Skip to main content

Full text of "IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae"

See other formats


Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. distancel4 © ESO 2010 

July 7, 2010 



Received September 15, 1996; accepted March 16, 1997 

ABSTRACT 



IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

C. Giammanco 1 ' 12 , S. E. Sale 2 , R. L. M. Corradi 1 - 12 , M. J. Barlow 3 , K. Viironen 1 ' 13 ' 14 , L. Sabin 4 , M. 
Santander-Garcia 5 ' 1 ' 12 , D. J. Frew 6 , R. Greimel 7 , B. Miszalski 10 , S. Phillipps 8 , A. A. Zijlstra 9 , A. Mampaso 112 , J. 

Drew 2 ' 10 , Q. A. Parker 6 ' 11 and R. Napiwotzki 10 . 

1 Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias (IAC), C/ Via Lactea s/n, 38200 La Laguna, Spain 
e-mail: corrado@iac.es 

2 Astrophysics Group, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, U.K. 

3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Cower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK 

4 Instituto de Astronomia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Apdo. Postal 877, 22800 Ensenada, B.C., Mexico 

5 Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Ap. de Correos 321, 38700 Sta. Cruz de la Palma, Spain 

6 Department of Physics, Macquarie University, NSW 2109, Australia 

7 Institut fiir Physik, Karl-Franzens Universitat Graz, Universitatsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria 

8 Astrophysics Group, Department of Physics, Bristol University, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, U.K. 

9 Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PL, 
Manchester, U.K. 

10 Centre for Astrophysics Research, STRI, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, ALIO 9AB, U.K. 

11 Anglo-Australian Observatory, PO Box 296, Epping, NSW 1710, Australia 

12 Departamento de Astrofisica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 

13 Centro Astronomico Hispano Aleman, Calar Alto, C/Jesus Durban Remon 2-2, E-04004 Almeria, Spain 
•^T 14 Centro de Estudios de Fisica del Cosmos de Aragon (CEFCA), C/General Pizarro 1-1, E-44001 Teruel, Spain 

o 

Aims. The determination of reliable distances to Planetary Nebulae (PNe) is one of the major limitations in the study of this class 
of objects in the Galaxy. The availability of new photometric surveys such as IPHAS covering large portions of the sky gives us the 
C/3 ' opportunity to apply the "extinction method" to determine distances of a large number of objects. 

Methods. The technique is applied to a sample of 137 PNe located between -5 and 5 degrees in Galactic latitude, and between 29.52 
and 215.49 degrees in longitude. The characteristics of the distance-extinction method and the main sources of errors are carefully 
discussed. 

Results. The data on the extinction of the PNe available in the literature, complemented by new observations, allow us to determine 
•^T i extinction distances for 70 PNe. A comparison with statistical distance scales from different authors is presented. 

^^ . Conclusions. 

CO 

Key words. Planetary nebulae: general, individual distances - Methods: data analysis 

o, 

C "I- Introduction 34 other ones, and more recently by Gathier et al. (1986) who 

*~H . measured the distance to 12 PNe using some 50 stars per PN. 

L| | Distances to Galactic planetary nebulae (PNe) present a severe In the last paper, a comprehensive discussion about different as- 

^h ', and longstanding problem. Obtaining an accurate distance scale pects of this method can be found. The number of stars for de- 

^ . for PNe will allow us to compute the total number of PNe in termining distances was increased by Pollacco & Ramsay (1992) 

$H [ the Galaxy, which has important implications for the Galactic who, using a colour analysis of the field stars, were able to reach 

ultraviolet radiation field, the total processed mass returned to an accurate spectral classification for stars later than F5 type. 

the interstellar medium, and more generally to our understanding As late-type stars constitute the most numerous objects in all 

of the chemical evolution of the Galaxy. galactic -plane directions, they allow an extensive application of 

A method that is a priori independent of assumptions about this method to determine distances to PNe in the Galaxy, 
the physical or geometrical properties of the nebulae is the ex- The availability of the IPHAS Ha survey of the Northern 
Unction method. Assuming that the interstellar extinction to a Galactic Plane (Drew et al. 2005) and its coming extension to 
certain nebula can be determined, if one is able to build up the the South (V PHAS+) opens new doors for the application of 
extinction-distance relation using field stars around the line of the met hod. IPHAS allows us to determine extinction-distance 
sight to the nebula, the relation can be used to infer the distance curves using a large number of field starSi typically seve ral hun- 
to the FJN. (jj-gj m areas as sma u as 10' x 10' around each line of sight. The 
The application of this method is not new. Lutz (1973) mea- technique is presented and discussed by Sale et al. (2009). In this 
sured the distance to 6 PNe using some 10 field stars per object, paper, we will present its application to Galactic PNe. We deter- 
Later, the method was applied by Acker (1978) who provided mine the distance to 70 PNe included in the ESO/Strasbourg cat- 
reliable distance values for 11 PNe and a rough estimation for alogue (Acker et al. 1992), and compare the distances obtained 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 



with those obtained by other authors using different methods. 
This shows how IPHAS and its successor surveys potentially 
provide a new and powerful tool to obtain distances to a large 
number of Galactic PNe. 



2. The data 

IPHAS is a wide-field, CCD, Ha survey of the Northern Galactic 
Plane (Drew et al., 2005), carried out at the 2.5m Isaac Newton 
Telescope on La Palma, Spain. Imaging is performed also in the 
r' and i' bands down to r' ~ 20 (10<x). The high quality photom- 
etry and characteristics of the survey permit the spectral classi- 
fication of main-sequence stars to be determined, based on the 
Ha line strength. The availability of reliably calibrated (r' - H ff ) 
colours permit the spectral classification of most stars, while the 
(r'- i') colour provides their extinctions, allowing distances to be 
estimated from the r' measurements. The limiting magnitude in 
r' permits extinctions to be measured to distances of up ~ 10 
kpc. 

IPHAS covers the Galactic latitude range between -5 and 
5 deg, and longitude range between 29.52 and 215.49. In this 
region of the sky there are 190 known PNe according to the 
ESO/Strasbourg catalogue (Acker et al., 1992). We were able 
to extract a reddening for 137 of them from different sources; 
for 27 PNe we present the first determinations. 

2.1. PN extinctions extracted from the literature 

The ESO/Strasbourg catalog provides the H a /Hp line ratio for 
most of the PNe considered here. These data were measured 
from spectra obtained using two different telescopes: the 1.52m 
ESO telescope for the Southern nebulae, and the 1.93m OHP 
telescope for the Northern ones. Further details about the instru- 
ments (photographic plate or CCD) and spectra can be found 
in Acker et al. (1992, SECGPN), Acker & Stenholm (1987), 
and Stenholm & Acker (1987). Later, Tylenda et al. (1992) used 
these SECGPN line intensities to obtain the value of the extinc- 
tion constant roughly determined for about 900 PNe. In this pa- 
per the visual extinction was obtained from the line ratios by 
applying the formulae: 



t> - J.84 ■ loo ( ___^_ 1 



2.86 



A v = 2.15-cg 



(1) 



(2) 



which come from Fitzpatrick (2004). Here we assumed R=3.1, 
in order to be consistent with the method by which the IPHAS 
extinction curves are built (see section[3]). 

Other compilations from which cp was retrieved are Cahn 
et al. (1992) and in few cases Stasihska et al. (1992). The latter 
paper compared the optical and radio extinction determinations, 
using the same "SECGPN" line fluxes as Tylenda et al. (1992), 
and adding some other measurements, for a total of 130 PNe. 
For individual nebulae, these listings where supplemented with 
data from other papers, where available. In all cases, when in a 
paper the assumed reddening law is reported, we normalize the 
published extinction using Eqs. (Q]) and (0. Specifically, this is 
the case for data in Cahn et al. (1992) and Stasihska et al. (1992). 
For most of the nebulae the only available extinction coefficient 
comes from the Strasbourg catalog, while for a subset there are 
multiple determinations. For a small number of nebulae there is a 
very extensive literature; and in those cases we selected what we 
believe is the most accurate determination of cp after a careful 



1 r 



0E 













./I 






(7=0.41 






: 










+ 


: 








+ yS 




- 












+ - 


^"+ 






X + + 




- 








+ + / + 




- 








+ x 




_ 






+ 


X + + 




: 








/ 4- 






' r 




+ + +>*' 


+ 




- 


++ 


+ 


+ +/ + 


+ 




: 






: 


. 


. 


: 



12 3 4 

Strasbourg 

Fig. 1. cp measurements by by Cahn et al. (1992) plotted against 
data in Acker et al. (1992). The dispersion is around 0.4 in cp. 



analysis of bibliographic sources. In addition, for some nebulae 
we also present new optical cp determinations. 

A general rule in case of multiple determinations and in 
the absence of other information (the quality of one measure- 
ment with respect to another) is to choose the smallest cp. The 
main reason is that slit spectra taken at non-negligible zenith dis- 
tances are often affected by differential atmospheric dispersion 
which removes blue light leading to an overestimate of the cp's. 
Extinction measurements obtained via radio data are free from 
this effect, but these give extinctions systematically lower than 
those determined from the Balmer decrement (Stasihska et al., 
1992, Ruffle et al. 2004). In order to deal with a homogeneous 
set of measurements, we will only consider in this paper cp ob- 
tained via optical measurements. 

Finally, in order to illustrate the differences between extinc- 
tion determinations by different authors, we show in Fig. Q] the 
cp values obtained by Cahn et al. (1992) versus those com- 
puted from fluxes in the ESO/Strasbourg catalog. The associ- 
ated scatter is cr — 0.41, which shows how critical the choice 
of the extinction values can be. We note that data from the 
ESO/Strasbourg catalog are not all of the same quality, those 
for the Northern nebulae (56 < I < 184) observed at the OHP 
being generally of lower quality than those of (mainly Southern) 
nebulae observed at ESO. 

2.2. New extinction determinations 

26 PNe considered in this paper (see Tabs. 1 and 3) were ob- 
served at the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope at the Observatorio 
del Roque de los Muchachos, from August 23 to 30, 1997. 
The IDS spectrograph was used, together with its R300V grat- 
ing, which gives a reciprocal dispersion of 3.31 A per pixel of 
the lkxlk Tek3 detector, and a spectral coverage from 3700 to 
6900 A. The slit width was 1 .5 arcsec projected on the sky, pro- 
viding a spectral resolution of 6.7 A. Total exposure times on 
each nebula varied from a few seconds for the brightest target 
(NGC 7027) up to one hour for the faintest ones; exposures 
were split in order to have both the bright and faint nebular 
lines well exposed without saturation. Several spectrophotomet- 
ric standards were observed during each night for relative flux 
calibration. Data reduction was performed using the package 
onedspec in IRAF 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 



An additional two PNe (PC 20 and Sa 3-151) were observed 
with the Dual Beam Spectrograph (DBS, Rodgers et a. 1988) on 
May 10 and 14 2008 by B. Miszalski at the Australian National 
University 2.3-m telescope. The exposure times were 300 s and 
150 s, respectively to achieve a SNR of about 20 in the peak in- 
tensity of H^. The 1200B and 1200R gratings were used with 
a slit width of 2"(positioned at PA - 270 deg) to give wave- 
length coverage windows of 4030-5050 A and 6245-7250 A at 
a resolution of ~ 1.6 A (FWHM). Data reduction was performed 
using IRAF and a number of flux standards were observed each 
night to derive the spectrophotometric response across the sepa- 
rate blue and red spectrograph arms. 



3. IPHAS extinction-reddening curves for the PNe 

Extinction-distance relationships for the lines of sight toward 
the sample of 136 Galactic PNe in the IPHAS area have been 
computed with the algorithm MEAD, as described by Sale et al. 
(2009). MEAD exploits a feature of the IPHAS colour-colour 
plane, whereby it is possible to simultaneously accurately deter- 
mine the spectral type of a star and its reddening, avoiding the 
serious degeneracies that exist in other filter systems and with 
only a slight dependence on a Galactic model. 

Typically, several thousand A to K4 stars in a box of sides 
10', centred on the PNe, have been employed in the computation 
of each relationship. Distances to each star are obtained from 
their apparent magnitude, the MEAD extinction , and the abso- 
lute magnitude of the star derived from the MEAD spectral type. 
The photometric errors are propagated to give an error on the 
estimated distance to each star. The stars were then binned by 
distance, with each bin being at least 100 pc deep, containing at 
least 8 stars and having a total signal to noise ratio in the bin of 
at least 130. In a small departure from the method described in 
Sale et al. (2009), the prior probabilities of each luminosity class 
are determined on a sightline by sightline basis. MEAD returns 
monochromatic extinctions, these have then been converted to 
A v using the R=3.1 reddening law of Fitzpatrick (1999). 



4. The inversion of Distance-Extinction curves 

The extinction-distance curves obtained are in general linear for 
a significant range of distances, until they generally flatten out 
and reach an asymptotic value once the line of sight leaves the 
dust layer within the Galactic Plane (Fig. |2). Even in the cases 
where they show a more complex shape, it is generally possi- 
ble to select a linear region around the point in which we are 
interested, e.g. the A v measured for the nebula. 

We assume that the measured A V; ; are distributed around a 
true value A* . = a + bd\ following a Gaussian law whose disper- 
sion is cr A . If so, a least square fit to the selected part of the curve 
allows us to determine all the needed parameters. Specifically, 
around a point, for each d, the probability-distribution to mea- 
sure a given A v is P(A v |if). The next step is to invert the proba- 
bility distribution, i.e. to obtain the probability to find a distance 
d for a given A Vj ;: P(af|A Vj ;). 

We note that: 



NGC 6894 - PNG069.4. + 02.6 



P(d|A Vii ) 



P(A v ,ikQ 
/P(A v |d)dA v 



(3) 




Fig. 2. Extinction law within 10' x 10' around the line of sight 
toward the NGC 6894. The measured extinction of the nebula is 
also indicated by the horizontal line, and the two vertical lines 
limit the interval in which the law is linear and which we have 
used to find the corresponding distance to the PN. 



Gaussian. We call the central value of this distribution d^ and cr c \ 
the dispersion. It follows that 



dp, = (A Vj i - a)/b, 

and 

o-d = <r A /b. 



(4) 



(5) 



In Fig. |2] we show as an example the well defined extinction 
curve along the line of sight towards NGC 6894. For this nebula, 
the measured extinction value is Cp - 0.67, or A v = 1.44 (data 
from Ciardullo et al., 1999). The limits for the selected linear 
range are 800 and 2300 pc (sensitivity range of the method). 
The estimated distance is d — 1000 pc and the formal standard 
deviation is <x rf = 150 pc. We stress that the formal <x is only part 
of the total uncertainty, whose major contribution is due to the 
error in cp measurement; other uncertainties we will consider in 
the following section. 

In order to simplify the discussion in the next section about 
the uncertainty introduced by the inaccuracies in A v , we will fix 
representative values the parameters b and cr rf . This is done by 
analysing almost two hundred lines of sight. We found a repre- 
sentative mean value for the parameter b of 6.53-10 -4 mag/pc 
(FigFJJl, and a typical error in the fitting process of around 10%. 
A test distance of 2500 pc is also assumed. This is in the middle 
of the range over which the extinction-distance method is sensi- 
tive for the low Galactic latitude coverage that characterizes the 
IPHAS survey. This range was calculated by taking the mean of 
the lower and upper limits of the linear interval corresponding 
to each curve. For the adopted distance, the typical error for the 
fitting process is around 250 pc. If so, we can express the relative 
uncertainty for the distance as: 



E = 



and using the previous assumptions of linearity and Gaussian 
distribution for P(A v |<i), the new distribution for P(<i|A v ) is itself 



V250 2 + (o-av/6.53 10- 4 ) 2 
2500 

_ cr Av /6.53 10~ 4 
~ 2500 



(6) 



(7) 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 



c 

•1! 

W 
<l> 



0.6 


I : 


0.5 




: 


0.4 




-E 


0.3 






-. 


0.2 






-= 


0.1 






! 






: 






- 


o n 






i 





0.001 0.002 0.003 

Value of the slope b [mag pc~ 1 ] 

Fig. 3. Distribution of the values of the slope b mag/pc obtained 
from a linear fit of the interstellar extinction curves. We analyzed 
more than 100 lines of sight corresponding to the know PNe 
in the IPHAS survey. Almost 80% of the values are distributed 
between 1.3- 10~ 4 and 8- 10~ 4 

where E is the total uncertainty and £av is the contribution of 
A v . From the previous formulae for cr Av =0.16 (cr c y 3 =0.077) we 
obtain £av ~10% and E ~14%. Finally we note that the pre- 
vious formulae are exact in the case of purely statistical errors, 
otherwise they represent a lower limit to the true uncertainty. 

5. On the errors 

In section|2]we saw how large the difference can be between the 
cp values determined for the same nebula by different authors. 
The origin of these differences could be systematic errors due 
to the instruments or in the reduction processes. Unfortunately 
it is impossible to quantify a priori this effect. However, in 
the determination of the interstellar reddening and hence of the 
extinction-distance there are other sources of uncertainty that we 
discuss below. 



5. 1 . Sources of error relevant for all objects 

In order to determine the visual extinction to a PN, it is common 
to use the H^/Hs ratio. However, often the literature data quote 
only the extinction coefficient cp. In some cases, the adopted 
extinction law is also quoted, in such a way that we can con- 
vert the c^'s to a common scale, that we adopt to be the law 
given in Fitzpatrick (2004), for R=3.1, for a theoretical ratio 
^^=2.86. 

The first uncertainty that we consider is that associated with 
the theoretical H ff /Hg ratio as a function of the electron temper- 
ature, for case B. Using Osterbrock (2005) for this ratio we find 
that if the electron temperature varies between 8000 and 20000 
K, the largest error that we would make by adopting a ratio of 
2.86 is 0.04 dex in cp, or 0.09 mag in visual extinction. This im- 
plies an uncertainty of up to 11% in the distance determination. 

The second error source that we consider is the adopted ex- 
tinction law. Several authors use extinction laws different from 
that adopted in this paper. For example, Stasinska et al. (1992) 
used the Seaton (1979) law assuming R=3.2, Cahn et al. (1992) 
used the Whitford (1958) law (R=3.2), while the Howarth (1983, 
R=3.1) law was used by other authors. The maximum difference 
between our adopted law occurs when the Cardelli et al. (1989) 



law is used. We conservatively adopt this difference when the 
extinction law is not quoted in a paper from which the cp for a 
specific PN is adopted. This results in a difference of 15% in cp, 
or o"Av= 0.3 (for A v =2), and a contribution to the error on the 
distance of about 20%. 

Another common hypothesis is that the characteristics of the 
interstellar dust are constant for all lines of sight, and corre- 
spond to R - 3.1, the mean value of the Milk Way. Fitzpatrick 
(1999) and Fitzpatrick & Massa (2007) state that for optical 
wavelengths a single value of R is a good approximation, but 
R can vary for different lines of sight. Several authors report 
R ~ 2 through the galactic bulge (Byun 1996, Udalski 2003, 
Ruffle et al. 2005) and towards the halo (Larson and Whittet, 
2005). Stasinska et al. (1992), based on the study of a sample of 
PNe, suggest that for the Galactic Plane a more appropriate value 
is R - 2.5. The parameter R could be instead significantly larger 
if the line of sight crosses a dense dust cloud (due to the gen- 
erally larger size of the grains). However, it would be unlikely 
to be able to detect the blue part of the spectrum of PNe (and 
thus their Hp flux) along such highly extinguished directions. In 
general, the R value for a particular nebula can in principle be de- 
termined if the number of Balmer lines measured with precision 
is large enough. 

Therefore, we cannot exclude variations of R for our IPHAS 
sample. Having adopted R = 3.1 as a common value, we es- 
timate the error that we make if the true extinction ratio were 
2.1 or 5.5 (maximum and minimum values from Fitzpatrick, 
1999 and Fitzpatrick & Massa 2007). For the case R = 2.1, the 
Fitzpatrick law gives A v = 4.8 ■ log^^/H^^^) while we use 
A v = 6. l-log(H a ./H / g/2.86). This results in an overestimate of A v 
by some 21% , ot6av= 0.4 (for A v =2). However, in this case the 
corresponding distance extinction curve is also overestimated by 
about 15% (section [3). This means that when determining dis- 
tances these errors partially compensate and the corresponding 
overestimate of A v is of about 6% , or about 12% for a distance 
of 2500 pc. For R = 5.5, we underestimate A,, by some 33% , 
but the corresponding extinction curve is also underestimated by 
25% , so that a final compensated error is 8% in A v , or ~14% for 
the distance. 

5.2. Error coming from the object's properties 

An additional uncertainty resides in the hypothesis that the inter- 
stellar medium is responsible for all the reddening measured for 
a PN from the Balmer decrement, in other words, that the PNe 
are free of internal or circumnebular absorbing dust (for a review 
see Barlow, 1983). This hypothesis is in general supported by the 
study of Koppen (1977) which, assuming that in a planetary neb- 
ula the dust and gas components are well mixed, finds that the 
nebular dust optical depth is very small (r < 0.05), for a dust/gas 
ratio around 10" 3 , However this could be too simple a picture, 
and in this original work there were also some PNe (6 out of a 
total of 21) with evidence for associated extinction. The effect is 
probably negligible for standard, elliptical PNe (Barlow, 1983), 
but could be more significant for particular nebular morpholo- 
gies, such as that of bipolar PNe from massive progenitors (e.g. 
Corradi & Schwarz 1995) which can have massive neutral equa- 
torial envelopes. There is some evidence in the literature that this 
might be the case. 

The most studied example of the latter type is NGC 7027. 
Osterbrock (1974) estimated a maximum internal absoption of 
0.6 mag. Woodward et al. (1992) suggested that the obscuring 
dust lies in a shell or disc external to the ionized gas, and re- 
cently Bieging et al. (2008) found variations of cp from 0.8 to 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 



2.4. A variation of A v has been measured also for NGC 650-1 
between the SW and NE limits of the central emission bar by 
Ramos-Larios et al. (2008). Other type-I bipolar nebulae, such 
as Sh 2-71, K 3-94, K 4-55 and M 1-75, show some evidence for 
(generaly modest) extinction variations through their structures 
(Bohigas 1994, 2001). Extreme variations are reached for NGC 
6302 and NGC 6537 (Matsuura et al. 2005a, 2005b). 

There are also a few indications of associated extinction for 
non-bipolar morphologiefl In this context an interesting object 
is NGC 6741, for which Sabbadin et al. (2005) find a circumneb- 
ular neutral halo generated during a recombination phase follow- 
ing the fading of the central star. This halo was estimated to be 
responsible for 10-20% of the measured total cp. The Helix neb- 
ula (NGC 7293) seems to be a very complex object where dust, 
ionized and molecular gas cohabit (Speck et al. 2002). Dense 
knots in a PN could also evolve in absorbing filaments, as re- 
ported by O'Dell et al. (2003) for the bipolar PN IC 4406. 

For NGC 6781, Mavromatakis et al. (2001) provide a 2D 
Balmer decrement map, finding variations of H a /Hp ranging 
from 5.6 to 7. Though smaller, similar structures are also visi- 
ble in a similar map obtained for Menzel 1 by Monteiro et al. 
(2005). 

Summarizing, in some cases care has to be taken when 
determining the interstellar extinction, especially for particular 
geometries (bipolar). However, due to the small number of 
studies it is difficult to estimate the percentage of objects 
belonging to these categories whose interstellar extinction could 
be wrongly estimated. In any case the number of bipolar PNe 
is 15% of the total number of planetary nebulae (Corradi & 
Schwarz, 1995), and from this sub-sample significant unrecog- 
nized errors are probable only for distant, spatially unresolved 
objects. We can conclude that only a small fraction of our 
total sample will be affected by this kind of uncertainty in the 
estimate. 

Concluding, at present the major contribution to the uncer- 
tainty on the distances is due to the A v 's error measurements. For 
two nebulae, NGC 6842 and NGC 7048, our own measurements 
allows us to estimate these errors. Combining it to the statistical 
fitting error leads to a final uncertainty on the distance of about 
35%. 



6. Distance determinations for the NGC sample 

In order to minimize the uncertainties we will infer the distances 
for a sample of very well known PNe in the IPHAS area, shown 
in TableQ] 

The first PN is NGC 6741 (PNG 033.8-02.6, Fig.|4) which, 
as discussed in the previous section, was found to have non- 
negligible internal extinction by Sabbadin et al. (2005). We use 
the interstellar value given in the same paper to determine its 
distance. The reported error on the distance comes from the sta- 
tistical <Td- This also applies to the other PNe in this section, 
except for NGC 6842 and NGC 7048 as discussed later. 

For NGC 6781 (PNG 041.8-02.9, Fig.g), adopting all the 
reported values of A v , from the minimum value inferred by 
Mavromatakis et al. (2001) to the maximum value obtained in 
this paper, we get a distance smaller than 1000 pc. We can not 
be more precise since the curve is not determined within this 
range. However, the result is in line with that of Schwarz and 



1 Note the possible morphological misclassification of a fraction of 
PNe due to orientation effects: see Manchado (2004) 



Monteiro (2006), who found a distance of 750 pc using 3D pho- 
toionization modeling. 

For NGC 6804 (PNG 045.7-04.5, Fig. Hi, we use the deter- 
mination of A v obtained by Ciardullo et al. (1 999), using Hubble 
images. The graph has been transfered to the Fitzpatrick law 
(R - 3.1), which is our adopted law for the interstellar extinc- 
tion. In this case, the inferred distance is < 800 pc, while from 
our measurement of cp and the corresponding error we estimate 
850 + 70 pc. This is a factor of 2 smaller than the statistical 
distances reported by Cahn et al. (1992) and van de Steene & 
Zijlstra (1994). The error on the statistical scales is typically 
30% (lcr), so that these values do not exlude the much shorter 
(and with a smaller uncertainty) distance found here. In favour 
of the smaller distance, we also note that the risk of the extinc- 
tion method is a tendency to over-estimate distances. Moreover, 
this is a bipolar nebula for which it may will be possible that the 
measured extinction is significantly bigger than the interstellar 
component due to absorbing structure associated with the PN. 

In our method, the only circumstance in which we can under- 
estimate the distance is if the parameter,/? > 3.1. This can occur 
when the line of sight intersects a dense molecular cloud (a rare 
event). The map of dense molecular clouds in the Galaxy given 
by Hartmann & Thaddeus (2001) does not show any clouds at 
these coordinates. So we recommend the use of our estimated 
range < 800 pc, which is also near the estimate of 870 pc by 
Frew (private communication, Frew et al. 2010 in preparation), 
based on a relationship between size and surface brightness for 
PNe. 

For NGC 6803 (PNG 046.4-04.1, Fig.ffll, using the extinc- 
tion value determined by Peimbert & Torres-Peimbert (1987) 
(cg=0.53, A v = 1.14), we infer a distance of 950 pc, again less 
than half the previously reported estimates. Even using the much 
higher values of cp presented by Cahn et al. (1992) we obtain a 
smaller distances (2100±300pc) than those previously reported. 

For the nearby nebula NGC 6853 (PNG 060.8-03.6, Fig.|4), 
there exists a parallax measurement (Benedict et al., 2003) yield- 
ing a distance of 417^ pc and a visual extinction coefficient 
tabulated in column labelled "Others" of Tab.Q] In this case the 
nebula is outside of the sensitivity range of our method and we 
can give only an upper limit to the distance. 

For NGC 6842 (PNG 065.9+00.5, Fig. |4), there is little 
information in the literature. From our own measurement ob- 
tained at the 2.5m Isaac Newton Telescope on La Palma, we 
determine an extinction measurement that is clearly higher than 
that inferred by adopting line fluxes from the Strasbourg catalog. 
Observations imply a distance of 2700+950 pc. The error on the 
distance has been calculated taking into account the fitting cr rf = 
749 pc, the error on the extinction measurement 0.15, and the 
slope of the curve, b -2.6 ■ 10~ 4 pc/mag. 

NGC 6881 (PNG 074.5+02.1, Fig. g) is a quadrupolar 
young nebula (Guerrero & Manchado, 1998) suggested by 
Sabbadin et al. (2005) to have been produced by a massive pro- 
genitor and presently in a similar recombination phase to NGC 
6741 . If so, it is possible that Cp overestimates the interstellar ex- 
tinction and thus the distance using the extinction method, which 
would then be greater than 4000 pc using the very high absorp- 
tion reported in column "Others" (Kaler & Kwitter, 1987), as 
well as the value obtained from the Strasbourg catalog. For this 
reason we do not quote a distance in Tab.[T] 

NGC 6894 (PNG 069.4-02.6, Fig.g) and NGC 7048 (PNG 
088.7-01.6, Fig.|Ul are morphologically simpler. The A v of NGC 
6894 is taken from Ciardullo et al. (1999). The extinction coef- 
ficient determinations for NGC 7048 are more contradictory. By 
adopting the lowest one, we found that this is a nearby nebula 



6 Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

Table 1. Distances inferred for the NGC sample. Columns labelled as "Stras", "Cahn" and "Stas" are referred to the Strasbourg 
catalog, Cahn et al. (1992) and Stasihska et al. (1992), as well as "dC" and "dVst" are referred to Cahn et al. (1992) and van de 
Steene & Zijlstra (1994), respectively, while "dMa" is referred to Maciel (1984). "Other" references are given in the text. When 
significantly different extinction estimates are available, the values reported for the distances are obtained using the absorption 
values in bold face. Errors are the statistical ones coming from the linear fit on the distance extinction curve, except for NGC 6842 
and NGC 7048, where we have also included the errors on the extinction measurement. 



PNG 


Name 






A 


r 






distance [pc] 






Stras. 


Cahn 


Stas. 


this paper 


Others 


dC 


dVst 


dMa 


this paper 


033.8-02.6 


NGC 6741 


1.96 


1.96 


1.93 




1.73 


2047 


2260 


1700 


2680 ± 110 


041.8-02.9 


NGC 6781 




2.09 


1.96 


2.16 ±0.11 


1.78 


699 


840 


900 


< 1000 


045.7-04.5 


NGC 6804 




1.85 




1.85 ±0.11 


1.58 


1709 


1660 


1600 


<800 


046.4-04.1 


NGC 6803 


0.96 


1.62 


1.60 




1.14 


2987 


3190 


2500 


950 ± 130 


060.8-03.6 


NGC 6853 




0.36 






0.55 


262 


400 


400 


<800 


065.9+00.5 


NGC 6842 


0.96 


2.04 




2.08 ± 0.15 




1366 




1700 


2700 ± 950 t 


069.4-02.6 


NGC 6894 




1.80 




1.85 ±0.11 


1.44 


1653 


2000 


1500 


1000 ± 100 


074.5+02.1 


NGC 6881 


3.27 


3.62 






4.12 


2473 


3950 


1700 


n.d. 


084.9-03.4 


NGC 7027 




2.53 




2.97 ± 0.46 




273 


630 


700 


n.d. 


088.7-01.6 


NGC 7048 


0.65 


1.53 




1.20 ± 0.13 


1.27 


1598 


2220 


1200 


1000-2000 t 


089.0+00.3 


NGC 7026 


1.40 


1.34 




2.10 ±0.11 


1.69 


1902 


1940 


900 


< 1500 


107.8+02.3 


NGC 7354 


2.94 


3.62 




3.99 ± 0.08 


3.23 


1271 


1230 


800 


1000 ± 150 



(<1000 pc). However, any distance closer than 1000 pc makes 
the central star absolute magnitude so faint that using a standard 
evolutionary track gives an age of >> 10 5 yrs for the PN, so 
it is likely more distant. Assuming instead the cp obtained by 
our measurement, which agrees with the value in Sabbadin et al. 
(1987) (A v = 1.27), we found a distance between 1000 and 2000 
pc. 

NGC 7027 (PNG 084.9-03.4, Fig.H) is the clearest case pre- 
senting evidence of strong internal absorption, as discussed in 
section [5] Given the difficulty in estimating its exact amount as 
a function of the position at which cp is measured, no extinction 
distance is given in Tab.Q]for this nebula. 

NGC 7026 (PNG 089.0+00.3, Fig. g) is a bipolar nebula 
with a low extinction coefficient. Using any of the extinction val- 
ues in Tab.[TJ we found a distance < 1500 pc. 

Finally, Benetti et al. (2003) propose NGC 7354 (PNG 
107.8+02.3, Fig. H) as a probable recombining nebula in its 
first phase, as derived from a detailed study of NGC 6818. 
Using the Feibelman (2000) extinction data and extrapolating 
the extinction-distance curve to low distances, we found a pos- 
sible distance of about 1000 pc. 



7. Determination of distances for whole sample 

In this section distances are presented for 64 other planetary neb- 
ulae in the area of sky covered by IPHAS. For a further 29 ob- 
jects only a lower limit to the distance can be obtained. For 17 
PNe we found an upper limit, as given in Table [3] We adopt a 
distance upper limit when the measured extinction to the neb- 
ula is smaller than the first point on the corresponding distance- 
extinction curve. A distance lower limit is defined when the vi- 
sual extinction to the nebula lies on the plateau of the interstellar 
extinction curve. For multiple determinations of cp the source of 
the adopted value is reported in bold-face. For upper and lower 
limits, if no indication is given it means that the same conclusion 
holds for all tabulated cp's. The errors on the distances given in 
Tableware the fitting errors <x rf . 

For the 14 PNe listed in Tab.|2l we could not estimate the dis- 
tances because the measured extinction was too far above the in- 
terstellar extinction plateau. According to the discussion of sec- 
tion [24] and the result presented in Fig. [TJ we assume that we 



know op with the uncertainty <x=0.41, which is 0.88 mag in A v , 
for the data extracted from Acker et al. (1992). 



So we consider all PNe with a visual extinction more than 
0.88 magnitude higher than the plateau value to live "above" the 
plateau. Considering these nebulae above the plateau is a zero 
order hypothesis, because the measured extinctions are not a ho- 
mogeneous set of measurements and using a common sigma is 
not rigorous. However, the PNe listed in Table[2]form a sample 
for future detailed studies, to understand whether the discrep- 
ancy with the reddening-distance curve is due to measurement 
errors, or if the nebulae have peculiar physical conditions that 
affect the determination of Cp (e.g. very high densities which 
introduce optical thickness effects), whether they are misclas- 
sified objects (symbiotic stars, nebulae around young stars,etc), 
or whether there is indeed a non negligible amount of reddening 
associated with the PNe themselves and not of interstellar origin. 

The inferred distances are compared in Fig. [6] with those 
of Cahn et al. (1992), based on a modified Shklovsky-Daub 
method, of van de Steene & Zijlstra (1994), based on a correla- 
tion between radio continuum brightness temperature and radius, 
and of Maciel (1984), based on a mass-radius relationship estab- 
lished from selected electron densities and distances. It is inter- 
esting to note that the first two methods seem to provide larger 
distances than our extinction method, while the latter seems to 
provide shorter distances. The spread in these graphs is 4.0 kpc 
(Cahn et al. 1992, 39 objects), 6.6 kpc (van de Steene & Zijlstra 
1994, 23 objects), and 2.5 kpc (Maciel, 1984). It therefore seems 
that the distances found by Maciel better agree with ours than 
those from the other authors. However, the small number of ob- 
jects considered (16 PNe, nine of which are at an estimated dis- 
tance lower than 2 kpc), prevents any conclusion to be drawn 
with the present sample. 

Comparison with other distance scales would be very valu- 
able to better understand the problem. A detailed comparison 
with distance determined via the relation between size and Hq, 
surface brightness (Frew et al., 2006; Frew, 2008) will be pre- 
sented in a future paper, when the global photometric calibration 
of the IPHAS survey becomes available. 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

PNG 033.8-02.6 PNG 041.8-02.9 




1 ^n^ j 


I i 



2.0x10 3 4.0x10 3 6.0x10 3 8.0x10 3 1.0x10 4 1.2x10 4 



1000 



2000 



3000 



4000 



5000 



PNG 045.7-04.5 



3: 



2- 



* 
T + 



L^m 



% 



aW* + 



PNG 046.4-04.1 




1 ^ Hl . 


: 


- + -_ 



1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 



2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 



PNG 060.8-03.6 



PNG 065.9 + 00.5 




2000 



4000 



6000 



8000 




1000 



2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 



Fig. 4. In the figure we present the extinction distance curves for the first 6 nebulae reported in Table Q] The abscissae are in pc, the 
ordinates, in visual magnitudes and the horizontal lines represent the visual extinction corresponding to each nebula, as discussed 
in the text. The short dash-long dash lines represent the 1-cr error associated to our A v measurement presented in Table Q] 



8. Conclusions 

In this paper we have discussed the extinction-distance method 
for determining distances to PNe, motivated by the opportunity 
provided by the IPHAS survey with its wide application in the 
Galaxy. 

The technique is presented and the derivation of the distance 
and its error is put on a formal mathematical basis. We find a 
mean value of the slope b - 6.53 • 1CT 4 mag/pc for the galactic 
extinction distance curve, valid for the analyzed region of the 
sky. 

The numerical and physical reasons that can affect the mea- 
surement of the interstellar extinction toward a PN are then dis- 
cussed. All these, which add to the unavoidable measurement 



errors the effects of an incomplete knowledge of the physics of 
interstellar dust through the Galaxy and inside PNe, have to be 
taken into account every time the method is applied. 

In spite of these uncertainties which will need to be ad- 
dressed in future, we have computed extinction distances for a 
sample of 70 PNe, which is the largest sample of Galactic PNe 
to which the technique has been applied. In the best conditions, 
when the extinction measurements of the PNe are of good qual- 
ity and the lines of sight are well behaved in terms of their as- 
sociated distance-extinction maps, the errors in the PN distances 
can be as good as 20%, which is a very promising result for a 
wider application of the method. Unfortunately this is not the 
common situation for the current data set. As previously men- 
tioned, the uncertainty on the visual extinction for the whole set 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

PNG 069.4-02.6 PNG 074.5 + 02.1 





2000 



4000 



6000 



8000 



1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 



PNG 084.9-03.4 



PNG 088.7-01.6 



5.0 
4.5 
4.0 
3.5 
3.0 
2.5 
2.0 




,w* 



.%tf 



i-H 



**" 



2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 




PNG 089.0 + 00.3 



PNG 107.8 + 02.3 




2000 



4000 



6000 




2000 



3000 



4000 



Fig. 5. Extinction-Distance curves for the second group of six nebulae presented in TableQ] For all graphics the abscissae are in pc, 
the ordinates, in visual magnitudes. The horizontal lines represent the visual extinctions corresponding to the nebulae considered in 
the text. The short dash-long dash lines represent the 1-cr error associated to our A v measurement presented in Table Q] 



of nebulae is <x = 0.88, which implies much larger errors in the 
distances. For a subsample of the PNe considered, extinction is 
more precisely measured, and for the two cases for which we 
could determine the associated error, an uncertainty of 35% on 
the distance is estimated. This can be taken as a figure to be as- 
sociated with PNe for which good spectroscopic data exist. A 
main message of this study is that a careful determination of the 
nebular extinction is mandatory to limit the errors in a way that 
reliable distances can be obtained for individual objects. In this 
respect, our plan is to improve the extinction measurements for 
a significant sample of Galactic PNe. 

We have then compared these new extinction distances with 
other statistical methods. Some of the methods considered (Cahn 
et al. 1992, and van de Steene & Zijlstra 1994) provide distances 



that are generally larger than our determinations, and in general 
the dispersion is quite high. This emphasizes the large 1-cr dis- 
persion in the statistical distances, and the dangers in relying on 
the determination of a statistical distance to a PN without con- 
sidering the particular characteristic of a nebula. 

Concluding, the analysis in this paper demonstrates the in- 
creased potential of the extinction method gained with the avail- 
ability of surveys like IPHAS, which provide precise photomet- 
ric data in large areas of sky. This opens the possibility of mak- 
ing a significant step forward in the calibration of the PN dis- 
tance scale in the Galaxy, and in our understanding of important 
issues such as the properties of the dust distribution within the 
Galactic disc, and the possible importance of dust associated to 
PNe. 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 




Reddening distance from this paper, kpc 




Reddening distance from this paper, kpc 




Reddening distance froi 



Fig. 6. Comparison between the reddening distance and the sta- 
tistical determination. The straight line is the 1:1 locus, the sta- 
tistical distance for the nebulae over the line is bigger than that 
inferred by the extinction. Those PNe for which the difference 
between the two inferred distances is larger than 4 kpc are la- 
beled in the figure. 



Acknowledgements. CG, RLMC, AM, and MSG acknowledge funding from the 
Spanish AYA2007-66804 grant. 



References 

Acker A. 1978, A&AS 33, 367 

Acker A., Marcout J., Ochsenbein R, Stenholm B., Tylenda R. 1992, (SECGPN) 

Strasbourg - ESO catalogue of galactic planetary nebulae, Garching: 

European Southern Observatory. 
Acker A. & Stenholm B. 1987, ESO Messenger 48, 16 
Barlow M. 1983, proc. IAU Symp., 103, 105 
Benedict G. R, McArthur B. E., Fredrick L. W., Harrison T. E. et al. 2003, Apj, 

126, 2549 
Bensby T. & Lundstrom I. 2001, A&A, 374, 599 
Benetti S., Cappellaro E., Ragazzoni R., Sabbadin E, Turatto M. 2003, A&A, 

400, 161 
Bieging H., Boley P. A., Latter W. B., Tielens, A .G. G. M. 2008, Apj, 676, 390 
Bohigas J. 1994, A&A, 288, 617 



Table 2. List of PNe with a reported visual extinction more than 
1 mag larger than the plateau of the corresponding distance- 
extinction curve. The principal source for the Y\J Y\p ratio is the 
ESO/Strasbourg catalog marked as 1 in the column "Reference", 
while the other sources are: 2) Stasihska et al. 1992, 3) Cahn et 
al. 1992, 4) Manchado et al. 1989. f Note: K3-18 is a possible 
symbiotic star. 



PNG 


Name 


A v 


A v Plateau 


Reference 


032.0-03.0 


K3-18f 


5.56 


4.5 


1 


032.9-02.8 


K3-19 


4.49 


3 


1 


048.1+01.1 


K3-29 


6.31 


3.5 


2 


051.0+02.8 


WhMel 


7.60 


5 


1 


054.4-02.5 


Ml -72 


4.80 


2.5 


1.3 


055.2+02.8 


He2-432 


6.32 


4 


1 


059.9+02.0 


K3-39 


5.78 


3.8 


1 


064.9-02.1 


K3-53 


6.25 


3.8 


1 


069.2+02.8 


K3-49 


4.76 


3.4 


1 


072.1+00.1 


K3-57 


4.56 


3 


1 


094.5-00.8 


K3-83 


4.72 


3 


1 


104.1+01.0 


B12-1 


5.76 


4 


1 


110.1+01.9 


PM1-339 


7.35 


6 


4 


112.5+03.7 


K3-88 


5 


4 


1 



Bohigas J. 2001, RMAA, 37, 237 

Bohigas J. 2003, RMxAA, 39, 149 

Bohigas J. 2008, Apj, 674, 954 

Byun Y.-I. 1996, ChJPh, 34, 1113 

Cahn J. H., Kaler J. B. and Stanghellini L. 1992, A&AS 94, 399 

Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C, Mafhis J. S. 1989, Apj, 345, 245 

Christianto H. & Seaquist, E. R. 1998, AJ, 115, 2466 

Ciardullo R., Bond H. E., Sipior M. S., Fullton L. K., Zhang C.-Y., & Schaefer, 

K.G. 1999, AJ, 118, 488 
Corradi, R. M. L. & Schwarz H. E. 1995, A&A, 293, 871 
Cuesta, L., Phillips, J. P., Mampaso, A. 1996, A&A, 313, 243 
Drew J. E., Greimel R., Irwin M. J., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 753 
Feibelman W. 2000, PASP, 112, 861 
Fitzpatrick E. L. 1999, ASP, 63, 75 
Fitzpatrick E. L. 2004, ASPC, 309, 33 
Fitzpatrick E. L. & Massa D. 2007, Apj, 663, 320 
Frew, D.J., 2008, Unpublished PhD thesis, Macquarie University 
Frew, D.J., Parker, Q.A., Russeil, D., 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1081 
Gathier R., Pottasch S. R., and Pel J. W. 1986, A&A, 157, 171 
Girard P., Koppen J., Acker A. 2007, A&A, 463, 265 
Goncalves D. R., Mampaso A., Corradi R. L. M., Quireza, C. 2009, MNRAS, 

398, 2166 
Guerrero M. A. & Manchado A. 1998, Apj, 508 
Hartmann D. T. M., & Thaddeus P. 2001, Apj, 547, 792 
Howarth I. D., 1983, MNRAS, 203, 301 
Kaler J. B. 1983, Apj, 271, 188 
Kaler J. B. & Kwitter K. B. 1987, PASP, 99, 952 
Kaler J. B., Shaw R. A., Kwitter K. B. 1990, Apj, 359, 392 
Keler J. B., Kwitter K. B. , Shaw R. A., Browing L. 1996, PASP, 108, 980 
Kazarian M. A., Parsamian S., Parrao, L. 1998, Astrophys., 41, 239 
Koppen J. 1977, 56,189 

Kwitter K. B. & Jacoby G. H. 1989, AJ, 98, 2159 
Larson K. A. & Whittet D. C. B. 2005, AJ, 623, 897 
Lopez-Martin L., Lopez A., Esteban C, Vazquez R., Raga A., Torrelles J. M., 

Miranda L. F, Meaburn J.; Olguin L. 2002, A&A, 388, 652 
LutzJ. H. 1973, Apj 181, 135 
Maciel W. J. 1984, A&AS, 55, 253 
Manchado A. 2004, ASPC, 313, 3 
Manchado A., Riera A., Mampaso A., Garcia Lario P., Pottasch S. R. 1989, 

RMxAA, 18, 182 
Matsuura, M., Zijlstra, A. A., Gray, M. D., Molster, F. J., Waters, L. B. F. M. 

2005a, MNRAS, 363, 628 
Matsuura, M., Zijlstra, A. A., Molster, F. J., Waters, L. B. F. M., Nomura, H., 

Sahai, R., Hoare, M. G. 2005b, MNRAS, 359, 383 
Mavromatakis F, Papamastorakis J., Paleologou E. V. 2001, A&A, 374, 280 
Monteiro H., Schwarz H. E., Gruenwald R., Guenthner K, Heathcote S. R. 2005, 

ApJ, 620, 321 
O'Dell C. R., Balick B., Hajiam A. R., Henney W. J., Burkert A. 2003, RMAA, 

15,29 



10 Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

Osterbrock D. E. 1974, PASP, 86, 609 

Osterbrock D. E. 2005, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nu- 
clei, University Science Books, p. 73 
Peimbert & Torres-Peimbert 1987, RMAA, 15,117 
Pefia M. 2005, RMxAA , 41, 423 
Pefia M., Stasinska G., Medina S. 2001, A&A 367 983 
Phillips J. P., Cuesta L., Kemp S. N. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 548 
Pollacco D. L. & Ramsay G. 1992, MNRAS, 254, 228 
Ramos-Larios G., Phillips J.P; Cuesta L. 2008, MNRAS 391 52 
Rodgers A. W., Conroy P., Bloxham G. 1988, PASP.100, 626 
Rodriguez M., Corradi R. L. M., Mampaso A. 2001 A&A 377, 1042 
Rudy R. J. , Rossano G. S. , Erwin P. , Puetter R. C. , Feibelman W. A 1993, AJ, 

105, 1002 
Ruffle, P. M. E., Zijlstra, A. A., Walsh, J. R., Gray, M. D., Gesicki, K., Minniti, 

D., Comeron, E, 2004, MNRAS, 353, 796 
Sabbadin E, Benetti S., Cappellaro E., Ragazzoni R. and Turatto M 2005, A&A, 

436, 459 
Sabbadin, E, Cappellaro, E., Turatto, M. 1987, A&AJ82, 305 
Sale S. E., Drew J. E., Unruh Y. C. et al. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 497 
Schwarz H. E., Monteiro H., 2006, ApJ, 648, 430 
Seaton, M. J. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 73 
Shen Z.-X., Liu X.-W., Danziger I. J. 2004, A&A, 422, 563 
Speck, A. K., Meixner, M., Fong, D., McCullough, P. R., Moser, D. E., Ueta, T. 

2002, AJ, 123, 346 
Stasinska G., Tylenda R., Acker A., Stenholm B. 1992, A&A , 266, 486 
Stenholm B. & Acker A. 1987, Proc Frascati Workshop Planetary and Proto- 

planetary Nebulae from IRAS to ISO, Praite-Martinez ed., p. 25 
Tylenda R., Acker A., Stenholm B. and Koppen J. 1992, A&AS, 95, 337 
Udalski A., 2003, ApJ, 590, 284 

van de Steene G V. & Zijlstra A. A. 1994, A&A, 108, 485 
van de Steene G C, Jacoby G H., Pottasch S. R. 1996, A&AS 1 18, 243 
Warner, J. W.; Rubin, V. C 1975, ApJ, 198, 593 
Wesson R., Liu X.-W., Barlow M. J. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 424 
Whitford A. E., 1958, Aj, 63, 201 

Wright A., Corradi R. L. M., Perinotto M., 2005, A&A, 436, 967 
Woodward, C. E., Pipher, J. L., Forrest, W. J., Moneti, A., & Shure, M. A. 1992, 

ApJ, 385, 567 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 

Table 3. Distance to the whole sample of PNe (except the NGC objects listed in 
the TableQ~]and the objects listed in Table|2]l. The columns numbered from 1 to 3 
give the values of Cp inferred from H„ and Hg supplied to the Strasbourg catalog 
(1), from Cahn et al. (1992) (2), from Stasihska et al. (1992) (3). The extinctions 
obtained in this paper are given in column 4. In column 5 we present the values 
obtained in other papers, the corresponding references are listed at the end of the 
table, and the corresponding sequential numbers are shown in column "key". The 
values adopted in order to obtain the distances are marked in bold-face. If for a 
PNe no value is shown in bold-face, it means that we find the same results with 
all of them. Our distance are compared with those obtained by Cahn et al. (1992), 
van de Steene & Zijlstra (1994) and Maciel (1984). 



11 



PNG 


Name 




Cfi 






distance [pc] 




key 






Stras. 


Cahn Stas. 


this p. Other 


Cahn 


Vst. 


Ma. 


THIS 








(1) 


(2) (3) 


(4) (5) 








PAPER 














031.7+01.7 


PC20 


2.51 




3.04 








>1100 




032.5-03.2 


K3-20 


1.88 












>1100 




032.7-02.0 


Ml -66 


1.39 




1.44 


3439 


5000 




>3000 




033.2-01.9 


Sa3-151 






1.52 








3500 ± 300 




035.9-01.1 


Sh2-71 


1.65 


1.38 


1.18 


997 






<1000 




038.7-03.3 


Ml -69 


1.32 












3300 ± 500 




040.4-03.1 


K3-30 


1.67 


1 .66 




6291 


6550 




>3000 




041.2-00.6 


HaTrl4 


0.56 












<1000 




041.8+04.4 


K3-15 


1.28 












>6000 




043.0-03.0 


M4-14 


1.42 






6692 


7570 


1600 


2600 ± 300 




043.1+03.8 


Ml -65 


1.24 


1.23 




6536 


6280 




3200 ± 900 




043.3+02.2 


PM1-276 






1.74 








1350 ± 100 


1 


045.4-02.7 


Vy2-2 


1.94 


1.71 




2159 






2300 ± 170 




046.3-03.1 


PB9 


1.81 






4661 


3990 




3800 ± 450 




047.1+04.1 


K3-21 


1.15 










10500 


2700 ± 366 




047.1-04.2 


A62 




2.07 


0.18 


494 




1100 


<900 


2 


048.0-02.3 


PB10 


2.01 






4685 


3830 




>2000 




048.5+04.2 


K4-16 


1.51 


1.50 




15127 






>5000 




048.7+01.9 


He2-429 


2.12 




1.87 


3383 






1500 ± 600 


3 


049.4+02.4 


He2-428 


1.23 




1.14 








1000 ± 100 


7 


050.1+03.3 


Ml -67 


1.07 






682 




1000 


800 ± 100 




051.0+03.0 


He2-430 


2.22 


2.21 




3972 






>3000 




051.0-04.5 


PC22 


0.58 












4000 ± 500 




051.9-03.8 


Ml-73 


0.88 




0.95 


4669 


4400 




2900 ± 500 


4 


052.2-04.0 


Ml -74 


0.94 


1.01 0.98 




4118 


8640 




5300 ± 1000 




052.5-02.9 


Mel-1 


0.05 


0.72 0.46 


0.58 


4618 






<1000 


5 


052.9+02.7 


K3-31 


2.32 






3941 


6880 




800 ± 700 




052.9-02.7 


K3-41 


1.13 






20464 


28690 




3200 ± 500 




053.3+03.0 


A59 




1.77 


1.61 


1412 




1800 


<1000 




053.8-03.0 


A63 


1.12 




1.09 






2700 


>8000 




055.1-01.8 


K3-43 


1.66 










1500 


>2800 




055.3+02.7 


Hell 


2.06 












2500 ± 1000 




055.5-00.5 


Ml-71 


1.82 


1.80 


2.06 








2900 ± 400 


6 


055.6+02.1 


He 1-2 


1.86 












>3000 




056.0+02.0 


K3-35 


2.01 






3975 


6580 




<1000 




057.9-01.5 


He2-447 


2.18 






2874 






>2000 




058.9+01.3 


K3-40 


1.72 






7068 


6490 




>3000 




059.0+04.6 


K3-34 


0.35 










5700 


<1000 




059.0-01.7 


He 1-3 


1.67 












1000 ± 200 




059.4+02.3 


K3-37 


1.77 






7148 


7910 




2400 ± 400 




060.5-00.3 


K3-45 


0.84 










1900 


<1000 




060.5+01.8 


He2-440 


2.94 






3962 






>4000 




061.3+03.6 


He2-437 


1.45 




0.88 








1100 ±300 


7 


062.4-00.2 


M2-48 


2.02 




1.35 


6970 




1600 


900 ± 200 


8 


067.9-00.2 


K3-52 


1.49 






2459 


7200 




2300 ± 200 




068.6+01.1 


He 1-4 


1.77 




1.44 








>5000 




068.7+01.9 


K4-41 


1.50 






7929 


7820 




>4000 




068.7+03.0 


PC23 


1.53 






6680 


7740 




>4000 




068.8-00.0 


Ml-75 






2.11 


3190 




3100 


>4000 




069.2+03.8 


K3-46 


0.69 










3200 


1600 ± 100 




069.6-03.9 


K3-58 


1.34 






5635 




5700 


>3000 




071.6-02.3 


M3-35 


2.07 


2.41 




1760 


4840 




2150 ± 150 




075.6+04.3 


Anon.20h02 


0.01 




0.85 








7000 ± 1300 




076.3+01.1 


A69 




4.35 




4173 




300 


>4000 




076.4+01.8 


KjPn3 


0.93 












2000 ± 100 




077.5+03.7 


KjPnl 


1.54 












>5500 




077.7+03.1 


KjPn2 


1.52 












3700 ± 400 




078.9+00.7 


Sdl 


0.11 




0.11 








<1200 


9 


084.2-04.2 


K3-80 


1.18 












900 ± 100 




084.9+04.4 


A71 




1.06 




722 




900 


2800 ± 400 




088.7+04.6 


K3-78 


0.35 






7831 


7290 




<1200 




089.3-02.2 


Ml -77 


1.23 






5496 


4880 


700 


2000 ± 250 




089.8-00.6 


Shi -89 


0.99 


0.82 




1941 






1350 ± 200 




091.6-04.8 


K3-84 


0.51 












5200 ± 900 




093.3-00.9 


K3-82 


0.96 






2675 


3250 




900 ± 130 




093.3-02.4 


Ml -79 


0.13 


0.78 0.77 




2627 


3610 


1000 


4700 ± 800 




093.5+01.4 


Ml -78 


3.02 


2.65 




700 




3100 


>2200 




095.1-02.0 


M2-49 


1.17 






2870 


6140 




>2300 




095.2+00.7 


K3-62 


2.54 






2270 


4050 




>2500 





continued on next page 



12 



Distances of Planetary Nebulae: IPHAS extinction distances to Planetary Nebulae 
Table 3. Continued 



PNG 


Name 


Stras. 


Cahn 


Stas. 


this p. 


Other 


Cahn 


Vst. 


Ma. 


this p. 


key 






(1) 


(2) 


(3) 


(4) 


(5) 








PAPER 














096.3+02.3 


K3-61 


1.32 










7334 


6510 


1100 


1000 ± 200 




097.6-02.4 


M2-50 


0.95 


0.63 


0.61 






10028 


9280 


1500 


2700 ± 500 




098.1+02.4 


K3-63 


1.18 


0.99 








5780 




1700 


1400 ± 130 




098.2+04.9 


K3-60 


2.27 


1.90 


2.59 






3887 


6210 




2000 ± 200 




102.9-02.3 


A79 




1.33 




0.81 


0.36 


1784 




1300 


1000 ± 160 


7 


103.7+00.4 


M2-52 


1.72 






1.44 




4411 




1500 


4000 ± 360 




104.4-01.6 


M2-53 


0.52 


1.26 




1.06 


0.73 


3737 


4940 


900 


1900 ± 400 




107.4-00.6 


K4-57 


1.32 
















4000 ± 1000 




107.4-02.6 


K3-87f 


1.14 










9203 


9680 




4400 ± 800 




107.7-02.2 


Ml-80 


0.52 










5496 


4880 


1600 


1500 ± 200 




111.8-02.8 


Hbl2 






1.35 




0.60 








<1000 


11 


112.5-00.1 


KjPn8 


0.67 








0.42 








1400 ± 100 


17 


114.0-04.6 


A82 




0.75 








1868 




2000 


3150 ±500 




119.3+00.3 


BV5-1 


1.05 




1.31 


1.01 


0.82 








3000 ± 400 


12 


122.1-04.9 


A2 


0.76 


0.56 


0.34 


0.80 




3929 




3000 


1500 ± 150 




126.3+02.9 


K3-90 


0.83 


0.97 








5759 


5600 




<1000 




128.0-04.1 


Simeiz22 










0.34 








<1000 


13 


130.2+01.3 


IC1747 


1.48 


0.74 




1.03 




2937 


2420 




1300 ± 200 




130.4+03.1 


K3-92 


1.96 


1.30 




1.23 




6806 






3100 ± 900 




131.5+02.6 


A3 




1.23 


1.22 


1.33 


1.23 


2560 






5100 ±500 


14 


132.4+04.7 


K3-93 


1.35 






1.94 










<1000 




136.1+04.9 


A6 




1.39 






1.39 


958 


2240 




<1000 




138.8+02.8 


IC289 


1.03 


1.09 




1.16 




1434 


1480 




>8000 




142.1+03.4 


K3-94 


0.91 








0.52 


6507 


7740 




<1000 


15 


147.4-02.3 


Ml-4 


2.47 


1.84 


1.62 






2988 


3390 




3300 ± 350 




147.8+04.1 


M2-2 


1.34 


1.50 


1.50 






4356 


3880 




>2000 




151.4+00.5 


K3-64 


0.73 
















1800 ±200 




153.7-01.4 


K3-65 


1.83 










10512 






3700 ± 300 




160.5-00.5 


We 1-2 










1.44 








2500 ± 180 


16 


163.1-00.8 


We 1-3 










0.70 








2700 ± 300 


16 


167.0-00.9 


A8 




1.77 






0.68 


1633 






5500 ± 1000 


2 


170.7+04.6 


K3-69 


1.34 










7946 




17850 


>6000 




178.3-02.5 


K3-68 


0.80 










5945 






2200 ± 240 


16 


181.5+00.9 


Pul 










1.03 








7000 ± 800 




184.0-02.1 


Ml-5 




1.39 


1.38 






2922 


4940 




>4000 




184.6+00.6 


K3-70 


1.55 










12117 






>6000 




184.8+04.4 


K3-71 


1.14 
















2500 ± 1000 




194.2+02.5 


J900 


0.56 


0.64 


0.63 






2756 


3270 




4300 ± 650 




197.8-03.3 


A14 




1.18 




1.52 


0.85 


3317 






5400 ± 800 


10 


201.9-04.6 


We 1-4 










0.85 








3000 ± 1100 


15 


204.8-03.5 


K3-72 










1.06 


5119 






>4000 


15 


211.2-03.5 


Ml-6 


1.84 


1.17 


1.83 






2648 


4290 




2000 ± 160 





key: 1) van de Steene et al. 1996; 2) Phillips et al. 2005; 3) Girard et al. 2007; 4) Wesson et al. 2005; 5) Shen et al. 2004; 6) Wright et al. 2005; 7) Rodriguez et al. 2001; 8) Lopez-Martin 
et al. 2002; 9) Kazarian et al. 1998; 10) Bohigas 2003; 1 1) Rudy et al. 1993; 12) Bohigas 2008; 13) Kwitter & Jacoby 1989; 14) Kaler 1983; 15) Bohigas 2001; 16) Kaler et al. 1990; 17) 

Goncalves et al. 2009. 

f Note: K3-87 is a possible symbiotic.