Work Life Balance of Moonlight Women Employees in IT Sector in
Pune Region. International Journal of Business and General Management (IJBGM), 6(5), 71-76.
8. Chen, Y.-Y. and Fang, W. (2008), “The moderating effect of impression management on the organizational politics-
performance relationship”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 79 No. 3, pp. 263-77.
AUTHOR PROFILE
Mr. Gowtham Ramkumar, is a part time Research Scholar at SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur
Chennai. He also works as Assistant Professor in the Department of Commerce (Aided), Madras Christian College where
he pursed his both Under graduation and Post-Graduation. His area of research interest includes Taxation, Accounting &
Finance and Management. He has received two best paper awards in both the national conferences in which he had
presented papers. He also serves as reviewer of notable national and international journals. Further, he is also a life
member of many research promoting and academic organizations. As a young faculty and research scholar, he has 6
citations to his profile and published around 30 papers in national journals. He is also providing statistical assistance for
data analysis using SPSS and AMOS.
Impact Factor (JCC): 7.9089
NAAS Rating: 3.38
