DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 481 767
HE 036 272
TITLE
INSTITUTION
PUB DATE
NOTE
AVAILABLE FROM
PUB TYPE
EDRS PRICE
DESCRIPTORS
IDENTIFIERS
Tuition and Fees at Virginia's State-Supported Colleges and
Universities, 2003-2004. A SCHEV Report.
Virginia State Council of Higher Education, Richmond.
2003-06-30
3 9p .
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, James Monroe
Building, 101 North Fourteenth Street, Richmond, VA 23219. Tel: 804-
225-2600; Fax: 804-225-2604; Web site: http://www.schev.edu.
Reports - Descriptive (141)
EDRS Price MF01/PC02 Plus Postage.
Access to Education; Budgets; Expenditure per Student; Higher
Education; *State Colleges; Student Costs; ^Tuition
^Virginia
ABSTRACT
This report summarizes: (1) planned increases in in-state
undergraduate tuition and mandatory educational and general (E&G) fees for the 2003-04
academic year (analyzing those increases as they relate to the tuition policy set
forth by the 2003 General Assembly) ; (2) changes in tuition and fees in Virginia over
the last 25 years; (3) cost sharing relationship between the state and in-state
undergraduate students; and (4) trends in tuition increases nationally and peer
comparisons. Findings include: the 2003 General Assembly established a tuition policy
that institutions shall not increase tuition and mandatory E&G fees for in-state
undergraduates by more than five percent in 2003-04 over the adjusted annualized 2002-
03 base tuition; the overall actual average increase for in-state undergraduate
tuition and mandatory E&G fees, without annualizing the mid-year increases, will be
19.3 percent from 2002-03 to 2003-04; and the fall, average tuition and mandatory E&G
charges will be less than they would have been had they increased by the rate of
inflation between 1995-96 and 2003-04. Appendixes include comparisons of changes in
tuition and fees for other student groups including in-state and out-of-state
undergraduate and graduate and in-state and out-of-state f irst-prof essional . (SM)
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
from the original document.
I
r--
\o
r-
oo
^r*
W
2003 - 2004
Tuition and Fees at
Virginia's State-Supported
Colleges & Universities
(Y\
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Office of Educational Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION
J CENTER (ERIC)
tD'H’his document has been reproduced as
received from the person or organization
originating it.
□ Minor changes have been made to
improve reproduction quality.
• Points of view or opinions stated in this
document do not necessarily represent
official OERI position or policy.
June 30, 2003
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND
DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS
BEEN GRANTED BY
j&rad {*£$_
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
H
STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR VIRGINIA
ADVANCING VIRGINIA THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
ii
o
r»
C
Introduction and Overview
1
Key Findings 2
Challenging Budget Conditions and Tuition Policy 5
A Look Back: Tuition Trends in Virginia 9
Sharing the Cost of Education 1 1
Other Mandatory Charges 12
Comparison of Tuition & Fee Rates in Other States 14
The Bottom Line for Students and Parents 16
Access and Affordability 19
Appendices 21
Appendix A - 2002-03 Full-Time, In-State,
Undergraduate Student Charges 21
Appendix B - 2002-03 Technology Fees 22
Appendix C - 2002-03 Full-Time Undergraduate
Mandatory Non-E&G Fees 23
Appendix D - 2001-03 Full-Time Student Charges,
by Student Residency and Program Level 25
D-1 : In-State Undergraduate 25
D-2: Out-of-State Undergraduate 26
D-3: In-State Graduate 27
D-4: Out-of-State Graduate 28
D-5: In-State First Professional 29
D-6: Out-of-State First Professional 30
Appendix E - Tuition and Fees in Selected States,
by Institution Type 30
Appendix F - Capital Fee to Out-of-State Students 33
Acknowledgements 34
Introduction and Overview
The Commonwealth of Virginia, like the rest of the nation, has been in an economic
recession since late 2001. Due to state budget shortfalls, the state funding to public
higher education institutions was reduced twice in 2002. The total state funding was
reduced by 22% from FY02 to FY04. In order to offset the reductions in state funding,
the eight-year tuition freeze on in-state undergraduate students was lifted and
institutions increased tuition twice in the 2002-03 academic year. As a result, the tuition
and mandatory educational and general (E&G) fees for in-state undergraduate students
were increased by 22%, on average, over 2001-02 levels. Concerned with rapid
increases in tuition and the impact on college affordability and access, the 2003 General
Assembly formulated a tuition policy with the following features:
■ In-state undergraduate tuition and mandatory educational and general fee
increases in FY04 shall not exceed 5% of the adjusted annualized FY03 base
tuition;
■ The cap on the tuition percentage increase does not apply to tuition increases
used to support the institutions’ share of salary increases and health costs;
■ Institutions may charge all other student groups a free market-determined
tuition and fee rate;
This report provides a summary of: 1) planned increases in in-state undergraduate
tuition and mandatory E&G fees for the 2003-04 academic year and analyzes those
increases as they relate to the tuition policy set forth by the 2003 General Assembly; 2)
changes in tuition and fees in Virginia over the last 25 years; 3) cost sharing relationship
between the state and in-state undergraduate students; 4) trends in tuition increases
nationally and peer comparisons. Comparisons of changes in tuition and fees for other
students groups including in-state graduate; out-of-state undergraduate; out-of-state
graduate; in-state first-professional, and out-of-state first professional are provided in
the appendices.
In order to assess trends in tuition and fees, it is important to understand higher
education pricing. A student planning to attend a public college or university in Virginia
can expect to pay the charges defined below:
1. Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees: Mandatory student charges used to
support instruction and related education activities included in the Educational
and General (E&G) program. E&G subprograms include instruction, research
and public service, academic support, student services, institutional support,
and operation and maintenance of physical plant.
2. Mandatory Non-E&G Fees: Mandatory student charges used to support
non-instructional activities such as student health services, athletics,
recreational activities, campus transportation, and capital debt service.
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
i 4
June 30, 2003
3. Tuition and All Fees: Sum of tuition, mandatory E&G fees, and mandatory
non-E&G fees.
4. Room and Board: Optional charges used to support the dormitory and
dining functions for students choosing to live on-campus. Students living off-
campus are exempted from these charges.
5. Total Cost: The total cost to students and parents - absent student financial
aid. It includes the sum of tuition, all mandatory fees, and room and board.
Although a change in any one of these areas clearly will impact the cost of attending
college, this report focuses primarily on changes to tuition and mandatory E&G fees as
well as changes to mandatory non-E&G fees. These two areas continue to generate
the most interest from the public policymakers. Changes in the other areas are
referenced only for national comparisons. Additional information is also included in the
appendices.
Key Findings
■ The 2003 General Assembly established a tuition policy that institutions shall
not increase tuition and mandatory E&G fees for in-state undergraduate
students by more than five percent in 2003-04 over the adjusted annualized
2002-03 base tuition . All institutions have complied with the tuition policy.
The average increase at four-year institutions will be 4.8% for the upcoming
academic year. At all institution levels, the average increase will be 4.1%.
■ The overall actual average increase for in-state undergraduate tuition and
mandatory E&G fees, without annualizing the mid-year increases, will be
19.3% from 2002-03 to 2003-04. The actual average increase at four-year
institutions will be 19.1% for the upcoming academic year. At the two-year
institutions, the actual average increase will be 21 .6%.
■ The impact of the Commonwealth’s eight-year policy to limit tuition increases
for in-state undergraduate students becomes clear when one considers
trends in tuition and fee increases since 1995-96. Between FY96 and FY02,
the period of tuition freezes and a rollback, tuition and mandatory E&G fees
for in-state undergraduate students decreased by 21% at both four-year
institutions and two-year institutions. From FY02 to FY04, the same charges
will increase by 46% at four-year institutions and 42% at two-year institutions.
■ This fall, average tuition and mandatory E&G charges will be less than they
would have been had they increased by the rate of inflation between 1995-96
(the year before the tuition freeze began) and 2003-04.
■ In addition to tuition and mandatory E&G fees, institutions establish required
fees to support non-instructional or related activities, such as student health
0
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
2
5
June 30, 2003
services, athletics, campus transportation, or debt service. These charges
(often referred to as mandatory non-E&G fees) will increase, on average
8.5% for in-state undergraduate students next year. Although these
increases exceed the five percent limit stipulated in the 2003 Appropriation
Act, the primary uses of the increased charges are for institutions’ share of
salary increases and health costs as well as debt service. These increases
are permitted under the tuition policy set forth by the 2003 General Assembly.
■ Looking at tuition and all fees, including mandatory E&G and mandatory non-
E&G fees, Virginia undergraduate students can expect to pay on average
15.1% more in 2003-04 than they did the prior year. Students at four-year
institutions will pay about $664 more in 2003-04. Community college
students will pay about $394 more this fall.
■ Despite the increases in tuition and all fees for 2003-04, the national rankings
of charges at Virginia’s four-year institutions are not likely to change
significantly. In 2002-03, in-state undergraduate tuition and fees at Virginia’s
flagship institution ranked 20 th highest nationally. Tuition and fees at other
public colleges and universities ranked 12 th . Since these rankings were
published, institutions in many states, including Virginia, enacted mid-year
tuition increases. Further, average increases for 2003-04 are expected to be
in the double digits nationally. If national increases for 2003-04 were
conservatively estimated to be the same as last year, Virginia’s four-year
institutions would move up in the rankings by 3 to 4 positions. In fact, they
may not increase at all once the national data are available.
■ Tuition and fees at Virginia’s community colleges have been among the
lowest nationally for several years. Their rank in 2002-03 was 44 th highest.
Their rank in the 2003-04 is expected to be significantly higher - but still
below the national average at about 30th.
■ Virginia has gained ground relative to national cost trends over the last
decade. For 2003-04, the total cost per capita disposable income is expected
to be at 36.6%, the same as in 1991-92, and lower than it has been in seven
of the last twelve years. Further, over the last decade, the percentage of
personal income consumed by the cost of higher education in Virginia has
moderated significantly, while the total cost as a percentage of per capita
disposable income has increased dramatically nationwide. Although it is
estimated the cost per capita disposable income will increase in Virginia due
to tuition and fee increases next year, the cost percentage is still lower than
that ten years ago and more in line with national averages.
■ Over the years, tuition charges to in-state undergraduate students in Virginia
have been largely influenced by the state’s economic situation. The
Commonwealth restricted tuition during the booming economy but allowed
institutions to assess double-digit tuition increases to offset general fund
o
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
3
June 30, 2003
reductions during economic recessions -- when students and their families
can least afford to pay. Although college education is more affordable today
for Virginia students than it was ten years ago (as measured by per capita
disposable income), this affordability was achieved through dramatic shifts in
cost sharing over the period, with varying degrees of equity depending on
when a student entered the system. The practice lacked continuity and
predictability, limited students and their families’ ability to save effectively for
college and did not provide equity for taxpayers in terms of meeting the cost
of education.
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
4
7
June 30, 2003
Challenging Budget Conditions and Tuition Policy
Due to the nationwide economic recession, the Commonwealth of Virginia experienced
a general fund budget shortfall in the 2002-04 biennium. In order to balance the state
budget as required by the Virginia Constitution, during the 2002 legislative session, the
Governor and General Assembly reduced general fund appropriations to all state
agencies including public higher education institutions. As a result, the state support to
the Educational and General (E&G) programs at public higher education institutions was
reduced by $153.1 million or 11.4% by FY04. To offset the reductions in the general
fund so as to maintain the quality of education at institutions, the Governor and General
Assembly lifted eight years of tuition restrictions on in-state undergraduate students, but
encouraged institutions to increase the in-state undergraduate tuition by no more than
9% for the 2002-03 academic year. The State Council of Higher Education for Virginia
(SCHEV)’s annual report of the 2002-03 Tuition and Fees at Virginia’s State-Supported
Colleges and Universities summarized the increases in tuition and fees by institution
and student type from FY02 to FY03.
However, impacted by a slower-than-expected economic recovery, the Governor, faced
with a growing state budget shortfall, had to further reduce the state appropriations for
the 2002-04 biennium in October 2002. The reductions affected most of the state
agencies and public higher education institutions as well. The budget cuts for each
college and university varied based on tuition level and percentage of students from
outside Virginia. To help offset the additional general fund reductions, institutions’
boards of visitors approved mid-year tuition increases for the spring semester of 2003.
The two consecutive budget cuts reduced the annual general fund support to E&G by
over $291 million in total ($153.1 million during the 2002 legislative session and an
additional $138.3 million in October), or 22% on average by FY04, compared to the
original FY02 appropriations. The total average tuition increase was 22% at all
institutional levels from FY02 to FY03. It is estimated that institutions were able to offset
approximately 56% of the general fund reduction with additional tuition increases in
FY03. It is projected that additional revenue generated from 2003-04 tuition increases
will be $218.5 million more than that in FY02, which is about 75% of the $291 million
reduction in general funding support to higher education.
Concerned with rapid increases in tuition and the impact on college affordability and
access, the 2003 General Assembly formulated a tuition policy, Item 136 E in the
Appropriation Act, that specifies:
El. a. Consistent with the authorization provided in § 4-2.01 b. of this act, the
boards of visitors or other governing bodies of institutions of higher education
shall determine tuition, fees, and charges for each fiscal year of the 2002-2004
biennium, provided that increases for in-state, undergraduate tuition and
mandatory educational and general fees for the 2003-04 academic year not
0
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
5
8
June 30, 2003
exceed five percent of the annualized tuition rates set by the boards for the 2002-
OS academic year.
b. Institutions shall apply comparable increases to all in-state, undergraduate
students. Institutions may charge all other student groups a free market-
determined tuition and fee rate.
c. For purposes of determining the annualized 2002-03 base tuition rate upon
which the five percent threshold shall be calculated, boards of visitors may apply
mid-year increases approved for the Spring 2003 semester to each semester of
the 2003-04 academic year. The tuition rates for 2003-04 shall not exceed 105
percent of the annualized 2002-03 base tuition level.
d. Institutions that adopted mid-year increases for the Spring 2003 semester that
were less than $225 and resulted in less than a $450 cumulative increase in
tuition over 2001-02 rates may adopt an adjusted annualized tuition rate upon
which the five percent threshold shall be calculated. For those institutions, boards
can apply up to $225 per semester for the 2003-04 academic year rather than
continuing the mid-year Spring 2003 increase for both semesters of the 2003-04
academic year. The tuition rates for 2003-04 shall not exceed 105 percent of the
adjusted annualized base tuition level.
e. In calculating increases for the 2003-04 academic year, Mary Washington
College and Virginia State University may exclude auxiliary fees that were
reclassified as part of the 2002-03 tuition actions.
f. The provisions herein shall not apply to increases in tuition used to support the
nongeneral fund share of the second year salary increases provided in Item 51 1
M of this act, health insurance costs included in Item 504 of this act, or related
costs associated with the University of Virginia's self-insured health plan. To the
extent institutions increase tuition to support these items, increases shall be
applied proportionately to all in-state and out-of-state students.
g. In the event that additional appropriation reductions for state-supported
colleges and universities are required pursuant to § 4-1 .04 of this act subsequent
to the enactment of this act, the Governor shall have the authority to exempt
institutions of higher education from the five percent limitation included in
paragraph E.I.a. above, provided such exemption is communicated in writing to
the Chairmen of the House Appropriations and Senate Finance Committees
within 10 days of such action.
2. In setting tuition and fee increases for each of the next two fiscal years, the
boards of visitors are directed to consider the following: (a) the consumer price
index; (b) in-state tuition charges of each institution's public peer group; (c) the
maximization of other revenues by setting tuition rates for out-of-state students,
graduate students and first professional students at market rate or higher without
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
6
3
June 30, 2003
adversely affecting the access of in-state students to Virginia's public colleges
and universities; (d) the reflection of the amortized cost of the construction and
renovation of buildings approved by the Commonwealth of Virginia Educational
Institutions Bond Act of 1992, the 21st Century College Trust and the Building
Virginia's Future capital improvement programs in the tuition and fee rates for
nonresident students; (e) the feasibility of setting aside a portion of the tuition
increase to provide additional financial aid resources, in combination with state,
federal, and private resources; (f) the impact of tuition increases on access and
the availability of student aid; and (g) the impact of a tuition increase on the
composition of the institution's applicant pool.
3. In determining tuition and fee charges, the boards of visitors or other
governing bodies of institutions of higher education shall (a) make every effort to
achieve potential cost savings as opposed to tuition increases and (b) not
increase the current proportion of nonresident undergraduate students if the
institution's nonresident undergraduate enrollment exceeds 25 percent.
4. Two-year public institutions are exempt from the restrictions contained in 3(b)
above for the 2002-2004 biennium.
5. Norfolk State University, Virginia Military Institute, and Virginia State University
are exempt from the restrictions contained in 3(b) above for the 2002-2004
biennium.
6. Each institution shall communicate its tuition and fee charges, as approved by
its board of visitors, to the Secretary of Education, the State Council of Higher
Education, and the Chairmen of the House Appropriations and Senate Finance
Committees by May 15 of each fiscal year. In addition, each institution shall
report to the State Council of Higher Education, in a format prescribed by the
Council, the amount of nongeneral fund revenues derived annually, including the
amounts derived in accordance with paragraph E.1.(f) of this item. The State
Council of Higher Education shall report to the Chairmen of the House
Appropriations and Senate Finance Committees by November 1 of each fiscal
year the results of the nongeneral fund revenue survey. This report shall serve as
the foundation for nongeneral fund appropriation adjustments made by the
Department of Planning and Budget.
7. In accordance with Item 1 .E. of this act and prior to the 2004 General
Assembly Session, the Joint Subcommittee Studying Higher Education Funding
Policies shall recommend a cost-sharing policy that includes a tuition policy as
part of the General Assembly's ongoing efforts to fund higher education pursuant
to the base adequacy guidelines. The Joint Subcommittee shall also address
funding and policy issues related to student financial aid.
7
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
10
June 30, 2003
Chart 1 details planned increases for in-state undergraduate tuition and mandatory E&G
fees by institution in FY04 and analyzes those increases as they relate to the adopted
2003 tuition policy. The data show, excluding tuition increases used to support the
institutions’ share of salary increases and fringe benefit costs, all institutions have
complied with the tuition policy regarding increases in tuition and mandatory E&G fees
for FY04. That is, the tuition and mandatory E&G fee increase does not exceed five
percent of the adjusted annualized FY03 base tuition. The average overall increase is
4.1%. If increases for salary and fringe costs are included, the total average increase in
tuition and mandatory E&G fees will be 8.0% with a range of increases from -5.5% to
16.1%,
Chart 1
2003-04 Full-Time In-State Undergraduate Charges
Annualized Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees' 1 *
A Comparison to the 2003 Tuition Policy
2002-03 2003-04
Tuition and
Mandatory
E&G Fees (3)
(Excl. Sal/Fringe Costs
% Increase
Over
2002-03
Tuition
Related to
Sal/Fringe Costs
% Increase
Over
2002-03
Tuition and
Mandatory
E&G Fees t3)
% Increase
Over
2002-03
$3,528
5.0%
$102
3.0%
$3,630
8.0%
$2,935
3.7%
$37
1.3%
$2,972
5.0%
$4,363
5.1%
$287
6.9%
$4,650
12.0%
$3,482
5.0%
$118
3.6%
$3,600
8.6%
$4,002
4.1%
$188
4.9%
$4,190
9.0%
$3,518
5.0%
$242
7.2%
$3,760
12.2%
$2,728
5.0%
$86
3.3%
$2,814
8.3%
$2,616
4.4%
$14
0.6%
$2,630
5.0%
$2,246
4.9%
$136
6.4%
$2,382
1 1 .3%
$2,932
5.0%
$114
4.1%
$3,046
9.1%
$3,210
1.6%
$144
4.6%
$3,354
6.1%
$1,842
1 3.2%
$48
2.9%
$1,890
16.1%
$2,367
5.0%
$89
3.9%
$2,456
9.0%
$3,753
5.0%
$103
2.9%
$3,856
7.9%
$1,844
3.6%
$44
2.4%
$1,888
6.1%
$1,882
-8.3%
$58
2.8%
$1,940
-5.5%
$1,733
-0.4%
$41
2.3%
$1,774
1.9%
$3,024
4.8%
$117
4.0%
$3,141
8.9%
$1,808
-4.7%
$49
2.6%
$1,857
-2.1%
$2,881
4.1%
$109
3.9%
$2,990
8.0%
Institutions
Annualized
Base
Tuition
Mandatory
E&G
Fees
Tuition and
Mandatory
E&G Fees
George Mason University
$3,360
$0
$3,360
Old Dominion University
$2,814
$16
$2,830
University of Virginia* 4 *
$4,091
$61
$4,152
Virginia Commonwealth University
$3,316
$0
$3,316
Virginia Tech
$3,844
$0
$3,844
College of William and Mary
$3,350
$0
$3,350
Christopher Newport University
$2,558
$40
$2,598
UVA-Wise
$2,505
$0
$2,505
James Madison University
$2,140
$0
$2,140
Longwood University
$2,792
$0
$2,792
Mary Washington College
$2,200
$960
$3,160
Norfolk State University (5)
$1,464
$164
$1,628
Radford University
$2,254
$0
$2,254
Virginia Military Institute
$3,574
$0
$3,574
Virginia State University <6 *
$1,780
$0
$1,780
Richard Bland College
$2,028
$24
$2,052
VA Community College System
$1,650
$90
$1,740
Average 4-Year Institutions
$2,803
$83
$2,886
Average 2-Year Institutions
$1,839
$57
$1,896
Average Ail Institutions
$2,689
$80
$2,769
{1) Tuition and mandatory E&G fees are mandatory charges assessed against students for Eduational and General (E&G program operating purposes. E&G programs include instruction, research,
public service, academic support, student services, institutional support and physical plant.
<J) Calculated as original tuition plus (mid-year increase x 2). Institutions with mid-year increases that were less than a $450 cumulative increase in tuition over 2001 -02 rates, may apply up to $225
per semester, $450 in total, to calculate an adjusted annualized base tuition level.
(3) Excludes technology fees.
<4) The calculated increase for 2003-04 employed by the University of Virginia was based on increasing tuition and all mandatory E&G fees, including the technology fee, by 5 percent. When the
technology fee is excluded from the calculation, the increase Is 5.1 percent.
<5) NSU was the only institution that did not increase 2002-03 charges mid-year.
<B * While VSU did not increase tuition mid-year, they did impose a fee surcharge on all full-time students related to the allocation of utility costs to Auxiliary Enterprises ($250 for in-state students and
$150 for out-of-state students.)
Norfolk State University (NSU) increased in-state undergraduate tuition by 13.2% from
FY03 to FY04, an increase higher than the five percent increase cap set by the tuition
policy guidelines for FY04. However, NSU was the only institution that did not assess a
mid-year tuition increase. The tuition policy allows the institutions to set the 2003-04
tuition over an adjusted FY03 base tuition which combines the original 2002-03 tuition
plus the adjusted annualized mid-year increase. As NSU did not have a mid-year
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
increase, its adjusted FY03 base tuition was lower than the allowable rate and therefore
artificially overstates the increase. In addition, Richard Bland College and the Virginia
Community College System appear to have reduced their tuition and mandatory E&G
fees in FY04 by this calculation. However, this is not the case. Their mid-year
increases were simply less than $450, the amount the tuition policy permits institutions
to use as the adjusted annualized mid-year increase for the FY03 base tuition.
A comparison of actual increases in tuition, mandatory fees, and room and board
charges for full-time in-state undergraduate students between 2002-03 and 2003-04 is
in Appendix D-1 . Increases in tuition and mandatory fees for other types of students are
contained in Appendices of D-2 through D-6.
A Look Back: Tuition Trends in Virginia
Over the last 25 years, the state’s tuition policy has changed significantly. Between the
late 1970s and the late 1980s, tuition was steadily increased at Virginia institutions. In
the early 1990s, the state reduced its funding to higher education due to the economic
recession. As a result, institutions increased tuition by double-digit percentages during
that period. To contain escalating tuition, the Governor and General Assembly
established a cap on how much the institutions’ governing boards could increase in-
state undergraduate tuition and mandatory E&G fees. During the 1994-96 biennium,
institutions could not increase these charges by more than three percent - about the
rate of inflation. In 1996-97, the Governor and General Assembly suspended the
boards’ authority to increase tuition and froze tuition and mandatory E&G fees for in-
state undergraduate students. To make college more affordable, the Governor and
General Assembly rolled back in-state undergraduate tuition and mandatory E&G fees
by 20% in 1999-2000. Following the tuition rollback, tuition and mandatory E&G fees
for in-state undergraduates once again were frozen until 2002-03, the year when the
state funding to higher education was reduced again due to the economic recession.
To offset the general fund reduction, the Governor and General Assembly lifted eight
years of tuition restrictions on in-state undergraduate students. As a result of further
state budget reductions made in October 2002, institutional boards of visitors levied
mid-year increases for the spring semester of 2003 on top of the 2002-03 annual
increases. Concerned with the impact of tuition increases and college affordability, the
Governor and General Assembly established a cap on increases in tuition and
mandatory E&G fees for in-state undergraduate students.
The changes of tuition increases in Virginia are graphically displayed on the following
page. At four-year institutions, the impact of those recent policies is evident in Chart
2A. In constant dollars, in-state, undergraduate tuition and mandatory E&G fees
(charges for instruction and related costs) at four-year institutions have increased by
82% over the last 25 years. At two-year institutions, the same trend is evident in Chart
2B. In constant dollars, average charges at these institutions increased by 91% over
the last 25 years. However, even with the tuition increases in FY03 and FY04, tuition
charges in constant dollars are still less than they were ten years ago at both four-year
and two-year institutions.
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Chart 2A
Full-Time In-State Undergraduate Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees
Four-Year Institution Average
$3,500
$3,000
$2,500
$ 2,000
$1,500
$1,000
$500
$0
$3 ’ 217 $3,112 $3,178
1 1 1 1 1
1978-79 1983-84 1988-89 1993-94 1998-99 2003-04
-♦-2004 Constant Dollars Actual Dollars
Chart 2B
Full-Time In-State Undergraduate Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees
Two-Year Institution Average
$2,500 -
$ 2,000 -
$1,500 -
$ 1,000 -
$500 -
$0
$1 ,966
$1,904
$1,924
“1 1 1 1 »
1978-79 1983-84 1988-89 1993-94 1998-99 2003-04
-2004 Constant Dollars Actual Dollars
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
10
13
June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Sharing the Cost of Education
Looking at the tuition trends in Virginia provides an interesting and useful context in
which to consider the increases for the 2003-04 academic year. However, to assess
the impact of those increases, it is important to consider the role of the state in providing
general fund support for higher education, the proportionate cost students pay, and how
other fees and charges may impact the bottom line for students and their parents.
Prior to the economic recession of the early 1990s, the Commonwealth used a cost-
sharing policy to determine appropriate tuition levels. To establish more equitable tuition
practices among institutions, Virginia introduced a 70/30 policy in 1976. Under this
plan, E&G appropriations were based on the state providing 70% of the cost of
education - a budgetary estimate based on the instruction and related support costs per
student - and students contributing the remaining 30%. (The community college policy
was 80% state/20% students).
The 30% component was comprised of two parts: 1) tuition and fee revenue from in-
state students: and 2) tuition and fee revenue from out-of-state students. In order to
meet the 30% goal, the policy required in-state students at Virginia’s public four-year
institutions to cover approximately 25% of the cost of their education. The remainder of
the 30% revenue came from out-of-state students, who contributed 75% of the cost of
their education.
Due to the recession of early 1990s, the 70/30 policy was discontinued. The
Commonwealth could no longer afford to maintain the same level of general fund
support. As a result, large tuition increases were authorized to offset general fund
budget reductions. In fact, by the end of the recession, in-state students contributed up
to 40% of the cost of education at some institutions. In 1993, the Commonwealth
implemented a state policy requiring institutions to set out-of-state tuition at a level that
would cover at least 100% of the cost of education. This requirement helped further
reduce increasing pressures on the state general fund.
During the 2000 legislative session, the General Assembly and Governor once again
affirmed the policy that in-state undergraduate students should pay a consistent
percentage of the cost of education. They directed institutions to begin phasing in-state,
student tuition charges to 20% of the average cost at the community colleges and 25%
at the public four-year institutions. In the following 2001-02 academic year, upon
implementing the cost share policy, 13 of the 15 four-year institutions met the stated
goal of charging in-state undergraduates no more than 25% of the cost of their
education. The system average cost was 23% for the student’s share. However, due to
the current economic recession, institutions increased tuition twice in 2002-03 in order
to offset state funding reductions made in 2002. Based on institutions’ boards of visitors
approved tuition increases for 2003-04, the average in-state undergraduate student
share of cost at four-year institutions will be 35%. The average in-state undergraduate
student share for the entire system will be 36% of the cost of education in the 2003-04
ERiC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
11
14
June 30, 2003
academic year with only two institutions at 25% or below (Norfolk State University and
Virginia State University).
Chart 3 depicts the average cost shares between the state and in-state undergraduate
student in FY94, FY02 and FY04. The data show that students had the highest share of
cost of education in FY94, while the state had the highest cost share in FY02. Although
tuition rapidly increased in FY03 and FY04, the estimated share of cost for students in
FY04 will still be less than the cost in-state undergraduate students shared in FY94.
Chart 3
Cost Share Relationship between the State and In-State Undergraduate Students
Other Mandatory Charges
While the Commonwealth’s cost-sharing policy is based on instruction-related charges,
students are required to pay other mandatory fees. These charges (often referred to as
mandatory non-E&G fees) support auxiliary activities, such as athletics, student health
services, campus transportation, and debt service. Unlike instruction, these non-
educational activities receive no state tax support and are funded almost entirely by
student revenue. Chart 4 summarizes tuition and total fees planned for in-state
undergraduate students in 2003-04.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
12
15
June 30, 2003
Chart 4
2003-04 Full-Time, In-State, Undergraduate Charges
Tuition and Total Mandatory Fees (1)
Tuition and
% Increase
$ Increase
Total
Over
Over
Institutions
Mandatory Fees
2002-03
2002-03
George Mason University
$5,112
10.9%
$504
Old Dominion University
$4,928
10.9%
$484
University of Virginia
$5,964
19.8%
$984
Virginia Commonwealth University
$4,869
15.4%
$651
Virginia Tech
$5,095
17.5%
$759
College of William and Mary
$6,430
17.2%
$942
Christopher Newport University
$4,600
20.4%
$778
UVA-Wise
$4,496
11.2%
$452
James Madison University
$5,058
13.5%
$600
Longwood University
$5,877
17.9%
$894
Mary Washington College
$4,688
1 1 .9%
$499
Norfolk State University
$3,840
16.5%
$544
Radford University
$4,140
15.2%
$546
Virginia Military Institute
$7,584
11.3%
$767
Virginia State University
$4,350
14.4%
$546
Richard Bland College
$2,080
16.1%
$288
VA Community College System
$1,882
26.5%
$394
Average 4-Year Institutions
$5,136
14.8%
$664
Average 2-Year Institutions
$1,981
20.8%
$341
Average All Institutions
$4,764
15.1%
$625
(1> Includes mandatory E&G fees as well mandatory non-E&G fees which are charges assessed against
students primarily for Auxiliary Enterprise activities such as athletics, student health services, student
unions, recreational facilitiesand programs, campus transportation, and capital debt service.
As with tuition and mandatory E&G fees, the Governor and General Assembly limited
the authority of the institutions’ governing boards to increase mandatory non-E&G fees
at five percent annually in the 2003 Appropriation Act. However, exceptions are
permitted if institutions set fees higher to support state-mandated wage and salary
increases and/or funding for non-educational capital projects approved by the General
Assembly. At four-year institutions, for in-state undergraduate students, mandatory
non-E&G fees will average $1,958 for the 2003-04 academic year -- an increase of
8.5% over 2002-03. At two-year institutions, these fees will average $57 for the
upcoming year, reflecting no change from the 2002-03 levels. Increases in excess of
5% are needed to support institutions’ share of salary increases and health costs,
capital projects authorized by the General Assembly or other areas exempted by the
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 13 June 30, 2003
16 BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Appropriation Act. Appendix C provides a list of all mandatory non-E&G fees by
institution.
The combination of tuition, mandatory E&G fees, and mandatory non-E&G fees
constitute the total basic charges required for any student attending college. The
overall average increase in tuition and all fees for in-state undergraduates will be 15.1%
- with the increase at the four-year institutions averaging 14.8%, and at the two-year
institutions, 20.8%.
Comparison of Tuition & Fee Rates In Other States
Based upon a widely recognized national survey of 2002 total mandatory charges
conducted by Washington State’s Higher Education Coordinating Board, Virginia’s
institutions have become more cost competitive regionally and nationally over the past
ten years (see Chart 5). In 1993-94, by comparison, Virginia’s charges in these
categories ranked as high as 5 th , 2 nd , and 19 th respectively. In 2002-03, Virginia ranked
20 th highest nationally in terms of mandatory charges for in-state undergraduates at
major public universities, 12 th highest among public colleges and state universities and
44™ highest among state community colleges in that year.
Chart 5
Tuition and Fees
Rank Among All States (1)(2)
1989-90
1993-94
2000-01
2002-03
Estimated
2003-04
Major Public Universities
University of Virginia
8th
5th
18th
20th
16th
Public Colleges and State Universities
George Mason University
Old Dominion University
James Madison University
Longwood University
Radford University
2nd
2nd
11th
12th
9th
Public Community Colleges
28th
19th
41st
44th
30th
(n Based on a survey conducted by the Washington State Higher Education Coordinating Board. Although not all public institutions are included in this survey,
the averages and changes over time at the same set of institutions offer consistency, and the large number of institutions included provides a close
approximation to state averages.
<2) Charges for VA institutions reflect actual tuition and fee rates. Charges in other states are estimated by increasing 2002-03 amounts by average category
increases in 2002-03: 9.8% at major public universities, 10% at public colleges and state universities, and 8.3% at community colleges.
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
14
17
June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
The ranking for the category of “major public universities” is based on tuition and total
mandatory fees at the University of Virginia - the Commonwealth’s flagship university.
The ranking for the category of “public colleges and state universities” is based on the
average tuition and fee rates at George Mason University, James Madison University,
Longwood University, Old Dominion University, and Radford University, as compared to
a sampling of similar institutions in other states. Although not all public institutions are
included in this category, the averages and changes over time at the same set of
institutions provide some consistency. The sampling of institutions also closely
approximates the statewide average of tuition and fees.
The 2002-03 Washington State survey showed that between 1998-99 and 2002-03,
mandatory charges rose an average of 26.7% at state flagship institutions, as compared
to a decrease of 5.6% at the University of Virginia. Similarly, in-state tuition and total
mandatory fees at public colleges and state universities rose 27.5% between 1998-99
and 2002-03 as compared to an average increase of 1.3% at George Mason University,
Old Dominion University, James Madison University, Longwood University and Radford
University. Over the same period, mandatory charges at community colleges
nationwide increased 23.6% as compared to a decrease of 9.3% in Virginia.
Despite significant increases in tuition and all fees for 2003-04, the national rankings of
charges at Virginia’s four-year institutions are not likely to change significantly. In 2002-
03, in-state undergraduate tuition and fees at Virginia’s flagship institution ranked 20th
highest nationally. Tuition and fees at other public colleges and universities ranked
12th. Since these rankings were published, institutions in many states, including
Virginia, enacted mid-year tuition increases. Further, average increases for 2003-04
are expected to be in the double digits nationally. If national increases for 2003-04 were
conservatively estimated to be the same as last year, Virginia’s four-year institutions
would move up in the rankings by three to four positions. In fact, the rankings may not
increase at all once the national data are available. Tuition and fees at Virginia’s
community colleges have been among the lowest nationally for several years. Their
rank in 2002-03 was 44th highest. Their rank in the 2003-04 is expected to be higher -
but still below the national average at 30th.
Beyond state comparisons, it is also important to consider how Virginia’s institutions
fare relative to their public peer institutions nationally. Chart 6 compares the tuition and
all fees at Virginia institutions with those at their national public peer institutions. Based
on the tuition information from the U.S. News and World Report 2003 Edition of
“America’s Best Colleges” (the most recent source of national tuition data), for four-year
institutions, seven Virginia institutions charged less in tuition and all fees than their peer
average while eight Virginia institutions charged higher than their peers. The percentage
difference ranged from -17.1% to 28.5%. However, at all institutional levels, the
average charge at Virginia four-year institutions was only 1.7%, or $73, higher than the
peer average in 2002-03. Data for two-year institutions were not provided in this
publication.
o
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
15
10
June 30, 2003
Chart 6
Comparison of Tuition and All Fees at Public Peer Institutions
Institution
# Public
Peers
2002-03
Virginia
Institution 1
Peer
Average 2
Percent
Difference
Virginia Institution’s Rate Below Peer Averai
2e
Christopher Newport University
22
$3,822
$3,879
-1.5%
George Mason University
22
$4,608
$4,616
-0.2%
Mary Washington College
2
$4,189
$5,051
-17.1%
Radford University
24
$3,594
$3,812
-5.7%
University of Virginia
15
$4,980
$4,984
-0.1%
Virginia Commonwealth University
20
$4,218
$4,585
-8.0%
Virginia Tech
22
$4,336
$5,138
-15.6%
Virginia Institution's Rate Above Peer Avera
ge
College of William and Mary
8
$5,448
$5,225
4.3%
James Madison University
19
$4,458
$4,126
8.0%
Longwood University
15
$4,983
$4,668
6.7%
Norfolk State University
24
$3,296
$3,042
8.3%
Old Dominion University
23
$4,444
$4,057
9.5%
University of Virginia at Wise
6
$4,044
$3,881
4.2%
Virginia Military Institute
2
$6,817
$5,305
28.5%
Virginia State University
24
$3,804
$3,570
6.6%
Notes:
(1) Include mid-year surcharges in Spring 2003.
(2) Based on tuition and fee rates reported by U.S.New and World Report in the 2003 Edition of
"America's Best Colleges". Due to report timing, peer average does not include any possible mid-year
tuition and fee increases.
The Bottom Line for Students and Parents
Although the Commonwealth typically has focused its attention on tuition and
mandatory fees, students and parents are equally, if not more, concerned about the
total cost of college. Absent student financial aid, an in-state undergraduate student
living on-campus can expect to pay: tuition and mandatory E&G fees, mandatory non-
E&G fees, and room and board charges at public four-year colleges and universities.
Students and their families are also responsible for other incidental charges such as
books, transportation, and supplies, which for purposes of this report are not included in
the cost figure.
For 2003-04, room and board charges will average $5,707, an increase of 5.2%. For a
student living on-campus, room and board fees will account for about 53% of the total
price of their college education. In total, the sum of tuition, all mandatory fees, room
and board, on average, will be $10,842 next academic year - an increase of $945 or
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
16 ^ g June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
9.5% for in-state undergraduate students at four-year institutions. Chart 7 details the
average charges and percent increases from FY03 to FY04 at four-year and two-year
institutions.
Chart 7
2003-04 Full-Time Undergraduate Resident Student Charges
Institution Type
Charges
j Avg $ Incr
j Avg % Incr
Senior Institution Average
Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees*
$3,139
$509
19.4%
Technology Fee
$39
$0.6
1.5%
Mandatory Non-E&G Fees
$1,958
$154
8.5%
Tuition and Total Mandatory Fees
$5,136
$664
14.8%
Room and Board
$5,707
$282
5.2%
Total
$10,843
$945
9.5%
Community Colleges
Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees*
$1,857
$339
22.3%
Technology Fee
$67
$2
3.5%
Mandatory Non-E&G Fees
$57
$0
0.0%
Total
$1,981
$341
20.8%
* Excludes technology fee.
For students and their parents, the cost of a college education is determined by the total
cost they will have to pay relative to the level of resources available to them. One
commonly cited indicator of college affordability is the relationship of total charges -
tuition, all mandatory fees, room and board, and other ancillary charges - as a
percentage of per capita disposable income. According to the Bureau of Economic
Analysis at the U.S. Department of Commerce, per capita disposable income is the
income that is available to persons for spending and saving. It is calculated as personal
income less the sum of personal income tax payments and personal non-tax payments
(donations, fees, fines, and forfeitures) to government. Between 2002-03 and 2003-04,
per capita disposable income in Virginia is expected to grow by 5.2%, while median total
costs at Virginia’s public four-year institutions will rise by 13.7%. As a result, median
undergraduate charges as a percentage of per capita disposable income will increase
from 33.8% in 2002-03 to 36.6%. Despite this one-year increase, the cost is still slightly
less than the percent of disposable income required a decade ago.
Compared to other states, Virginia’s median in-state undergraduate charges as a
percentage of per capita disposable income have exceeded the national average over
the last decade. However, the Commonwealth’s policy to restrain and reduce in-state
undergraduate tuition between 1994 and 2002 has reduced the gap between the state
and national averages. In 1990, Virginia’s per capita disposable income was about 6%
higher than the national average. In contrast, the median total undergraduate charge
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 17 r June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
(including room and board) for in-state undergraduate students was nearly 30% higher
than the national norm. Nationally, total charges represented 28.2% of per capita
disposable income while the rate was 34.4% in Virginia. By 2003, the relationship
between student charges and income had changed substantially in Virginia. While
Virginia’s income was still approximately 6% higher than the national average, total
student charges were also about 6% higher than they were nationally. As a result,
median charges for in-state undergraduates represented about the same percentage of
income in Virginia (33.8%) as they do nationally (33.7%), as is shown in Chart 8A.
National data for 2003-04 will not be available until late 2003, so the impact of the
recent tuition and fee increases in Virginia relative to the nation is yet to be evaluated.
Chart 8A
Average Public 4-Year Total Undergraduate Charges
As a Percent of Per Capita Disposable Income
Note: Cost includes tuition and mandetory fees, end room and board. Excludes mid-year tuition increases.
The 2003-04 national average is estimated based on the annual increase rate in the prior year.
Source: College Board, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, end SCHEV.
In comparison, Virginia two-year institutions’ average in-state undergraduate charges as
a percentage of per capita disposable income have undergone dramatic changes in the
past 15 years. Cost at two-year institutions as a percentage of per capita disposable
personal income is much lower than that at four-year institutions because two-year
institutions do not provide room and board for students. Room and board costs usually
account for 50%, or more, of the total cost for living on campus. Until the late 1990s
(see Chart 8B), Virginia two-year institutions’ average cost as a percent of disposable
income was higher than the national average. As a result of the tuition rollback in 1999,
the percent of disposable income dropped below the national average. Even with
recent tuition increases in 2002-03, Virginia two-year institutions’ average cost as a
percentage of per capita disposable income is still lower than the national average.
Thus, Virginia two-year institutions remain affordable relative to the nation.
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
June 30, 2003
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Chart 8B
Average Public 2-Year Total Undergraduate Charges
As a Percent of Per Capita Disposable Income
Note: Cost includes luition and mandatory fees. Excludes mid-year tuition increases.
The 2003-04 national average is estimated based on the annual increase rate in the prior year.
Source: College Board, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, and SCHEV.
Access and Affordability
Chart 9
Average Full-Time In-State Undergraduate Tuition and Mandatory E&G Fees
(Excluding Technology Fees)
Note: * Includes mid-year tuition increases.
Source: SCHEV.
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 19 June 30, 2003
22 BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Over much of the last decade, the Commonwealth has not only aspired to make a
college education more affordable for Virginia students but also has achieved progress
toward this goal. However, this affordability was achieved through dramatic shifts in
cost sharing over the period, with varying degrees of equity depending upon when a
student entered the system. Chart 9 compares the average tuition and mandatory E&G
fees from FY96 to FY04 with hypothetical inflation-indexed tuition increases over the
same period for in-state undergraduate students. There is no doubt that the tuition
freeze and rollback actions have made Virginia public higher education more affordable.
Students have benefited from the state tuition restrictions as they paid less than
inflation-indexed tuition during this period. In fact, Chart 9 depicts that tuition this fall will
be less than it would have been had it increased by the rate of inflation between 1995-
96 (the year before the tuition freeze began) and 2003-04). However, the chart also
shows the gap in tuition has narrowed in FY04 as a result of the recent increases.
Given the recent history of state tuition polices, an emerging question is: Will the next
decade be characterized by more gradual tuition increases or will the tuition pendulum
continue to swing unpredictably back and forth?
o
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
20
23
June 30, 2003
Appendix A
2003-04 Full-Time Resident Undergraduate Student Charges
Total
$ Incr
$654
$651
$1,344
$1,624
$773
$1,202
$1,128
$584
$772
$1,127
$659
$1,054
$764
$978
$860
$288
, $395
$945
$341
Tf
1^
co
to
% Incr
6.3%
h-
cd
13.2%
16.3%
9.1%
-P
0 s -
CD
o
11.1%
6.3%
0 s -
in
f-
11.1%
6.9%
s £
0 s
CD
T—
8.5%
8.2%
9.1%
16.1%
26.5%
9.5%
35
co
d
CM
s 5
0 s -
CO
CD
Charge
$10,993
$10,441
$11,555
$11,592
$9,241
$12,224
o
o
CO
to
$9,861
$11,024
$11,285
$10,166
$9,938
$9,800
$12,850
$10,358
$2,080
$1,883
$10,842
$1,981
$9,799
Average
Room and Board
$ Incr
o
m
to
1^
CO
to
o
CO
CO
to
CO
CD
to
Tf
to
o
CO
CM
to
o
in
CO
to
CM
CO
to
CM
to
CO
CO
CM
to
o
CD
to
o
LO
to
co
CM
to
CM
to
Tf
CO
to
<
z
<
z
CM
CO
CM
to
z
CM
co
CM
to
% Incr
2.6%
35
CO
6.9%
16.9%
0.3%
-P
5 s -
I s -
Tf
0 s -
in
in
35
m
CM
0 s
q
co
4.5%
q
co
'-e
0 s -
CD
s S
q
Tf
4.2%
s S
0 s -
in
in
z
<
z
s 5
0 s
CM
in
<
z
35
CM
in
Charge
$5,881
$5,513
$5,591
$6,723
co
Tf
Tf
to
$5,794
$6,700
$5,365
$5,966
$5,408
$5,478
960‘9$
$5,660
$5,266
$6,008
<
z
z
$5,707
<
z
$5,707
Tuition and Total
Mandatory Fees
$ Incr
Tf
o
LO
to
Tf
00
Tf
to
Tf
CO
CD
to
in
co
to
CD
m
i^
to
CM
Tf
CD
to
co
to
CM
in
Tf
to
o
o
CD
to
Tf
CD
co
to
CD
CD
Tf
to
m
to
CO
m
to
r-
CD
r-
to
CD
m
to
co
co
CM
to
in
CD
CO
to
CO
CD
CD
to
Tf
CO
to
in
CM
CD
to
% Incr
10.9%
10.9%
19.8%
15.4%
17.5%
17.2%
20.4%
11.2%
13.5%
17.9%
11.9%
16.5%
35
CM
in
11.3%
14.4%
0 s -
CD
26.5%
s S
0 s -
CO
Tf
20.8%
35
in
Charge
$5,112
$4,928
$5,964
$4,869
$5,095
$6,430
o
o
cq
Tf
to
$4,496
$5,058
$5,877
$4,688
$3,840
$4,140
$7,584
$4,350
$2,080
CO
co
°°
to
$5,135
$1,981
$4,764
Mandatory
Non-E&G
$ Incr
CM
Tf
to
N-
to
o
to
I s -
CO
to
CO
to
CM
CO
to
CM
CO
to
m
f-
to
00
I s -
to
CO
CO
to
o
in
to
CM
00
CM
to
Tf
CD
to
in
co
CM
to
co
co
Tf
to
o
to
o
to
s
to
o
to
CD
CO
to
% Incr
35
o
CO
vp
0 s -
CD
CO
Np
0 s
CO
00
so
0 s
00
iri
Sp
e'-
en
so
6 s
CO
uo
vP
0 s
CM
4.3%
35
q
co
12.8%
4.0%
17.2%
6.0%
6.8%
sP
P s
cq
CM
35
o
o
0.7%
0 s
in
CO
0.1%
8.5%
Charge
$1,440
$1,913
$1 ,269
$1,228
r-
co
CO
to
$2,620
$1,752
$1,815
$2,638
$2,787
$1,298
$1,920
$1,664
$3,692
$2,462
o
o
to
Tf
to
$1,958
m
to
$1,734
Q)
<D
1 1
$ Incr
o
to
o
to
o
to
o
to
o
to
o
to
o
to
CM
to
o
to
CM
to
o
to
o
to
o
to
O
to
o
to
o
to
m
to
o
to
CM
to
to
£ t
O O)
« o
? §
ro ^
% Incr
sP
0 s -
q
d
vp
0 s
o
d
so
0 s
q
d
35
o
d
35
o
d
35
o
d
nP
0 s
o
d
vO
0 s
CO
VO
0 s
O
d
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
35
o
d
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0 s
O
in
35
CD
d
3.5%
35
CM
2 o
0)
h-
| Charge
CM
Tf
to
CO
Tf
to
LO
Tf
to
Tf
to
co
co
to
o
in
to
Tf
CO
to
to
co
CO
to
Tf
Tf
to
CD
CO
to
o
CO
to
o
CM
to
CD
CO
to
o
to
o
Tf
to
m
CD
to
CD
CO
to
I s -
CD
to
CO
Tf
to
o
TO
■O
C tf)
$ Incr
CM
CO
Tf
to
CO
Tf
to
CO
co
co
to
Tf
00
m
to
CO
Tf
r-
to
o
5
to
CD
CD
Tf
to
m
f-
co
to
CM
CM
in
to
CD
r-
in
to
CD
Tf
Tf
to
CM
CD
CM
to
CM
in
Tf
to
CM
CO
m
to
co
o
to
co
co
CM
to
o
CD
CO
to
CD
O
in
to
CD
CO
CO
to
CD
00
Tf
to
re a>
2 £
e «
TO
% Incr
-p
e'-
en
35
CO
35
CO
CM
35
CD
sP
0 s
CM
CM
35
CM
35
o
CM
35
35
co
CM
35
co
CM
35
m
35
CD
35
co
CM
35
CD
35
CD
35
35
co
CM
0 s -
CD
35
CM
CM
sP
0 s
o
CM
C ^
O
*3
h-
Charge
$3,630
$2,972
$4,650
$3,600
$4,190
$3,760
$2,814
$2,630
$2,382
$3,046
$3,354
$1,890
$2,456
$3,856
$1,888
$1,940
$1,774
$3,141
$1 ,857
$2,990
Institutions
George Mason University
Old Dominion University
University of Virginia
Virginia Commonwealth University
Virginia Tech
College of William and Mary
Christopher Newport University
UVA-Wise
James Madison University
Longwood University
Mary Washington College
Norfolk State University
Radford University
Virginia Military Institute
Virginia State University
Richard Bland College
VA Community College System
Average 4-Year Institutions (1)
Average 2-Year Institutions
[Average All Institutions
<D
&
TO
-C
o
o
3
0)
CO
TO
O)
>
>>
CD
O
0)
w
o
jC
(/)
c
o
CO
c
Tf
0)
CO
o
o
CM
o
CO
0)
c
3
-c
o
CL
Q>
q:
0)
Q>
LL
■D
C
nj
c
0
*5
I—
^t
o
1
CO
o
o
CM
>
LU
X
o
<n
24
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Appendix B
2003-04 Technology Fees
Full-Time
Full-Time
General
General
Undergraduate Students
Graduate Students
Institutions
Residents
Nonresidents
Residents
Nonresidents
George Mason University
$42.00
$42.00
$42.00
$42.00
Old Dominion University
$42.60
$108.00
$34.80
$90.24
University of Virginia
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
$45.00
VA Commonwealth University
$41.00
$41.00
$41.00
$41.00
Virginia Tech
$38.00
$38.00
$38.00
$38.00
College of William and Mary
$50.00
$86.00
$54.00
$86.00
Christopher Newport University
$34.00
$34.00
N/A
N/A
UVA-Wise
$50.50
$50.50
N/A
N/A
James Madison University
$38.00
$178.00
$24.00
$192.00
Longwood University
$44.00
$44.00
$44.00
$44.00
Mary Washington College
$36.00
$36.00
$18.00
$18.00
Norfolk State University
$30.00
$30.00
$24.00
$24.00
Radford University
$20.00
$204.00
$68.00
$166.00
Virginia Military Institute
$36.00
$36.00
N/A
N/A
Virginia State University
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
Richard Bland College
$40.00
$40.00
N/A
N/A
VA Community College System (1
$94.50
$94.50
N/A
N/A
Average 4-Year Institutions (2)
$39.08
$69.46
$39.35
$71.48
Average 2-Year Institutions (2)
$67.25
$67.25
N/A
N/A
Average All Institutions (2)
$42.60
$69.19
$39.35
$71.48
(1) Technology fee is $3.15 per credit hour. Amount included here is based on a full-time student taking
30 hours, 15 per semester.
{2) Average at those institutions charging technology fees to full-time students.
O
ERIC
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
22
25
June 30, 2003
Appendix C
Full-Time Undergraduate Mandatory Non-Educational and General Fees (1>
Institution
2002-03
2003-04
Difference
% Increase
Institution
2002-03
2003-04
Difference
% Increase
George Mason University
Virginia Tech
Student Activity
$157.97
$133.37
($24.60)
-15.6%
Student Activity
$226.00
$227.00
$1.00
0.4%
Athletic
$340.35
$343.92
$3.57
1.0%
Health Service
$107.00
$109.00
$2.00
1.1%
Health Service
$51.25
$59.17
$7.92
15.5%
Athletic
$232.00
$232.00
$0.00
0.0%
Debt Service
$292.47
$242.45
($50.02)
-17.1%
Bus
$57.00
$66.00
$9.00
15.0%
Bus
n/a
$2.00
n/a
n/a
Hokie Passport
$9.00
$9.00
$0.00
0.0%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$368.63
$224.71
($143.92)
-39.0%
Recreational Sports
$143.00
$144.00
$1.00
0.7%
Recreation Facilities
n/a
$90.69
n/a
n/a
$054.00
$067.00
$13.00
1.5%
Student Unions
n/a
$34.64
n/a
n/a
Capital Outlay
$10.68
$0.00
($10.60)
-100.0%
College of William and Mary
Aux Central
$43.60
$162.17
$110.57
271.9%
Student Activity
$147.00
$161.00
$14.00
9.5%
Aux Services
$133.05
$146.00
$13.03
10.4%
Athletic
$065.00
$916.00
$51.00
5.9%
$1,390.00
$1,440.00
$42.00
3.0%
Health Service
$301.00
$311.00
$10.00
3.3%
Debt Service
$256.00
$251.00
($5.00)
-2.0%
Old Dominion University
Bus
$46.00
$46.00
$0.00
0.0%
Student Activity
$321.21
$305.30
$64.09
20.0%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$295.00
$313.00
$10.00
6.1%
Athletic
$590.04
$636.14
$46.10
7.6%
General Aux. Services
$200.00
$314.00
$26.00
9.0%
Health Service
$94.00
$96.00
$2.00
2.1%
PC Maintenance
n/a
$16.00
n/a
n/a
Debt Service
$172.10
$103.67
$11.57
6.7%
Telecom/Network
$290.00
$292.00
$2.00
0.7%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$424.07
$410.31
($14.56)
-3.4%
$2,400.00
$2,620.00
$132.00
5.3%
Contingent Fee
$50.03
$0.00
($50.03)
-100.0%
Transportation Fee
$44.00
$44.00
$0.00
0.0%
Christopher Newport University
Student Union
$144.65
$157.50
$12.93
0.9%
Athletic
$066.11
$1,065.11
$199.00
23.0%
$1,641.70
$1,913.00
$71.30
3.9%
Debt Service/Capital Reserve
$144.00
$260.55
$116.55
00.9%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$41.30
$24.24
($17.06)
-41.3%
University of Virginia
Student Union
$220.51
$202.14
($26.37)
-11.5%
Student Activity
$39.00
$39.00
$0.00
0.0%
Student Activity
$160.00
$199.96
$39.00
24.9%
Transit
$96.00
$0.00
($96.00)
-100.0%
$1,440.00
$1,752.00
$312.00
21.7%
Debt Service
$150.00
$150.00
$0.00
0.0%
Athletics
$325.00
$300.00
$63.00
19.4%
UVA-Wise
Bus and Escort
n/a
$106.00
n/a
n/a
Student Activity
$39.33
$42.20
$2.95
7.5%
Recreational Facilities
$110.00
$139.00
$21.00
17.0%
Athletic
$570.55
$629.00
$51.25
0.9%
Student Health
$294.00
$290.00
$4.00
1.4%
Health Service
$37.40
$34.66
($2.74)
-7.3%
;tudent Union Operating
$106.00
$141.00
$35.00
33.0%
Debt Service
$199.92
$145.55
($54.37)
-27.2%
Student Programming
$26.00
$0.00
($26.00)
-100.0%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$504.47
$679.71
$95.24
16.3%
Student Radio, WTJU
$6.00
$0.00
($6.00)
-100.0%
Publications/Yearbook
$42.00
$9.06
($33.74)
-70.0%
$1,160.00
$1,269.00
$101.00
0.6%
Contingent Fee
$95.70
$07.66
($0.04)
-0.4%
Orientation
$9.57
$0.16
($1.41)
-14.7%
VA Commonwealth University
Intramurals
$20.00
$19.25
($1.63)
-7.0%
Student Activity
$45.00
$52.00
$7.00
15.6%
Student Life Enhancement
$67.06
$01.05
$13.99
20.6%
Health Service
$161.00
$164.00
$3.00
1.9%
Discretionary Fund
$4.70
$6.75
$2.05
43.6%
Athletics
$310.00
$324.00
$14.00
4.5%
Highland Players
$1.40
$1.10
($0.30)
-21.4%
snt Union/Rec. Facilities
$460.00
$476.00
$0.00
1.7%
Student Government
$47.05
$39.56
($0.29)
-17.3%
Student Services
$43.00
$61.00
$30.00
00.4%
Outdoor Recreation
$9.57
$0.71
($0.06)
-9.0%
king and Transportation
$101.00
$50.00
($51.00)
-50.5%
Building Contingency
n/a
$20.90
n/a
n/a
Contingencies/ Re serves
$20.00
$61.00
$41.00
205.0%
$1,740.00
$1,015.00
$75.00
4.3%
Facilities Fund
$13.00
$20.00
$7.00
53.0%
$1,161.00
$1,220.00
$67.00
5.0%
,1 * Comprehensive fees have been allocated to appropriate categories based on prior year expenditure budgets.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
23 28
June 30, 2003
Appendix C (Continued)
Full-Time Undergraduate Mandatory Non-Educational and General Fees (1)
Institution
2002-03
2003-04
Difference
% Increase
Institution
2002-03
2003-04
Difference
% Increase
James Madison University
Radford University
Student Activity
$497.00
$504.00
$7.00
1.4%
Student Activity
$104.00
$102.00
($2.00)
-1.9%
Athletics
$801.00
$822.00
$21.00
2.6%
Athletic
$494.00
$514.00
$20.00
4.0%
Student Health
$131.00
$137.00
$6.00
4.6%
Health Service
$161.00
$170.00
$9.00
5.6%
Indirect Costs
$424.00
$474.00
$50.00
11.8%
Debt Service
$80.00
$80.00
$0.00
0.0%
Transportation
$54.00
$55.00
$1.00
1.9%
Bus/Transportation
n/a
$40.00
n/a
n/a
Facilities
$653.00
$646.00
($7.00)
-1.1%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$573.00
$367.00
($206.00)
-36.0%
$2,560.00
$2,638.00
$78.00
3.0%
Student Union
$158.00
$185.00
$27.00
17.1%
Recreation Complex
n/a
$206.00
n/a
n/a
Longwood University
$1,570.00
$1,664.00
$94.00
6.0%
Student Activity
$161.00
$161.00
$0.00
0.0%
Athletics
$783.00
$869.00
$86.00
11.0%
Virginia Military Institute
Health Service
$113.00
$113.00
$0.00
0.0%
Student Activity
$1,121.00
$1,155.00
$34.00
3.0%
Debt Service
$322.00
$428.00
$106.00
32.9%
Athletic
$949.00
$978.00
$29.00
3.1%
Facilities/Building
$9.00
$15.00
$6.00
66.7%
Health Service
$152.00
$156.00
$4.00
2.6%
Auxiliary Services
$477.00
$594.00
$117.00
24.5%
Barber Shop
$93.00
$96.00
$3.00
3.2%
Parking/Transportation
$65.00
$93.00
$28.00
43.1%
Laundry/Pressing
$227.00
$232.00
$5.00
2.2%
Recreation/Intramurals
$44.00
$38.00
($6.00)
-13.6%
Uniforms
$915.00
$1,075.00
$160.00
17.5%
Social/Cultural
$72.00
$73.00
$1.00
1 .4%
$3,457.00
$3,692.00
$235.00
6.8%
Student Services
$143.00
$127.00
($16.00)
-11.2%
Telecommunications
$222.00
$207.00
($15.00)
-6.8%
Virginia State University
Technology Services
$60.00
$69.00
$9.00
15.0%
Student Activity
$318.00
$320.00
$2.00
0.6%
$2,471.00
$2,787.00
$316.00
12.8%
Athletic
$502.00
$528.00
$26.00
5.2%
Health Service
$140.00
$152.00
$12.00
8.6%
Mary Washington College
Debt Service
$300.00
$300.00
$0.00
0.0%
Telecom (Resident)
$228.00
$228.00
$0.00
0.0%
Facilities/Bldgs.
$200.00
$220.00
$20.00
10.0%
Student Activities/Parking
$159.00
$209.00
$50.00
31 .4%
Security
$132.00
$130.00
($2.00)
-1.5%
Athletics
$346.00
$346.00
$0.00
0.0%
Auxiliary Enterprise Surcharge 2
$250.00
$524.00
$274.00
109.6%
Debt Service
$394.00
$394.00
$0.00
0.0%
Rogers Stadium Fee
n/a
$76.00
n/a
n/a
Student Organizations
$121.00
$121.00
$0.00
0.0%
Contingent/Misci Facilities Mgt
$142.00
$170.00
$28.00
19.7%
$1,248.00
$1,298.00
$50.00
4.0%
Radio Station
$40.00
$42.00
$2.00
5.0%
$2,024.00
$2,462.00
$438.00
21.6%
Norfolk State University
Student Activity
$178.00
$196.00
$18.00
10.1%
Richard Bland College
Athletic
$1,045.00
$1,127.00
$82.00
7.8%
Student Activity
$40.00
$44.00
$4.00
10.0%
Health Service
$45.00
$49.00
$4.00
8.9%
Athletic
$8.00
$4.00
($4.00)
-50.0%
Debt Service
$44.00
$47.00
$3.00
6.8%
Administratiori/lndirect Costs
$20.00
$20.00
$0.00
0.0%
Student Center Debt Fee
n/a
$200.00
n/a
n/a
Parking
$32.00
$32.00
$0.00
0.0%
Contingent
$83.00
$64.00
($19.00)
-22.9%
$100.00
$100.00
$0.00
0.0%
Student Center
$63.00
$63.00
$0.00
0.0%
Auxiliary Security Srv
$139.00
$128.00
($11.00)
-7.9%
VA Community College System
Transportation
$41.00
$46.00
$5.00
12.2%
Overhead Recovery
$14.10
$14.10
$0.00
0.0%
$1,638.00
$1,920.00
$282.00
17.2%
(1) Comprehensive fees have been allocated to appropriate categories based on prior year expenditure budgets.
<2) A new fee implemented in Spring 2003. The listed $250 was charged to in-state students. Out-of-state students were charged for $150. Starting in FY04, all students are
charged for $524 on an annual basis.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
24
27
June 30, 2003
2002-04 Full-Time Resident Undergraduate Student Charges
ro
9
<o
o
o
CN
Percent
Increase
s?
co
CD
5?
CO
CD
55
CM
CO
vO
o'
co
CO
2
05
nP
o'
05
d
2
SP
o'
co
d
55
in
r*-’
2
■*—
Sp
05
CO
Sp
o'
05
55
in
00
sj
S'
CM
od
2
05
2
d
55
in
d
CM
55
in
05
55
co
d
CM
55
co
05
2
£
CO
05
CD
O
■TO
■TO
O
in
in
in
CM
05
in
■TO
CN
05
O’
CN
CN
CM
0
0
co
5
co
05'
ro
CM
p
in
co
CN
CO
CO
0 *
00
co
05
05 '
0
0
co
05 '
0
in
co
CM
co
in
co
0
0
00
p
CM*
co
00
p
CN
3
d
co
05
05
05
r-
05"
«-» (1)
C U5
& <o
o 0J
<5 o
Q. £
5?
CD
CN
2
CO
s$
0 s
P
CD
O'*
05
CD
s?
o'
CO
d
55
ro*
55
p
in
55
in
CN
55
p
CO
55
in
ro*
55
O
CO
2
05
55
p
ro*
55
CM
ro*
55
in
in
<
z
<
Z
55
CM
in
<
Z
55
CN
in
itl
2 E l
<D 5 <0
5 2°
< o 0,
«
co
in
CO
in
in
O)
in
in
co
CM
r*-
cd‘
co
*TO
M 1
ro*
05
p
in'
0
0
c*-
co'
in
co
CO
in*
co
co
°l
in"
co
0
ro*
in
CO
D-
ro
in
00
05
0
co"
0
co
S
in
co
CO
CM
in"
00
0
0
co"
<
z
<
z
h»
0
r*»
in"
<
z
f-
0
p
in
+* 0)
c w
o ro
o ro
ro o
£L £
S?
O
co
Vp
5 s
CD
CO
55
co
od
55
co
in
55
in
55
CO
in
55
D-
CN
55
CO
■ro
55
p
CO
5?
co
CM
55
p
■TO
55
CM
5?
0
to
5?
00
d
5?
< p
CM
55
p
d
55
p
d
55
in
co
55
0
d
55
in
co
o °
2 °6 </>
n ill «
■O 7 o
c £ U-
£ 3
o
ro*
co
05
05
CO
CN
CO
CN
CM
r-
<0
co
0
CN
p
CN
CN
in
r**-
n
s
co
co
CD
CM
D-
CO
f*^
CM
co
05
CM_
0
CM
o>_
3
p
CM
O)
p
co"
CN
CO
ro*
CN
0
0
ro*
00
in
o>
r-
in
ro*
co
p
<D
C (/)
ro ro
e e
ro o
0- £
ro;
ro
s§
05
in
55
CM
CO
CN
2
05
55
CN
55
O
CN
5?
co
05
55
co
CO
55
in
CM
55
O
CO
CN
nP
o'
CO
in
55
CO
in
nP
o'
CO
CM
CM
55
00
in
2
d
S'
O
D-i
o'
p
d
CN
o'
05
nP
o'
p
CN
S?
CO
05
2 s 8
.2 ■o T3 u.
3 5 C U
h ro
2 ID
CN
f»-
CD
co
in
o
co'
in
05
CO_
M 1
3
co'
CO
CN
CM
■TO*
O
00
co'
CO
s
CN*
5
CO
CN
O
CM
ro_
CN
O
05
O
co"
0
05
CO
co'
0
CM
o>
CO
I*-.
ro*
CN
CM
05
p
CO*
co
00
p
O
00
O)
CO
CO
p
CO
h-
CO*
ro*
CN
05
O
CO
O
CO*
co
9
CM
O
O
CM
"ro
3
CD
CO
co
o
o
05
h-
05
CM
o'
CO
CO
05
05"
co
co
■TO
co'
CN
CM
O
CN
r*-
d
l*--
r*-
CN
05
CN
in
CN
d
05
in
o'
r*-
0
in
05 "
5
00
co*
CO
CO
0
05 '
CM
I s —
00
00
05
ro*
05*
CN
05
D-
CO
00
ro -
r*~
05
00
05*
O
ro*
P
CO
CN
05
00*
• ?
f e I
1 1 a
^ o:
co
r-
in
CO
■TO
CO
in
CO
CN
in
O
in
d-
in'
CM
CO
■TO*
3
in
in
0
in
CO
co'
co
CO
CN
in
3
r-
in*
CO
h-
in
co
co
in
§
in
id
CN
ro*
ro*
in
in
in
0
in"
3
CO
in
<
z
<
z
in
CN
ro*
in"
<
z
in
CN
ro*
in"
£• o
1 2 3
X3 7 0)
C £ LL
2 2
oo
CD
CO
CM
s
co
co
5
s
co
00
co
ro
CN
0
ro*
ro*_
0
ro
r-
0
co
in
CN
ro
CN
co
s
00
co
co
0
N-
p
r^
in
ro*
co"
ro*
CM
O
CM*
0
0
ro*
ro*
0
p
r^
in
00
05
in
i ? n
£ c -o u.
3 ™ C
>- s 8
* ID
o
CM
co
CM
O
CD
<N
CM
co
co'
D-
in
0
co'
CM
co
■TO
co'
0
0
0
co"
CM
CO
CO
CN
ro
0
co_
CN
co
05
°o
CM
in
CN
5
CN
00
in
cq
ro*
CM
0
cm"
0
co
co
co"
O
00
r*-_
CM
05
p
ro*
ro*_
co
co
CO
cm"
co
00
in
0
3
CN
tf)
C
o
3
Vi
c
3
2
0
3
Q
O
<
>
3
3
O
>
5
£
3
Z
O
05
CO
$
<
>
3
3
2
— >
3
_i
O
5
2
3
cn
z
3
DC
2
>
%
CO
>
O
CQ
DC
W
O
O
>
(/)
to
c
0
‘c
<15
cn
05
>
in
to
_c
>
CM
05
>
<
B
to
c
§
05
>
<
E *
CO
o
o
CM
o'
CO
CD
c
3
in
CM
o
06
LU
» ^ £
>OD5
D) £ .o
■c
o
Q.
CD
a:
CD
<D
LL
T3
C
as
c
o
3
W
>
E J*
p> -
£ O
"3-
O
i
CO
o
o
CM
>
LU
X
o
if)
28
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
2002-04 Full-Time Nonresident Undergraduate Student Charges
n
9
co
o
o
CM
Percent
Increase
s
cd
S
■d
5?
in
00
5?
CO
■d
vO
S'
o
CD
s
o'
O’
cd
as
o
d
•a—
S'
d
•a—
as
CM
iv!
as
CO
jv!
s?
O'
o
CM
'S
o'
05
CO
-vO
o'
q
as
CO
ev!
as
CD
cd
as
in
r-i
as
i'-.
co
'S
o'
05
o
as
CO
3
co
co
co
o
CM
05
LO
05*
in
r-
io
r-T
CM
CD
CO
05
CO*
CM
m
e--
05*
o
5
r*-‘
CM
o
o
o
05
00
O’
r-
oo*
CO
M-
CM
05"
CO
CO
CM_
r-.'
o
£
00
in
CO
05
CM
CO
oo
CD*
CM
8
in*
CM
co
CO
CM
h-*
CM
h-
M"
CO*
co
o
co
CD*
O'
CO
o
CM
05
CO
CO
1"-*
CO
in
o
05*
d)
C (/)
(U CO
o ©
a u
0. c
-a
5 s
CD
C\i
S
CO
-o
3 s
05
CD
-o
0 s
05
CO
5?
CO
d
a?
r^.
■d
a?
in
in
a?
in
csi
S'
o
cd
as
in
■d
'S
3 s
o
cd
as
05
sg
O'
o
•d
as
CM
as
in
in
<
Z
<
Z
as
CM
in
<
z
">9
o'
CM
in
■O ^
d> c ***
S> w ~
g p
d> £ co
> S o
< o B
5
CO
in
CO
in
in
05
in
in*
CO
CM
l'-
CO*
CD
O'
05
l'-
in
o
o
l'-
CO*
in
CD
CO
in
CD
CD
05
in
co
o
M-
in
co
f-.
M"
in
CO
05
o
CO*
o
CD
CO
in
CD
CO
CM
in*
co
o
o
CD*
<
z
<
z
o
h-
in
<
Z
r-.
o
h-
in
d)
C V)
d> CO
O dJ
dJ o
a. c
o'
O
cd
•'S
o'
05
cd
as
CD
oo
aS
oo
in
3?
in
3?
co
in
s?
r--
CM
as
co
-d
o'
q
cd
-o
o'
cq
CM
'O
o'
o;
■d
o'
CM
h-
as
o
cd
as
cq
CD
as
q
cd
CM
as
o
o
as
o
o
•vO
o'
O
05
as
o
d
'p
o'
q
cd
£ °
; 2 s
T3 ■ d)
c = u_
i i
o
tt
co
05
05
CD
CM
oo
CM
CM
h-
CD
oo
o
CM
CO
CM*
CM
m
N-_
in
5
oo
co
CO
CM*
r--
oo
h-
CM*
^r
05
O
CM
o>
M"
CD
co_
CM
05
CD
CO*
CM
CD
rf
CM*
o
o
rr
3
q
r-
in
oo
CM
h-
*- o
C V)
d) co
O 2
<5 o
Q. C
o
00
-a
S'
CO
•d
v°
S'
05
00
o
■d
as
00
CO
r".
as
q
as
CM
as
c-
as
o
o
as
h-
CM
sP
o'
ID
CM
o'
't
05
as
cq
cd
as
°9
cd
as
in
r-i
a?
CM
o
o'
o
-9
o'
q
d
C/5
= Is
S (S i
3 w c
h co ofl
2 UJ
CM
in
CO*
in
CD
CM*
in
d
CM
in
00
05
in*
CM
CD
■o-
CD
05
m
co*
oo
M-
m
o*
oo
CD
in
CM
■O’
CO
o
O"
o
05*
co
co
O
^r
CO
00
CO
m
05*
^r
o
CD
CD*
oo
05
N.
OO*
CM
e'-
en
oo*
CM
05
CM_
CD*
h-
in
q
CM*
CM
CO
CO
h-'
in
05
CM
CM*
2002-03 [
s
.2
CD
CO
(O
05
o
CM
00
oo*
CM
in*
CM
oo
CO
05
o*
CM
3
o
oo*
co
CM
CM
m*
CM
3
e'-
en*
co
o
r-.’
CD
CO
■o-
h-*
uo
oo
o
CO*
05
in
CD*
05
CM
h-‘
3
TT
in*
CM
05
CD
CO*
CM
CM
05
O
CD*
o
CD
h-‘
CD
CD
00
in*
CO
h-
05
oo*
CO
CO
CD
CO*
M-
CM
n
r-.*
© ?
O) ro P
2 c CO
0 = 0
$ O “
^ OH
CO
f-.
in
CD
CO
in*
CO
CM
in*
a
c-
in*
CM
CO
3
in
in*
o
in
co
CD*
co
co
CM
in*
O'
05
l'-
in*
CD
J'-
in*
CO
CO
in'
OO
oo
in
in’
CM
O"
M-
in
in
in
o
in*
M-
05
CD
in
<
z
<
z
in
CM
in*
<
Z
in
CM
-M-
in
£ »
a u S
? £ £
S *
oo
05
CO
CM
s
oo
CD
CD
3
00
00
00
CM*
o
M;
o
m-
o
CD
in
CM*
h-
o-
CM*
O’
oo
co
CD
o
h-
in
r-
in
co*
O’
CM
q
o
o
M-
o
05
r-_
r-
in
co
00
in
o 2 ©
.2 *0 co d>
c *o U-
^ 5 a
E 2
o
in
CM*
CM
CO
CO
CM
CM
o
05
r--
CM
o
d
oo
05
O
CO*
3
CM
r-'
O’
CD
05
CO*
O’
CD
O
o
CM
00
o
05*
oo
CO
M-
00*
05
CM
d
in
CD
o
o
CM
h-
O'
CO*
o
oo
in*
O’
r-
o-
CO*
o
CD
CO
r-'
CM
in
oo
in
h-
m
r--_
CD
o
CD
CD*
3
Institutions
3
2
O
3
Q
O
5
3
3
O
>
&
2
oC
$
3
Z
O
05
C/5
5
2
3
3
2
—j
3
O
$
2
3
W
z
3
ct
2
>
'b
w
>
O
CQ
Ct
00
O
O
>
«
w
c
o
”c
d>
CO
<
W5
V5
_c
>
CM
05
>
<
CO
CO
c
<
JO > co
£ M
£
2. £ £
§ ^ o
O
oS
LU
05 £ O
3
w
>
= 0=0
CO
o
o
eg
o'
CO
o
c
3
CO
eg
tr
o
Q.
0
a:
0
0
LL
■o
C
ro
c
o
3
O
i
CO
o
o
eg
>
LU
X
o
CO
29
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
o
ERIC
co
Q
x
TD
C
0
Cl
Cl
<
(/>
0
U)
L.
0
o
+■*
c
o
■o
3
+■*
CO
0
+■»
0
3
■D
0
o
■*-*
c
0
■o
'</)
0
a:
CM
o
CO
o
©
CM
Percent
Increase
CM
CO
5.8%
29.9%
''S
o'*
CM
lo
T—
''S
o'
LO
sP
O'"
CM
LO
T—
23.2%
18.7%
10.7%
o'*
O
CO
13.9%
12.8%
15.8%
Total
5,880
5,798
9987
7,030
6,944
7,532
4,824
7,583
3,816
6,024
5,162
5,346
6,150
Percent
Increase
O'-
O
CO
O'
CO
CO
8.6%
5.9%
1.5%
5.3%
nP
o'
CO
CO
12.8%
6.8%
17.2%
6.0%
21.6%
9.2%
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
1,440
1,558
1,269
1,212
Z98
2,620
00
CD
2,787
658
1,920
1,664
2,462
1,592
Percent
Increase
16.9%
6.5%
35.0%
v©
o'
CO
r^'
17.4%
21.3%
26.9%
22.5%
11.6%
11.1%
''S
o'
O
00
6.2%
18.2%
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees
4,440
4,240
6,587
5,818
6,077
4,912
4,176
4,796
3,158
4,104
3,498
2,884
4,557
Total
CO
CD
in
CM
00
’'t
in
CD
c>
CO”
o
co”
CO
o
co”
00
CO
LO
co”
LO
CD
co”
h-
oo
CO
co”
h-
co”
CO
CO
CO
lo”
CO
LO
o
CO
CO
lo”
CO
9
CM
o
o
CM
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
00
CD
CO
1,501
00
CO
1,145
LO
00
2,488
624
2,471
CO
CO
00
CO
CO
1,570
2,024
1,458
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees (1)
3,798
3,981
4,878
4,959
5,177
4,050
3,291
3,916
2,831
3,695
2,964
2,716
3,855
Institutions
3
2
O
I ODU
2
3
| VCU
$
| W&M
| JMU
3
O
2
3
if)
Z
3
a:
CN
3
CO
>
1 Average
■g
TO
w
c
o
CO
_c
0
'c
E>
>
0
</>
0
0
</>
0
0
i—
O
_c
c
o
0
0
CO
o
o
CM
cn
c
'k_
CL
CO
T3
0
0
W
c
0
</)
0
0
k_
0
c
0
0
Vt—
O
oej
LU
1
c
o
c
o
0
■D
c
0
E
l—
0
s.
■g
E
0
T3
0
-C
3
CO
>
co”
o
o
CM
CD
c
CL
CO
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 27 June 30, 2003
Q
x
TD
C
0
Q.
Q.
<
(/>
0
O)
k_
0
O
+■»
c
0
■D
CD
0
*-*
0
3
"D
0
j—
o
+■»
c
0
"D
'</>
0
L.
c
o
z
0
E
o
I
CM
o
o
C\l
O
ERIC
c
0
o
k_
0
Q.
c
0
o
l_
0
CL
0 °
13 UJ
? g
1 5
0
c
0
0
0
o
0
k_
l.
0
O
CL
c
S'
o
£ *o
c
0
S
0
O °
13 uj
? g
o
•o 0
c -q
c
0
£
0
so
0 s
v°
0 s
v°
0 s
vP
O''
sP
o'
o'
'S
o'
so
o'
sP
o'
sP
o'
Np
O'
sO
o'
sp
o'
LD
o
CO
CO
p
O
o
CO
CD
O
CM
r-
CO
LO
O’
h-‘
o
CO
CM
CM
CO
CD
CM
o
s
h-
CO
CO
o
CO
CO
O
O
CM
lO
O’
CD
CO
CD
CM
*“
CO
CM
CO
CO
O)
CD
CD
p
p
p
p
CD
LO
p
tF
tF
CD*
h-‘
o
CD*
'O-
co"
co"
CO*
CD*
cm’
(T
s°
0 s
0 s
sO
o'
s°
o'
v°
o'
s°
o'
S°
o'
sO
o'
sp
o'
sp
o'
sO
o'
sO
o'
O
CO
p
p
p
CO
CO
CO
p
CM
O
o
CO
CO
CO
CO
LO
LO
CO
CM
CO
I s -*
CO
CO
CD
CM
o
CO
CD
CM
h-
O
CO
r-
CO
O
3
CM
CM
O’
LO
to
CO
CM
s
00
LO
CM
CO
CD
p
LO
CM
CM
00
CO
CO
o>
p
p
CM*
cm"
cm"
sO
0 s
sP
o'
sO
O'
>P
o'
vP
o'
sP
o'
so
o'
so
o'
sO
o'
vP
o'
sp
o'
sp
o'
sp
o'
O
p
O
p
p
p
r'-
CO
p
CO
p
p
CM
00
CD
O’
N-
CD
CO
CM
CO
CO
CD
T“
CM
CM
LO
LO
CO
to
CM
CD
o
O
to
O
CD
T —
CO
O)
00
CD
h-
CM
00
o
CO
00
CO
in
CO
p
CD
p
p
CO
o
p
CO
r^
co"
co"
co*
LO*
CD
CO*
CO*
o'
CO*
LO*
rC
CD*
CM*
CO
O’
CO
CM
to
CM
LO
CO
CO
CO
CD
o
h-
CO
h-
to
T~
CD
CO
CD
o
CO
CD
CD
T—
▼-
CM
p
▼“
p
p
LO
CM
CO
O’
CD*
LO*
CD*
00*
CM*
CM*
co"
co"
'r-*
co"
CO
CO
LO
s
00
Tt
T -
CO
CO
o
0
CD
o
CO
O’
CO
CM
h-
T-
CO
CM
LO
p
LO
p
CO
p
CO
p
co
p
p
P
p
CM*
CM*
o
CO
CO
h-
CM
o-
h-
LO
3
O
T—
I'-
to
CM
T—
CO
00
CM
s
LO
N-
LO
LO
CD
00
p
CD
CO
P
cm"
cm"
N-"
Tf"
co*
LO
■*— "
CD*
h-
co"
CO*
CD*
I—' -
0
3
3
<
3
3
o
3
S
CD
0
Q
>
o
t
o 6
3
CO
3
01
"3
e>
O
3
>
5
“3
— J
z
CO
>
0
>
<
CO
O
O
CM
cn
c
‘i_
Q.
co
■D
T3
0
C
o
0
c
0
c
O)
>
I—
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i_
O
c
c
o
0
£
*
■g
E
■o
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
i_
O
c
0
0
0
ofl
LU
1
c
o
c
0
0
T3
C
0
E
ft—
CO
SL
1
*u
E
0
■D
0
0 ->
0
>» CO
s 8
F <N
0
0
■o
-E
o
c
cn
c
Q_
CO
31
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 28 June 30, 2003
2002-04 Resident First Professional Student Charges
| 2003-04 1
Percent
Increase
10.2%
13.3%
20.4%
50.2%
10.7%
37.7%
10.9%
14.4%
NP
O''
a>
c\i
nP
o'-
°o
CN
CO
Total
10,262
23,798
22,486
20,023
20,816
15,851
1 1 ,746
13,159
15,740
lO
i o
CM
CM
Percent
Increase
2.7%
8.4%
7.9%
5.6%
5.4%
5.6%
vO
0 s
iq
11.1%
Np
o'
CO
CO
Np
o'
cq
CO
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
1,431
1,303
1,375
1,262
1,297
1,262
CO
CO
3,185
1,973
1,319
Percent
Increase
11.5%
13.6%
21 .4%
54.6%
11.0%
41 .4%
11.7%
15.5%
13.6%
35.0%
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees
CO
CO
00
22,495
21,111
18,761
19,519
14,589
10,879
9,974
| 13,767
1 19,936
| 2002-03 |
Total
9,315
21,012
18,669
13,331
18,809
11,513
10,594
11,500
13,942
16,000
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
1,393
1,202
1,274
1,195
1,230
1,195
854
2,868
1,821
1,235
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees (1)
7,922
19,810
17,395
12,136
17,579
10,318
9,740
8,632
12,121
CO
CO
r-
Institutions
GMU
Law
CM O
CD .E
—I o
td
©
Z)
co ^ in
o .2 E
TD C m
© ©
3 ^ Q QL
O >
> o
CD
E
CD
.C
CL
VT
Vet Medicine
W&M
Law
| Average Law
jAverage Medicine
« E
03
0)
©
>
Q)
W <D
c -o
.y to
TD >
0) (o
_co
C
0)
TO
D
CO
sz
CL
t_
(0
0)
CO
o
o
CM
03
C
•C
CL
C/)
0)
*o
o
03
</) </) 0) </)
m m "O
o
o$
co LU
to r*
CO O
CO o
0)
>, 0)
^ ©
to
£ CD
oS
O
*—
S' £
CO
o
§ -o
LU
r
CO
TD
_ c
CO CO
CD
©
E
E
00
E
>,
TD
TD
©
TD
i
C
C
©
C
"D
CD
CD
M—
CD
E
C
C
TD
C
to
o
o
C
CD
o
©
TD
’5
’5
C
o
'5
Z3
©
©
©
O
.c
.c
‘5
.c
c
h-
h-
h-
h-
c.
Ci
«
j,
32
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 29 June 30, 2003
2002-04 Nonresident First Professional Student Charges
2003-04 I
Percent
Increase
5.1%
6.8%
11.6%
13.4%
11.2%
14.2%
vO
o'
CN
CO
VO
0 s
cr>
sP
o'
CD
CD
sP
o'
ID
CN
Total
20,412
29,201
34,536
35,891
37,628
24,161
27,916
23,399
24,337
35,214
Percent
l Increase
2.7%
8.4%
7.9%
5.6%
5.4%
5.6%
1.5%
ii.i%
8.3%
O'
00
CD
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
1,431
CO lO
o r-
co CO
1,262
1,297
1,262
867
3,185
1,973
1,319
Percent
Increase
5.3%
6.7%
11.7%
13.7%
11.5%
14.7%
•sp
o'
N;
CO
7.4%
6.5%
12.7%
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees
18,981
27,898
33,161
34,629
36,331
22,899
O)
<o
CN
CN
O
CN
1 22,364
| 33,895
2002-03 |
Total
19,424
27,352
30,952
31 ,656
33,828
21,157
25,812
21,690
22,822
31,304
Mandatory
Non-E&G
Fees
1,393
1,202
1,274
1,195
1,230
1,195
854
CO
CD
CO
CN
CN
CD
lO
CO
CN
7 —
Tuition
and
Mandatory
E&G Fees (1)
18,031
26,150
29,678
30,461
32,598
19,962
24,958
18,822
21,001
| 30,070
Institutions
GMU
Law
UVA
Law
Medicine
n 't m
~£>~o
o .2 E
T3 C m
Q> 0 ) Jr
S Q £
3 i
> 1
CO
JZ
CL
CO
~0
C
j o
TD
CD
£2
W&M
Law
| Average Law
|Average Medicine
CD
>
03
, .
vj
w
C
03
c
0
c
CD
"O
3
*o
3
"O
to
to
c
3
>v
0
to
-Q
o
*D
ft
&
ro
o
ns
E
"O
<D
>
(0
v_
03
r~
ro
E
CD
03
Q.
i_
i—
i_
03
03
LL
ns
CD
>
£
CO
0
>v
E
£
d
CD
E
l£=
ifT
T3
l£=
k_
3
l—
o
o
O
Vt—
Vt—
CO
Vt—
E
E
3
E
CO
as
ns
c
ns
o
CO
CO
0
CO
o
CN
ro
ro
no
ro
O)
c
o
o
as
0
o
•c
0
<D
>
0
Q.
CO
3
£
to
vE
O
O
k_
O
o0
k_
00
V)
0
if}
LU
LU
£
0
LU
ro
0
L_
o
o
CO
o
ro
ro
ro
o
*o
*o
Id
X)
c
c
c
c
■
ns
ns
to
03
%■
E
E
CO
E
*o
*o
0
*o
c
c
0
c
*6
ns
03
vt—
ns
E
c
c
*o
c
w
o
o
ns
o
0)
*o
3
3
*3
c
o
*3
0 3
<D
0
73
JZ
JZ
3
JZ
c
\-
\-
1-
\-
—
s
co
• — ■
s
x.
• — •
co
o
o
CN
o'
CO
0)
c
3
o
CO
o
CL
d>
O'
d>
d)
LL
TJ
C
as
c
o
o
I
CO
o
o
CN
>
LU
X
o
CO
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
33
Tuition and Fees in Selected States
</>
CD
</>
Urn
<D
>
T3
0) ^
13 9
c CO
.E o
«-» o
0 CM
LU
CO
0
"O 0)
C LL
c y
o 3
v 0
3 T5
lZ c
^ 03
CO
T3
0) ®
03 C
w £
innNoi^T-smsMion’tNn't't
NONT-N(0T-0)lflNN0)<0S(0«n
CO CM_ 0)_ CJ O CO T- C0_ h- Tt CM_ T- o>_ ■'t CO CJ 00_
of of co co co" js." is." to «f <o" <o" <o in" iff Tt Tt cf
IA t A f A f A t A * #n £ #n « A • A • A • A • A • #n * t A • A fA
V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 VT V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 vT V7 V7
c
o
E
k.
CD
>
0)
k.
03 in
c ^
S £
> E c
>* w 5
w x .5
i 5 o
il Z S
>*
a>
</)
k.
CD
"0
5
CD
z
CO
0 )
CO
3
-C
o
03
CO
CO
0
03 o W
T>
C
03
0
C
o
CO
CD
c
c
0
JO "O
0 03 >
"U >
o
0 <p
0 .2
0
0 O
5 5 S O OH 2 Q
c _c
’O) 3
.2 O
> (0
o
3
*-»
C
0
*
0
c
0
O a
_C T3
si
Z LL.
MWTtlOCONWO)
CM CO 03 O 00 O
r r r CO CO Tf
o
13
D
0.
JL.
o
"(o'
CO
o
CM
o
o
CM
0
0
T3 0
C Li.
= y
o 5
0
= c
^ 0
0
•D
0 *
jc
0 C
55 £
Tj-CMOlDCOTtCMOTj-Tj-OOTj-mTl-CDT-
OCOCOOOOOCOCOlOlOh-TtCOOr^lOCO
o> co t- tt co h- tt cm_ t- co co co ai in ai co in
co" co" co" N-" N-" co" co" co" co" m" in" in" Tt Tt co" 00 cm"
t A t A ^ « f\ * ft f A f A f A / A t A * I A * Q £ ^ * f\ • #n
V7 vT V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V/ - V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7 V7
c
o
E
k.
0
>
0
c
0
>
0
c
c
0
a.
0
k.
0
0
!E
0
Q.
>
0
0
0
3
0
3
o
T 3
C
0
c
o
k.
E
c
0
-C
o
3
jn
T 3
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
O
w
(/)
O
C
0
o
1
2
cp
!E
o
"0
*
0
0
0
0
c
c
0
c
c
0
T 3
O
0
$
0
£
3
0
0
0
o
x:
0
0
o
z
i
Z
ss
5
i
o
or
S
Q
CO
CO
Tt
in
CO
00
03
o
T—
T—
CM
T™
CO
T™
0
o
0
*
0
c
o
k.
0
o co
JZ 5
o o
Z LL.
O O CO 03
CM CO CO tJ-
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 31 June 30, 2003
Tuition and Fees in Selected States
CO
IT)
CM
IO
T-
CO
o
h-
CO
CM
©
Tj-
Tj-
©
©
©
CO
O)
T-
CO
T-
(O
CO
(O
CM
T-
T-
h-
CO
CM
©
T-
©
in
©^
©
©^
CO
©^
©^
©^
©
h-
°°L
©_
©
CO
(0
K
(O'
(O'
(o'
©"
in
©"
in
in
in
CO
CO
CM
cm"
T5
0)
0)
u.
co
co
co
CO
CO
co
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
w
c
0
c
o
o
(0
3
1-
"O
c
<0
s
"C
0) ^
n 9
</>
C CO
.E o
*-» o
<D
.V? N
a^m
UJ
ama
(/)
L.
0)
>
(0
0
+4
"D
0)
>
0
0
u.
!E
(o
a.
0
"E
0
+-»
3
a
0
c
o
u.
'E
0
_c
o
0
c
(0
E
>
4J
“O
c
0
Q.
>
0
C
D
CO
(0
a:
L.
0
"0
£
0
X
S
o
>>
in
c
c
c
o
E
L.
c
0
fc*
0
u>
!E
o
(0
o
c
0
‘E
©
o
0
C
c
0
c
0
o
-C
♦-»
3
(0
E
‘35
in
o
3
c
O
-C
t
0
'o>
u.
o
<D
0
0
!E
0
0
ra
k_
o
"D
O
0
o
0
2
5>
z
z
O CL
>
2
i
=
>
o
c
©
i
z
O
T-
CM
CO
IO
CO
h-
CO
©
©
T"
T-
CM
T“
CM
©
h-
©
00
©
■o
C
(0
V)
co
lO
o
CM
Tf
CO
T"
CO
©
00
©
©
T"
©
h-
©
CO
O)
CM
CO
h-
Tf
©
o
IO
©
Tf
©
©
©
1^
©
o
m
IT)
cn
°l
IO
CO
T-
00
CO
©
CO
T-
©
CM
©
©
in
(O'
©
IO
©
in'
©"
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
Tf
©"
cm"
cm"
0
CO
co
CO
CO
co
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
CO
o
"O
c
a >
u.
o
0
c
o
o
o
Jh
0
o
aaaa
'3
1-
"D
c
0
s
JQ
3
CO
Q.
o
■
CM
o
o
CM
0
0
u.
0
(0
0
"D
0)
>*
0
!E
a)
a.
0
c
0
+-»
3
o
c
o
u.
E
c
o
0
C
tn
E
>
"D
c
0
Q-
0
CO
(0
a:
0
0
>
in
c
o
c
0
0
D)
in
o
0
0
c
o
£
0
'E
.E
o
3
o
0
'©
£
£
o
c
c
E
&_
!E
o
o
c
c
c
0
3
©
to
to
c
■c
L.
o
0
0
!E
0
0
0
o
“O
o
u.
0
o
0
O Q.
> s
i
—
o
_c
©
>
S
o
T—
CM
CO
IO
CO
00
©
o
T~
T-
CM
T“
tT
CM
©
h-
©
©
©
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 32 June 30, 2003
Tuition and Fees in Selected States
</>
a>
o>
a>
o
O
c
3
E
E
o
o
o
n
3
CL
"D
a)
13 9
c CO
.E o
o
iS3 "
CO
o
CM
o
o
CM
in
o
"D a)
c LL
c *
i s
03
= 1
^ 03
(/)
"D
0) «
4-« -*■
03 C
55 2
in
o
"D a)
C Li.
c *
i 5
03
= ?
^ 03
h-
h-
CM
CM
CO
oo
CM
CM
h-
CO
h-
CO
h-
CO
CM
h-
o
00
o
o
o>
o>
o>
h-
CO
co
00
o
CO
00
h-
in
CO
oo
h-
h-
in
00
h-
CO
in
co"
co"
co"
co"
co"
co"
cm"
cm"
cm"
cm"
^-T
CO
</>
</>
c*
c/>
</>
c/*
</>
c/>
</>
</>
</>
</>
</>
</>
</>
0)
CO
Q.
E -
03 C
X o
? E
a) a>
Z >
03
O
</> 03
0) C
(0
4-4
4-4
a>
.5 = .*
(/) £ L
C o O
O <0 >-
V /ft r
"D
C
03
03
C
>% “5
(DC .
<0 03 >
<u ° .5 wo
c 5
0 )COS>- ^ £ C -d D .2
C~ « « i 5 ^ s = '5)'= C s
.zT3j-njQ)5n30 o w O © .52
S=$SzJ2Szw>lE^S
a.! A m AI
03
C
a o
£ c5
a) O
.52 r-
0)
</)
r
o
cm co m m cd h-
CO O) ®
cm o Tt cn cm in
co CO CO Tf Tt
OCMOh-CM-i-LOOTj-TtCOlOlOlOTj-lO
CMr^lOO(OlON 0 CM^SfOO)OO)
Tt co o o> o> co oo coininco in in w co o
Tt oo co cm" cm" cm" cm" cm" cm" cm" cm" v-" t-" t-~
S M A £ A £ A J A J A J /V J rv M -TV |/V ^ | /V J AV
w tfr w V7 wT VT VT wT VT wr VT wT W/ wT V / VT
0)
k.
co
03
in
<D
4-«
"O
a)
!E
in
CL
03
4-i
d)
cn
3
>
d)
C
o
u.
03
4-^
cn
c
<0
E
03
4-»
c
+4
o
cn
03
‘35
c
X
o
w
o
"D
c
(0
u.
d)
03
o
O'
I
o
cd
c
o
03
>-
03
-o
£
5
0)
E
*_
a)
c
c
03
o
in
cn
in
03
d)
03
5
Z
re
5
d>
3
o
>
S
_c
§
5
JO
2
cn
T—
CM
CO
m
m
CO
00
03
o
CM
>
03 O
"O 3
il
LL ^
Q.
Q.
‘55
.52
’5>
CO
03
c
03
03 O
£ j=
O) t
.!= O
> Z
CO CO Tj-
Tt
T*
m
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report 33 June 30, 2003
Appendix F
Capital Fee to Out-of-State Students*
Institutions
Undergraduate
Graduate
George Mason University
$41.00
$41.00
Old Dominion University
$50.00
$50.00
University of Virginia
$50.00
$50.00
Virginia Commonwealth University
$40.00
$40.00
Virginia Tech
$50.00
$50.00
College of William and Mary
$50.00
$50.00
Christopher Newport University
$50.00
$50.00
UVA-Wise
$50.00
$50.00
James Madison University
$50.00
$40.00
Longwood University
$25.00
$25.00
Mary Washington College
$50.00
$30.00
Norfolk State University
$51.00
$40.80
Radford University
$50.00
$50.00
Virginia Military Institute
$60.00
$60.00
Virginia State University
$50.00
$50.00
Richard Bland College
$45.00
$45.00
VA Community College System
$45.00
$45.00
Average 4-Year Institutions
$47.80
$45.12
Average 2-Year Institutions
$45.00
$45.00
Average All Institutions
$47.47
$45.11
Note *New fee charged to out-of-state students starting in FY04. Revenue generated
from this fee shall be paid to the Virginia College of Buildng Authority for debt service
on bonds issued under the 21st Century Program.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
iCHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
33 37
June 30, 2003
Acknowledgements
SCHEV professional staff members Dan Hix and Yan Zheng provided the primary
research and writing of this report. SCHEV also would like to acknowledge and thank the
budget offices of Virginia’s public colleges and universities. The data and information they
submitted to SCHEV serve as the foundation for the analysis within this report.
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
o
CHEV 2003-04 Tuition and Fee Report
34
33
June 30, 2003
STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION FOR VIRGINIA
ADVANCING VIRGINA THROUGH HIGHER EDUCATION
James Honroe Building
101 North Fourteenth Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
Tel: (804) 225-2600
Fax: (804) 225-2604
TDD: (804) 371-8017
Web: www.schev.edu
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
Phyllis Palmiero
Executive Director
39
U.S. Department of Education
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
National Library of Education (NLE)
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
NOTICE
Reproduction Basis
X
This document is covered by a signed "Reproduction Release (Blanket)"
form (on file within the ERIC system), encompassing all or classes of
documents from its source organization and, therefore, does not require a
"Specific Document" Release form.
This document is Federally- funded, or carries its own permission to
reproduce, or is otherwise in the public domain and, therefore, may be
reproduced by ERIC without a signed Reproduction Release form (either
"Specific Document" or "Blanket").
o
ERIC ■F-089 (1/2003)
Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11