Skip to main content

Full text of "Quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surfaces of the heavy-fermion superconductor Ce$_2$PdIn$_8$"

See other formats


arXiv:1509.02657vl [cond-mat.str-el] 9 Sep 2015 


Quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surfaces of the heavy-fermion superconductor Ce2PdIn8 

K. Gotze/ J. Klotz,^ D. Gnida,^ H. Harima,^ D. A. Demuer,® 

S. Elgazzar/ J. Wosnitza/ D. Kaczorowski,^ and 1. Sheikin®’0 

^ Hochfeld-Magnetlabor Dresden (HLD-EMFL), Helmholtz-Zentrum 
Dresden-Rossendorf and TU Dresden, D-01314 Dresden, Germany 
^Institute of Low Temperature and Structure Research, 

Polish Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box I 4 IO, PL-50-950 Wroclaw, Poland 
^Graduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan 
'^IMR, Tohoku University, Oarai, Ibaraki 311-1313, Japan 
^INAG/SPSMS, GEA Grenoble, 38054 Grenoble, France 
^Laboratoire National des Champs Magnetiques Intenses (LNCMI-EMFL), CNRS, UJF, 38042 Grenoble, France 
^Highly Correlated Matter Research Group, Department of Physics, 

University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park 2006, South Africa 
(Dated: September 10, 2015) 

We report low-temperature de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) effect measurements in magnetic fields up 
to 35 T of the heavy-fermion superconductor Ce 2 PdIng. The comparison of the experimental results 
with band-structure calculations implies that the 4/ electrons are itinerant rather than localized. 

The cyclotron masses estimated at high field are only moderately enhanced, 8 and 14 mo, but are 
substantially larger than the corresponding band masses. The observed angular dependence of the 
dHvA frequencies suggests quasi-two-dimensional Fermi surfaces in agreement with band-structure 
calculations. However, the deviation from ideal two dimensionality is larger than in CeCoIns, 
with which Ce 2 PdIn 8 bears a lot of similarities. This subtle distinction accounts for the different 
superconducting critical temperatures of the two compounds. 

PACS numbers: 71.18.-|-y,71.27.-|-a,74.70.Tx 


The appearance of unconventional superconductivity 
in the vicinity of a quantum critical point (QCP) is 
a common trend in Ge-based heavy-fermion (HF) com¬ 
pounds. A more recent and still somewhat controversial 
issue is the influence of the Fermi-surface (FS) dimen¬ 
sionality on unconventional superconductivity. Indeed, 
reduced dimensionality of the FS leads to nesting-type 
magnetic instabilities [l| and thus enhances the supercon¬ 
ductivity ii- The exact knowledge of the FS topology 
of HF systems is, therefore, essential. In addition, this 
information allows distinguishing if the / electrons are 
itinerant or localized, i.e. whether they contribute to the 
FS or not. 


Ce 2 PdIn 8 is a recently discovered HF superconductor 
with Tc = 0.7 K and a non-magnetic ground state Si- 
Non-Fermi-liquid behavior was observed in both macro¬ 
scopic and microscopic 0[ll measurements at 

low temperature, implying that Ce 2 PdIn 8 is located very 
close to a QGP. It was further suggested that a two- 
dimensional (2D) SDW-type QCP is induced by m^- 
netic field near the upper critical field, Hc 2 ss 2 T [9|. 
Unconventional superconductivity was demonstrated to 
be due to antiferromagnetic quantum fluctuations [II- 
These unusual properties are strikingly similar to those 
of the well-studied HF superconductor CeCoIns [I4l4l7l| . 
which is also located very close to a QCP at ambient 
pressure. However, the superconducting critical temper¬ 
ature Tc = 2.3 K of CeCoIns [l^ is considerably higher 
than that of Ce 2 PdIn 8 . 

Ce 2 PdIn 8 crystallizes into a tetragonal Ho 2 CoGa 8 - 


type crystal structure with space group PA/mmm. It 
belongs to the larger family of Ce„TIn 3„+2 {T: transi¬ 
tion metal, n = 1, 2, and 00 ) systems, containing a se¬ 
quence of n Celns layers intercalated by a TIn 2 layer 
along the c axis. While cubic Celna (n = 00 ) is a 
completely isotropic system, the layered structures with 
n = 1 and 2 are expected to lead to anisotropic prop¬ 
erties and quasi-2D FSs. Indeed, quasi-2D FS sheets 
were observed in both n = 1 systems CeCoIns [11113, 
Celrins flijl. C eRhln.^ [ 2 I [23j | and the n = 2 compound 
Ce9RhIns |24 HI. The degree of two dimensionality is 
expected to be larger in monolayer systems with alter¬ 
nating layers of Celna and TIn 2 than in their bilayer 
counterparts, in which two Celna layers are separated by 
one TIn 2 layer. 


In this paper, we report high-held dHvA measurements 
of Ce 2 PdIn 8 . The observed FS is quasi-2D, however, we 
hnd that the more three-dimensional crystal structure 
of Ce 2 PdIn 8 relative to CeCoIns leads to a reduced two 
dimensionality of the FS topology. We argue that this 
can explain the difference in the superconducting critical 
temperatures of the two compounds. 

Single crystals were grown by the self-hux method Q] , 
and we have conhrmed by specihc-heat measurements 
that they are not contaminated by Celna. The dHvA 
measurements were performed using a torque cantilever 
magnetometer mounted in a top-loading dilution refriger¬ 
ator equipped with a low-temperature rotator. Magnetic 
helds, B, up to 35 T generated by LNCMI-Grenoble re¬ 
sistive magnets were applied at different angles between 






2 


the [001] and [100] directions. 



FIG. 1. Fourier spectrum of the high-held dHvA oscillations 
(inset) in Ce 2 PdIn 8 for magnetic held applied at 4° off the c 
axis at 30 mK. 


Figure [T] shows the oscillatory torque after subtract¬ 
ing a non-oscillating background and the corresponding 
Fourier transform in Ce 2 PdIn 8 . Four fundamental fre¬ 
quencies, denoted C; Vj crii ^-nd a 2 , are observed when 
B is applied close to the c axis. The oscillations were 
traced up to 60°, where their amplitude decreased below 
the noise level. 

To figure out whether the / electrons are itinerant or 
localized in Ce 2 PdIng, we performed band-structure cal¬ 
culations for both Ce 2 PdIn 8 and La 2 PdIn 8 , the latter 
corresponding to the Ce compound with localized / elec¬ 
trons. For both compounds, the calculations were car¬ 
ried out using a full potential augmented plane wave 
method with the local density approximation (LDA) 
for the exchange-correlation potential. As crystals of 
La 2 PdIn 8 are currently unavailable, the lattice parame¬ 
ters of Ce 2 PdIn 8 were used for the La 2 PdIn 8 calculations. 
The resulting FSs are shown in Fig. [2j 

Given the layered crystal structure, it is not surpris¬ 
ing that some of the calculated FS sheets are quasi-2D 
in both Ce 2 PdIn 8 and La 2 PdIn 8 . The details of the FSs 
are, however, clearly different. In contrast, the topol¬ 
ogy of the 4/-itinerant FS of CeCoIng is similar to the 
4/-localized FS of LaRhlng and CeRhIns 22, 23|, where 
the two FSs differ mainly by size. It should be noted 
that CeCoIns is a compensated metal with equal car¬ 
rier numbers of electrons and holes, while LaCoIus is 
an uncompensated metal. On the other hand, both 
Ce 2 PdIn 8 and La 2 PdIn 8 are compensated metals. As 
seen in Fig.[5J the charge-carrier number given by the FS 
volume in Ce 2 PdIn 8 is about two times smaller than that 
in La 2 PdIn 8 . 

Figure [3l[a) shows the experimentally observed angu¬ 
lar dependence of the dHvA frequencies in Ce 2 PdIn 8 
together with the results of band-structure calculations 
based on the 4/-itinerant band model. Experimental and 
calculated frequencies and effective masses are also shown 


Branch 

Experiment 

F (kT) m* jm^ 

Calculation 

F (kT) mbimo 

7 

— 

— 

0.34 

1.55 

5 

— 

— 

0.43 

0.42 

c 

0.78 

8.4±0.4 

0.69 

1.24 

n 

1.2 

— 

1.07 

2.27 

(y.2 

3.26 

— 

2.82 

0.81 


4.82 

14±1 

4.82 

2.12 

P2 

— 

— 

7.27 

2.81 

bi 

— 

— 

13.08 

5.2 


^ The effective masses were measured with magnetic field applied 
at 4° off the c axis 

TABLE 1. Experimental and calculated dHvA frequencies and 
effective masses in Ce 2 PdIn 8 for magnetic field along the c 
axis. 


in Table ID The agreement between the experimentally 
observed a branches and those of the calculations is ex¬ 
cellent. Not only the angular dependences are the same, 
but even the absolute values agree very well. This implies 
that both the topology and the size of the calculated FS 
sheet reproduce the experimental results exceptionally 
well. The a branches correspond to the quasi-2D FS of 
the band 73, as shown in Fig. [H Regarding the mea¬ 
sured lower (< 2 kT) dHvA frequencies, there is also a 
very good agreement between the experimental and cal¬ 
culated branches. These branches originate mostly from 
rather isotropic parts of the FS in band 72. The cal¬ 
culated /3 branches originating from complicated sheets 
in band 72 were, however, not observed in the experi¬ 
ment. This is probably caused by a strongly enhanced 
effective mass or an unfavorable curvature factor for de¬ 
tecting the dHvA signal. For comparison, in Fig. |31[b) 
we plot the experimental results obtained in Ce 2 PdIn 8 
together with band-structure calculations for La 2 PdIn 8 . 
In this case, the two are obviously at odds with each 
other. In particular, only one quasi-2D FS was observed 
in the experiment, while the calculations predict two of 
them for La 2 PdIn 8 , which should be easy to detect. 

The comparison of the experimentally observed dHvA 
frequencies with the results of the LDA band-structure 
calculations thus gives clear evidence for a quasi-2D FS 
with itinerant / electrons in Ce^P dlns . The same con¬ 
clusion was drawn for CeCoIns [13, l20| . 

We, alternatively, calculated the band structure using 
the local spin density approximation with the relativis¬ 
tic version of the full-potential local orbital method 261 
for Ce 2 PdIn 8 . This also suggests quasi-2D FS, but the 
agreement with the experimental results is not as good. 

The effective masses shown in Table |D were determined 
by fitting the temperature dependence of the oscilla¬ 
tory amplitude by the standard Lifshitz-Kosevich for¬ 
mula [27|. This was done for the magnetic field applied 
at 4° off the c axis. Due to the small amplitudes of the 





























3 



FIG. 2. Calculated FSs of Ce 2 PdIn 8 (left). Calculated FSs of La 2 PdIn 8 (right) are also shown for comparison. 


oscillations the field range from 28 to 34.5 T was used 
for the analysis. Even for such high fields, the effective 
masses of only two branches, ( and ai, could be reliably 
determined. The obtained values are 8.4±0.4 and 14±1 
mo, respectively. The effective mass of the q.\ branch cor¬ 
responding to the quasi-2D sheet of the FS is comparable 
to the values, 8 - 18 mg, reported for the quasi-2D FS of 
CeCoIns [l^l^[2^. This implies a similar degree of hy¬ 
bridization between the / and conduction electrons. The 
detected effective masses are, however, by far too small 
to account for the huge value of the electronic specific 
heat coefficient, 7 , of the order of 1 ^K^mol just above 
the superconducting transition iii- Presumably, the 
effective masses of the /3 branches, which are not ob¬ 
served here, are strongly enhanced. Indeed, already the 
calculated band masses of the /3 branches are higher than 
those of the other branches (see Table H]). On the other 
hand, the Sommerfeld coefficient of Ce 2 PdIn 8 is similar 
to that of CeCoIns [l^, where the effective masses were 
reported to strongly decrease with magnetic field 0 - 
While the observed dHvA oscillations in Ce 2 PdIn 8 are 
not strong enough to perform the field-dependent anal¬ 
ysis of the effective masses, they can also be expected 
to decrease with magnetic field. This assumption is sup¬ 
ported by the experimentally observed field dependence 
of the T^-coefficient in the resistivity 0 and of the Som¬ 
merfeld coefficient of the specific heat 9| above the upper 
critical field. 

As shown in Fig. 21 the major FS sheets of both 
Ce 2 PdIn 8 and CeCoIns are quasi-2D corrugated cylin¬ 


ders extending along the [001] direction. As many of the 
physical properties of HF materials strongly depend on 
the FS dimensionality, the key question here is which 
FS is more 2D, i.e. which amplitude of the corrugation 
is smaller. For both Ce 2 PdIn 8 and CeCoIns, the FSs 
experimentally determined through dHvA measurements 
are in excellent agreement with calculated ones. This is, 
however, not always the case. That is why we introduce a 
quantitative criterion of a quasi-2D FS deviation from an 
ideal cylinder: A = (S^ax - Srain)IS, where S^ax and 
Smin are the maximum and minimum extremal cross- 
sections respectively, and S is the average cross-section 
of the warped cylinder. For an ideal cylinder, A = 0. 
Since the extremal cross-sections, S'i, of the FS are pro¬ 
portional to the dHvA frequencies, F), S can be replaced 
by F measured with field along [001] to determine A 
experimentally. In Ce 2 PdIn 8 , with the two frequencies, 
a\ and a-i, listed in Table [H this yields A = 0.386. The 
dHvA effect measurements in CeCoIns revealed three ex¬ 
tremal cross-section of the quasi-2D FS 0,0,0 . The 
reported values of the dHvA frequencies are slightly dif¬ 
ferent, yielding the average value of A = 0.221. This 
implies that the deviation from the ideal 2D FS is much 
smaller in CeCoIns than in Ce 2 PdIn 8 . This is expected 
as well from the more 3D crystal structure of Ce 2 PdIn 8 
as compared to CeCoIns. 

The corresponding larger anisotropy of CeCoIns as 
compared to Ce 2 PdIn 8 accounts for the higher supercon¬ 
ducting critical temperature of CeCoIns. In fact, 2.3 K in 
CeCoIns is the highest among all the known Ce-based 














































































4 




Field angle (deg.) 


FIG. 3. (color online) Angular dependence of the experimentally observed dHvA frequencies in Ce 2 PdIng (big open circles) is 
shown together with the results of band-structure calculations (small closed circles) performed for Ce 2 PdIng (a) and La 2 PdIng 
(b). The latter correspond to Ce 2 PdIng with localized 4/ electrons and are shown for comparison. Very low calculated dHvA 
frequencies that correspond to small FS pockets are not shown for clarity. 


HF materials. Remarkably, the FS of CeCoIns is the 
most 2D like as compared to its Ir and Rh analogs (^ . 
The FS of CeRhInsjhowever, changes at its critical pres¬ 
sure Pc — 2.4 GPa [29|, and the reported dHvA frequen¬ 
cies yield A = 0.17 above Pc- This value is similar to 
that of CeCoIns at ambient pressure. In CeRhIns, super¬ 
conductivity emerges around Pc, where Pc = 2.1 K [30j, 
a value close to that of CeCoIns. Regar ding Celrins, 
experimentally observed dHvA frequencies |2l| result in 
A = 0.269, a value in between those for CeCoIm and 
Ce 2 PdIn 8 . However, Tc = 0.4 K of Celrins 31| can 
not be compared directly to the critical temperatures 
of CeCoIus and Ce^Pdlug, as Celrins is located further 
away from a QCP [S^- When Celrins is tuned to a QCP 
by Rh substitution, Tc increases to about 1 K [s^, and 
is likely to be reduced due to disorder as compared to 
pure compounds. Consistently with A, this value also 
falls in between those for CeCoIns and Ce 2 PdIn 8 . Un¬ 
fortunately, there is currently no information about the 
FS of Rh-substituted Celrins. While the FS dimension¬ 
ality is not the only factor that determines Tc in HF 
superconductors, it is certainly a significant one. Indeed, 
Tc = 18.5 K was reported for PuCoGas [s^, which is the 
highest among those yet observed in /-electron materi¬ 
als. Remarkably, the calculated FS of PuCoGas consists 
of three corrugated cylinders , although the degree of 
corrugation is relatively high with A being 0.448, 0.359 
and 0.66 respectively. However, the results of these cal¬ 


culations are still to be confirmed experimentally. 

In summary, our high-held dHvA investigation of 
Ce 2 PdIn 8 combined with band-structure calculations ev¬ 
idence the existence of s quasi-2D FS with itinerant /- 
electrons in this compound. The comparison of the FS 
topology of Ce 2 PdIn 8 and CeCoIns implies that the FS 
of the latter compound is much closer to an ideal cylinder 
characteristic for a 2D case. The difference in the FS di¬ 
mensionality accounts for different superconducting crit¬ 
ical temperatures of the two compounds, which are both 
located in close vicinity to a QCP and have a similar 
degree of hybridization between the 4/ and conduction 
electrons. It would be interesting to apply the quantita¬ 
tive criterion of the FS two dimensionality we introduced 
here to other HF materials with quasi-2D FS. In particu¬ 
lar, the criterion can be used to verify the theoretical pre¬ 
diction about the influence of the FS dimensionality on 
the type of quantum criticality in HF compounds . 

Another interesting question is whether magnetic fields 
themselves affect the FS dimensionality in Ce 2 PdIn 8 in 
particular and other quasi-2D HF materials in general. 
Zero-held ARPES measurements in Ce 2 PdIn 8 would be 
very useful to address this issue. 

We are grateful to T. Maehira for sharing with us the 
details of the band-structure calculations in PuCoGas. 
KG acknowledges support from the DFG within GRK 
1621. We acknowledge the support of the HLD-HZDR 
and the LNCMI-CNRS, members of the European Mag- 
















5 



Ce2PdIng 



FIG. 4. Comparison of the calculated quasi-2D FSs of 
CeCoIns and Ce 2 PdIng. 


netic Field Laboratory (EMFL). 


and K. Ueda, 
G. Lonzarich, 


* ilya.sheikin@lncmi.cnrs.fr 

[1] T. Moriya, Y. Takahashi, 

J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59, 2905 (1990) 

[2] P. Monthoux and G. 

Phys. Rev. B 59, 14598 (1999) 

[3] P. Monthoux, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 15, S1973 (2003) 

[4] D. Kaczorowski, A. P. Pikul, D. Gnida, and V. H. Tran, 
Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 027003 (2009) 

and V. Tran, 



T. Y. Guan, S. Y. Zhou, D. Gnida, D. Kaczorowski, and 
S. Y. Li, Phys. Rev. X 1, 011010 (2011) 

[7] V. H. Tran, D. Kaczorowski, R. T. Khan, and E. Bauer, 
Phys. Rev. B 83, 064504 (2011) 

[8] D. Gnida, M. Matusiak, and D. Kaczorowski, 
Phys. Rev. B 85, 060508 (2012) 


[9] Y. Tokiwa, P. Gegenwart, D. Gnida, and D. Kac¬ 
zorowski, Phys. Rev. B 84, 140507 (2011) 

[10] M. Matusiak, D. Gnida, and D. Kaczorowski, 

Phys. Rev. B 84, 115110 (2011) 

[11] H. Fukazawa, R. Nagashima, S. Shimatani, Y. Kohori, 
and D. Kaczorowski, Phys. Rev. B 86, 094508 (2012) 

[12] V. H. Tran, A. D. Hillier, D. T. Adroja, and D. Kac¬ 
zorowski, Phys. Rev. B 86, 094525 (2012) 

[13] K. Hashimoto, Y. Mizukami, R. Katsumata, 
H. Shishido, M. Yamashita, H. Ikeda, Y. Mat- 
suda, J. A. Schlueter, J. D. Fletcher, A. Carring¬ 


ton, D. Gnida, D. Kaczorowski, and T. Shibauchi, 
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3293 (2013) 

[14] J. Paglione, M. A. Tanatar, D. G. Hawthorn, 
E. Boaknin, R. W. Hill, F. Ronning, M. Suther¬ 
land, L. Taillefer, C. Petrovic, and P. C. Canfield, 
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246405 (2003) 

[15] A. Bianchi, R. Movshovich, I. Vekhter, P. G. Pagliuso, 
and J. L. Sarrao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 257001 (2003) 

[16] E. D. Bauer, C. Capan, F. Ronning, 

R. Movshovich, J. D. Thompson, and J. L. Sar¬ 
rao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 047001 (2005) 

[17] F. Ronning, C. Capan, E. D. Bauer, J. D. 
Thompson, J. L. Sarrao, and R. Movshovich, 
Phys. Rev. B 73, 064519 (2006) 

[18] C. Petrovic, P. G. Pagliuso, M. F. Hund¬ 

ley, R. Movshovich, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. 
Thompson, Z. Fisk, and P. Monthoux, 

J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, L337 (2001) 

[19] R. Settai, H. Shishido, S. Ikeda, Y. Murakawa, 
M. Nakashima, D. Aoki, Y. Haga, H. Harima, and 
Y. Onuki, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, L627 (2001) 

[20] D. Hall, E. C. Palm, T. P. Murphy, S. W. Tozer, Z. Fisk, 
U. Alver, R. G. Goodrich, J. L. Sarrao, P. G. Pagliuso, 
and T. Ebihara, Phys. Rev. B 64, 212508 (2001) 

[21] Y. Haga, Y. Inada, H. Harima, K. Oikawa, 

M. Murakawa, H. Nakawaki, Y. Tokiwa, D. Aoki, 
H. Shishido, S. Ikeda, N. Watanabe, and Y. Onuki, 
Phys. Rev. B 63, 060503 (2001) 

[22] H. Shishido, R. Settai, D. Aoki, S. Ikeda, H. Nakawaki, 

N. Nakamura, T. lizuka, Y. Inada, K. Sugiyama, 
T. Takeuchi, K. Kindo, T. Kobayashi, Y. Haga, 
H. Harima, Y. Aoki, T. Namiki, H. Sato, and Y. Onuki, 

J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 162 (2002) 

[23] D. Hall, T. P. Murphy, E. C. Palm, S. W. Tozer, Z. Fisk, 
N. Harrison, R. G. Goodrich, U. Alver, and J. L. Sarrao, 
Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 16, 3004 (2002) 

[24] T. Ueda, H. Shishido, S. Hashimoto, T. Okubo, M. Ya- 
mada, Y. Inada, R. Settai, H. Harima, A. Galatanu, 
E. Yamamoto, N. Nakamura, K. Sugiyama, T. Takeuchi, 

K. Kindo, T. Namiki, Y. Aoki, H. Sato, and Y. Onuki, 
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73, 649 (2004) 

[25] R. Jiang, D. Mou, C. Liu, X. Zhao, Y. Yao, 
H. Ryu, C. Petrovic, K.-M. Ho, and A. Kaminski, 
Phys. Rev. B 91, 165101 (2015) 

[26] K. Koepernik and H. Eschrig, 

Phys. Rev. B 59, 1743 (1999) 

[27] D. Shoenberg, Magnetic oscillations in metals (Cam¬ 
bridge University Press, 1984). 

[28] A. Polyakov, O. Ignatchik, B. Bergk, K. Gotze, 
A. D. Bianchi, S. Blackburn, B. Prevost, G. Sey- 
farth, M. Cote, D. Hurt, C. Capan, Z. Fisk, R. G. 
Goodrich, I. Sheikin, M. Richter, and J. Wosnitza, 
Phys. Rev. B 85, 245119 (2012) 

[29] H. Shishido, R. Settai, H. Harima, and Y. Onuki, 
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1103 (2005) 

[30] H. Hegger, C. Petrovic, E. G. Moshopoulou, M. F. 
Hundley, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thompson, 
Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4986 (2000) 

[31] C. Petrovic, R. Movshovich, M. Jaime, P. G. Pagliuso, 
M. F. Hundley, J. L. Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thomp¬ 
son, Europhys. Lett. 53, 354 (2001) 

[32] M. Matsumoto, M. J. Han, J. Otsuki, and S. Y. 
Savrasov, Phys. Rev. B 82, 180515 (2010) 

[33] G.-q. Zheng, N. Yamaguchi, H. Kan, Y. Kitaoka, J. L. 










































6 


Sarrao, P. G. Pagliuso, N. O. Moreno, and J. D. Thomp¬ 
son, Phys. Rev. B 70, 014511 (2004) 

[34] J. L. Sarrao, L. A. Morales, J. D. Thompson, B. L. Scott, 
G. R. Stewart, F. Wastin, J. Rebizant, P. Boulet, E. Go- 
lineau, and G. H. Lander, Nature 420, 297 (2002). 

[35] T. Maehira, T. Hotta, K. Ueda, and A. Hasegawa, 
Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207007 (2003) 

[36] Q. Si, J. H. Pixley, E. Nica, S. J. Ya¬ 


mamoto, P. Goswami, R. Yu, and S. Kirchner, 
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 061005 (2014) 

[37] Q. Si, Physica B 378-380, 23 (2006) 

[38] Q. Si, Phys. Status Solidi B 247, 476 (2010) 

[39] J. Gusters, K.-A. Lorenzer, M. Muller, A. Prokofiev, 
A. Sidorenko, H. Winkler, A. M. Strydom, Y. Shimura, 
T. Sakakibara, R. Yu, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, 
Nat. Mater. 11, 189 (2012)