Skip to main content

Full text of "Superconductivity in SrFe_(2-x)Co_xAs_2: Internal Doping of the Iron Arsenide Layers"

See other formats


Superconductivity in SrFe2-xCoa;As2: Internal Doping of the Iron Arsenide Layers 



OO 
O 

o 



A. Leithe-Jasper, W. SchncUc, C. Gcibcl, and H. Rosncr 
Max-Planck-Institut fiir Chemische Physik fester Staff e, Nothnitzer Str. 40, 01187 Dresden, Germany 

In the electron doped compounds SrFe2-2!Co2, As2 superconductivity with Tc up to 20 K is observed 
for 0.2 < a; < 0.4. Results of structure determination, magnetic susceptibility, electrical resistivity, 
and specific heat are reported. The observation of bulk superconductivity in all thermodynamic 
properties - despite strong disorder in the Fe-As layer ~ favors an itinerant picture in contrast to 
the cuprates and renders a p- or d-wave scenario unlikely. DFT calculations find that the substitution 
of Fe by Co [x > 0.3) leads to the suppression of the magnetic ordering present in SrFe2As2 due to 
a rigid down-shift of the Fe-3d^2_y2 related band edge in the density of states. 

PACS numbers: 74.10.+V, 74.25.Bt, 74.25. Dw 



o , 

Oh: 



o 



> 

m 

(N 
(N 
(N 

l> 

O 
00 

o 



X 



The observation of superconductivity in layered Fe-As 
systems has recently attracted considerable interest. The 
imdoped compounds, e.g., LaFeAsO [ll, |3| or AFe2As2 {A 
~ Ba, Sr) [sl, y, |5|, present an antifcrromagnetic (afm) 
transition related to a structural transition at tempera- 
tures in the range 140 K to 205 K. Upon doping both the 
structural and the magnetic ordering get suppressed and 
superconductivity with Tc up to 56 K appears [l|, la, |7| ■ 
The onset of superconductivity at the disappearance of 
an afm ordered state induced by charge doping from a 
reservoir layer is reminiscent of the behavior observed in 
the cuprates. Since furthermore Fe and Cu are both Sd 
elements, and because of similarities in the structure of 
the layers, an analogy between the high temperature su- 
perconductivity (HTSC) in the cuprates and the layered 
Fe-As systems was suggested in a large number of re- 
ports. On the other hand, the absence of a Mott-insulator 
transition as well as the small ordered Fe moment in the 
undoped compounds put this analogy into question, and 
suggest that a model based on itinerant and weakly cor- 
related 3d electrons might be more appropriate. 

One way to get deeper insight into these questions is a 
doping experiment on the Fe site. Presently, doping was 
generally performed on sites in-between the Fe-As layers, 
either on the i?-site or the 0-site in the i?FeAsO systems 
or on the A site in the ^Fe2As2 compounds. Such kind 
of doping corresponds, both in a localized and in an itin- 
erant model, to a simple charge doping and is therefore 
not very suitable for discriminating between both mod- 
els. On the other hand, replacing a small amount of Fe 
by another 3d clement should lead to different effects de- 
pending on the model used. In an itinerant model, within 
a simple rigid-band approach, substitution on the Fe site 
is expected to be quite similar to indirect doping via the 
interlayer sites, since only the total number of electrons is 
relevant. In a picture with localized 3d electrons, doping 
on the Fe site should lead to a very different behavior, 
since the correlations in the 3d layers are directly affected 
- a few percent Ni or Zn doping on the Cu site in a HTSC 
cuprate lead to a drastic reduction of Tc- 

Therefore, we investigated thermodynamic proper- 
ties and electrical conductivity of the solid solution 



SrFe2-a;Coa;As2. While pure SrFe2As2 undergoes a lat- 
tice distortion and afm ordering at Tq = 205 K [J|, a 
small amount of Co substitution leads to a rapid de- 
crease of Tq, followed by the onset of superconductivity 
in the concentration range 0.2 < a; < 0.4 with a maxi- 
mum Tc of ~ 20 K. The observation of superconductiv- 
ity in Co substituted SrFc2As2 provides strong evidence 
that an analogy with the HTSC cuprates is not really 
justified. We therefore performed band structure calcu- 
lations and discuss the electronic structure in view of our 
experimental results. The good agreement between cal- 
culations and experimental observations confirms that an 
itinerant approach is appropriate for these layered Fe-As 
systems. The observation of superconductivity despite a 
strong in-layer disorder puts also a strong constraint on 
the possible superconducting order parameters. While 
finalizing our investigation, Sefat et al. [8| and Wang et 
al. [9[ reported the observation of superconductivity in 
Co doped LaFeAsO with a maximum Tc ~ 10 K. While 
their results support our analysis, the higher Tc observed 
in SrFe2_3:COa;As2 establishes much stronger evidence. 

Samples were prepared by a sintering technique in 
glassy-carbon crucibles which were welded into tanta- 
lum containers and sealed into evacuated quartz tubes 
for heat treatment at 900 °C for 16 h followed by two re- 
grinding and compaction steps. First precursors SrAs, 
C02AS and Fe2As were synthesized from elemental pow- 
ders sintered at 600 °C for 48 h (Fe, Co powder, 99.9 
wt.%; As sublimed lumps 99.999 wt.%; Sr 99.99 wt.%. 
These cducts were then powdered, blended in stoichio- 
metric ratios, compacted, and heat treated. All steps 
were carried out within an argon- filled glove box (O2, 
H2O < 1 ppm). This mode of synthesis helps to prevent 
possible contamination by toxic arsenic [lO[. Samples 
were obtained in the form of sintered pellets. 

Metallographic preparations and microstructure inves- 
tigation on polished surfaces with optical microscopy 
were performed in an argon-filled glove box. Electron- 
probe microanalysis (EPMA) with energy dispersive 
analysis was accomplished in a Philips XL30 scanning 
electron microscope. Powder X-ray diffraction was per- 
formed using Co Kal radiation (A = 1.789007 A) apply- 



ing the Guinier Huber technique with LaBg as internal 
standard (a = 4.15692 A). Crystallographic calculations 
were done with the WinCSD program package 11 1 . 

Evaluation of the lattice parameters and EPMA in- 
vestigations of selected samples unambiguously reveals 
the substitution of Fe by Co which is accompanied by a 
decrease of the c axis length of the unit cell (see Table 
m. For the sample SrFe1.8Coo.2As2 which was essentially 
single phase (minor impurity SrAs) the crystal structure 
was refined by Rietfeld methods (BaAU-type of structure 
[12| . space group M/mmm, Sr in 2a (0, 0, 0), Fe/Co in 
4d (0, 1/2, 1/4), As in 4e (0, 0, 0.3613(1)); Ri = 7.4, Rp 
= 10.1). Other samples of this investigation contained as 
minor impurity phases Fei_a;Coa;As. 

Magnetization was measured from 1.8-400 K in a 
SQUID magnetometer in various fields both after zero- 
field cooling (zfc) and during cooling in field (fc). Heat 
capacity was determined by a relaxation-type method on 
a commercial measurement system (1.9-lOOK, 0-9T). 
Electrical dc resistivity data p{T) (3.8-320 K) were col- 
lected with a current density of < 1 x 10~^ Amm~^ in a 
four contact arrangement. Due to the sample geometry 
the inaccuracy in p is estimated to be ±20%. 

To investigate the influence of electron doping on the 
electronic structure of SrFc2As2 on a microscopic level, 
we performed density functional band structure calcu- 
lations within the local (spin) density approximation 
(L(S)DA). Using the experimental structural parameters 
Jl, we applied the full-potential local-orbital code FFLO 
13| (version 7.00-28) with the Perdew-Wang exchange 
correlation potential [1J| and a carefully converged k- 
mesh of 24'^ points for the Brillouin zone. The substitu- 
tion of Fe by Co and Sr by La was simulated within the 
virtual crystal approximation (VCA). 



TABLE I: Lattice parameters a,c of SrFe2-a:Coa;As2 (nom- 
inal compositions) and superconducting transition tempera- 
ture T'^^'s (defined as the crossing of the tangent to the steep- 
est slope of the fc transition with x = 0) , xo is the high-field 
susceptibility at r=0. Data for x=0 are from Ref. [J]. 



X 


a 


c 


^mag 


Xo 




(A) 


(A) 


(K) 


(10"'^emu/mol) 


0.00 


3.924(3) 


12.34(1) 


- 


- 


0.10 


3.9291(1) 


12.3321(7) 


- 


n.a. 


0.15 


3.9272(1) 


12.3123(5) 


<1.8 


+780 


0.20 


3.9278(2) 


12.3026(2) 


19.2 


-h600 


0.25 


3.9296(2) 


12.2925(9) 


18.1 


(-h850) 


0.30 


3.9291(2) 


12.2704(8) 


13.2 


-f460 


0.40 


3.9293(1) 


12.2711(7) 


12.9 


+360 


0.50 


3.9287(2) 


12.2187(9) 


<1.8 


n.a. 


1.00 


3.9618(1) 


11.6378(6) 


- 


n.a. 




The magnetic susceptibility in a nominal field poH 



120 160 200 
T (K) 

FIG. 1: (Color online) Top: magnetic susceptibility x{T) of 
SrFe2-2!Co2,As2 samples in a nominal field of hqH = 2mT. 
Bottom: electrical resistivity of the same samples. 



2mT (Fig. [T] top) displays strong diamagnctic signals in 
zfc due to superconducting transitions in the a;=:0.2-0.4 
samples with onset temperatures T™^^ up to 19.2 K for 
^=0.2 (see Tabic |l]). The compounds with a;=0.1 and 
x—0.5 show no traces of superconductivity. Even for 
this low external field the transitions are slightly rounded 
which indicates that the samples are not fully homoge- 
neous. While the shielding signal (zfc) corresponds to the 
whole sample volume (considering approximate demag- 
netizing factors), the Meissner effect (fc) is much smaller, 
which is probably due to strong pinning. 

The normal-state susceptibilities of the samples a:;=:0.2, 
0.3, and 0.4 arc field-independent for T > 200 K. There, 
the compounds display a paramagnetism which can be 
described by x(T) = Xo + X2T^- The extrapolated xo 
values are given in TablelH Diamagnetic core contribu- 
tions are comparatively small (« —50 x 10~^ emu/mol). 
Due to the current sample quality some caution is neces- 
sary in interpreting xo j but the order of magnitude and 
the temperature dependence is typical for an enhanced 
Pauli paramagnet. Comparing the xo values with the 
electronic density of states at the Fermi level obtained 
from band structure calculations (see below) suggests an 
enhanced Sommerfeld- Wilson ratio, which decreases with 
increasing Co content for x >0.15, in accordance with a 
magnetic instability for x <0.15. SrCo2As2 is a Curie- 
Weiss paramagnet {pcS = 2.06/^B/f-u., 6'cw = — 29K) 
and does not show magnetic ordering above 1.8 K. 

The temperature dependence of the resistivity p{T) 



(Fig. [T] bottom) at high temperatures is generally that of 
a bad metal. p{3QQK) decreases gradually with electron 
doping from 5.5-8.0 ^f^m for a;=0.10"0.15 to 2.0/iSlm 
for a;=0.50, as also observed for K-substituted samples. [3[ 
For a;=0.10 a stepwise increase of p{T) is observed below 
«130K which shifts to «90K for x=0.15. This anomaly 
can be assigned to the afm ordering and the related lat- 
tice distortion observed at ro=205K in SrFe2As2 [i, Q. 
Thus, Co substitution (electron doping) leads to the sup- 
pression of the afm order in a similar way as reported for 
the K-substitution (hole doping) [15[. For a;=0.20 no 
such anomaly is seen and the compound shows a super- 
conducting transition at 19.4 K. 




FIG. 2: (Color online) Molar isobaric specific heat Cp/T^ of 
SrFe2-i:Coi:As2 samples (x=0.2; x=0.3 shifted up by 3 units) 
for different magnetic fields. For better distinction the data 
for hqH — are connected by a line. 

In Fig. [2] the specific heat Cp{T) for two selected sam- 
ples is presented in a Cp{T)/T^ versus T plot. Strongly 
rounded anomalies with onset at Tc as determined by 
p{T) and x{T) data are clearly visible confirming that the 
superconductivity is a bulk phenomen in these samples. 
The idealized step heights Acp and the transition temper- 
atures T^^^ were evaluated by a fit with a phononic back- 
ground and an electronic contribution according to the 
BCS theory or the phenomcnological two-liquid model 
which applies well to the thermodynamic properties of 
some strong coupling superconductors. The model is con- 
voluted with a Gaussian to simulate the broadening due 
to the chemical inhomogcneitics. 



T^ Debye lattice term, i.e. Cp{T) = j'T+f3T^. While /3 is 
field-independent and corresponds to a lattice term with 
initial Debye temperature 8d(0) = 255(2) K for both 
a;=0.2 and 0.3, the linear term 7' increases nearly lin- 
early with field. For a;=0.2 the values of 7' range from 
12.6 mJ mol-i at p.aH = OT to 17.5 at 9T. Whether 
the residual 7' is induced by defects (see e.g. Ref. [16|) or 
whether it is an intrinsic contribution due to ungapped 
parts of the Fermi surface [17| has to be elucidated by 
further experiments. While we cannot make a definite 
statement on the superconducting coupling strength the 
better fit is obtained for a;=0.2 and the two-fluid model 
while for a;=0.3 the BCS fit is superior. This might indi- 
cate a variation of the coupling strength with Co content. 



— undoped 

— Co doped 

— La doped 




Acp/T, 



cal 



ilO mJ mol-i K~2 ^j. 3,^0.2 and «13 mJ 



mol ^ K ^ for x=0.3. Interestingly, well below Tc the 
specific heat can still be described with a linear plus a 



-1 

Energy (eV) 

FIG. 3; (Color online) Total electronic densities of states 
for SrFe2As2 (black), SrFe1.7Coo.3As2 (red) and the fictitious 
Sro.7Lao.3Fe2As2 (blue) in the vicinity of the Fermi level. In- 
set: dependence of the magnetic moment on the number of 
additionally doped electrons per formula unit for doping at 
the Fe site (red) and at the Sr site (blue), respectively. 

For a microscopic study of the influence of doping with 
electrons on the electronic structure in the vicinity of the 
Fermi level ep, we simulated two different kinds of par- 
tial constituent exchange: (i) Co substitution at the Fe 
site and (ii) a fictitious La substitution at the Sr site 
to study possible differences for doping (i) within and 
(ii) outside the FcAs layers. Throughout all calculations 
we used the experimental lattice parameters [J] of the 
undoped SrFe2As2 to separate the influence of geome- 
try changes and pure electronic doping effects. Since the 
changes of the lattice parameters upon doping are very 
small (see Table|l| this approach is well justified. The re- 
sulting total density of states (DOS) for the Fe-3d domi- 
nated regions of the valence band for SrFe2-a;Coa;As2 and 
Sri_a;La3;Fe2As2, respectively, is shown in Fig. [3] for an 
exemplary doping level of a;=0.3. 

The two kinds of doping result in a rather different be- 
havior. Whereas (i) Co doping on the iron site results in 
an almost perfectly rigid shift of the DOS for all studied 



doping levels between x=0 and x=Q.5, (ii) exchange of Sr 
by La can't be described at all in a rigid band picture in 
the vicinity of ep (see Fig. [3]). In the case of Co substitu- 
tion, a detailed analysis of the orbital-resolved DOS, the 
corresponding bands and band characters shows that the 
rigid band picture holds even for the individual orbitals 
close to ep. In contrast, the substitution (ii) of Sr by La 
shifts down the energy and changes the dispersion of a 
band with Fe-As-Sr hybrid character in a way that it gets 
partially occupied, whereas other bands remain basically 
unchanged. In consequence, this leads to the formation 
of a quite pronounced peak at ep and a sizable increase 
of the DOS (sec Fig.[3|). In general, from the experimen- 
tal results for the i?FeAsO and the AFe2As2 compound 
family it seems that the appearance of superconductivity 
at low temperatures is intrinsically related to the prior 
destruction of the spin density wave. Therefore, we stud- 
ied the instability towards magnetism depending on the 
doping level for both doping scenarios (i) and (ii). In Fig. 
|3]we plot the size of the ordered Fe moment correspond- 
ing to the minimum in total energy in the VCA-LSDA 
calculations as a function of Co or La substitution, (ii) 
While La substitution stabilizes the magnetic state, elec- 
tron doping by (i) Co leads to the disappearance of the 
magnetic ground state at a;=0.3. 

The disappearance of the magnetic instability is inti- 
mately connected with the occupation of the Fc-3d^2_y2 
related band along the F-Z direction as previously 
demonstrated [J] for the undoped compound (depending 
on the As z position). For .t=0.3 (see Fig. [3]) the related 
band edge is situated right at Ef, leading to a reduced 
DOS and thus to the destruction of the magnetic state. 
In contrast, the tendency towards magnetism would be 
increased for (ii) La substitution. The DOS enhancement 
upon La substitution might lead to an instability of the 
Sri_2.La2;Fe2As2 phase, which could be the reason why 
such compositions have not yet been reported. 

The non-magnetic ground state for x < 0.3 in 
SrFe2-a;Coa;As2 in the VCA-LSDA calculations is in sur- 
prisingly good agreement with the experimentally ob- 
served suppression of the magnetic state and the onset 
of superconductivity for .t=0.2. In fact, the used VCA 
should result in an overestimate of the stability of a mag- 
netic ground state since it does not include the direct in- 
fluence of disorder in the Fe-As layer. Most likely, the 
doped Co impurities are in a non-magnetic state, in- 
dicated by calculations for SrCo2As2 that yield a non 
magnetic ground state in agreement with our measure- 
ments. Thus, a more sophisticated treatment of the Co 
impurities should lead to a sizable reduction of the crit- 
ical concentration x for the suppression of the magnetic 
instability, in line with our experimental results. 

In summary, we synthesized polycrystalline 
SrFe2-a;Coa;As2 samples and investigated how elec- 
tron doping within the Fe-As layers affects the magnetic 
and electronic properties of this kind of compounds. We 



found that Co substitution suppresses the afm transition 
and the associated lattice distortion quite rapidly, from 
To = 205 K at x=0 to Tq w 90K at 1-0.15. For j:=0.2 
afm order is destroyed and bulk superconductivity 
with a Tc « 20 K appears. Further increase of the Co 
content leads to a reduction of Tc and finally to the 
disappearance of superconductivity for x < 0.5. Thus 
electron doping within the Fe-As layer by substituting 
Co for Fe has a similar effect as hole doping in-between 
the layers by substituting K for Sr, or as electron doping 
by substituting F for O in LaFeAsO. 

The observation of superconductivity upon substitu- 
tion on the 3d site in the layered Fe-As systems is in 
strong contrast to the behavior in cuprates, where substi- 
tution on the Cu site lead to a fast suppression of super- 
conductivity. This indicates that the suggested analogy 
between HTSC in cuprates and in Fe-As systems is not 
appropriate. Instead we observe a rigid-band like shift 
of the DOS to lower energy upon Co substitution. The 
suppression of the afm state, which occurs in the cal- 
culations at a;=0.3, is connected with the d^2_y2 states 
being pushed below the Fermi level. In contrast electron 
doping by substituting La for Sr leads in the calculation 
to a change in the dispersion and energy of a Fe-As-Sr 
hybrid band. The resulting increase of the DOS at ep 
stabilizes the afm state and might induce an instability 
of the SrFe2 As2 phase. The nice correspondence between 
the experiments and VCA-LSDA band structure calcu- 
lations indicates that an approach based on itinerant, 
weakly correlated 3d electrons is more appropriate for 
the description of the Fe-As systems than an approach 
based on localized 3d moments within a Hubbard model. 

We thank U. Burkhardt, T. Vogel, R. Koban, K. 
Kreutzigcr, Yu. Prots, and R. Gumeniuk for assistance. 



[1] 

[2] 
[3] 

[4] 

[5] 

[6] 

[7] 

[8] 

[9] 

[10] 

[11] 
[12] 



Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, 

J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008). 

C. de la Cruz et al.. Nature 453, 899 (2008). 

M. Rotter, M. Tegel, I. Schellenberg, W. Hermes, 

R. Pottgen, and D. Johrendt (2008), arXiv:Q8Q5.4021. 

C. Krellner, N. Caroca-Canales, A. Jesche, H. Rosner, 

A. Ormeci, and C. Geibel (2008), arXiv:Q8Q6.1209vl. 

M. Tegel, M. Rotter, V. Weiss, F. M. Schappacher, 

R. Pottgen, and D. Johrendt (2008), arXiv:0806.4782vl. 

M. Rotter, M. Tegel, and D. Johrendt (2008), 

arXiv:0805.4630vl. 

C. Wang et al. (2008), arXiv:0804.4290. 

A. S. Sefat et al. (2008), arXiv:0807.0823vl. 
C. Wang et al. (2008), arXiv;0807.1304vl. 

J. O. Nriagu, Arsenic in the environment, human health 

and ecosystem effects, part II (Wiley, 1994). 

L. G. Akselrud, P. Y. Zavalii, Yu. Grin, V. K. Pecharsky, 

B. Baumgartner, and E. Wolfel, Mater. Sci. Forum 133- 
136, 335 (1993). 

K. R. Andress and E. Alberti, Z. Metallkde. 27, 126 
(1935). 



[13] K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743 [16] G. Triscone and A. Junod, in Bismuth-based High- 

(1999). Temperature Superconductors, edited by H. Maeda and 

[14] J. P. Perdew and Y. Wang, Phys. Rev. B 45, 13244 K. Togano (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1996), pp. 33-74. 

(1992). [17] S. L. Drechsler at al., Physica B 329, 1352 (2003). 

[15] G. F. Chen et al. (2008), arXiv:0806.1209vl.