Skip to main content

Full text of "LASCO and EIT Observations of Coronal Mass Ejections"

See other formats


LASCO and EIT Observations of Coronal Mass Ejections 



K. P. Dere 

Naval Research Laboratory, Code 7663, Washington DC 20375 

A. Vourlidas, P. Subramanian 
Center for Earth Observing and Space Research, Institute for Computational 
Sciences, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 

Proceedings of the YOHKOH 8th Anniversary International Symposium, "Explosive 
Phenomena in Solar and Space Plasma", Dec 6-8 1999, Sagamihara, Japan 

°: 

The LASCO and EIT instruments on the SOHO spacecraft have provided an 
unprecedented set of observations for studying the physics of coronal mass ejections 
|~t | ' (CMEs). They provide the ability to view the pre-event corona, the initiation of the 
■ CME and its evolution from the surface of the Sun through 30 R Q . An example of 
the capability of these instruments is provided in a description of a single event (Dere 
et al, 1997). During the first 2 years of operation of LASCO and EIT on SOHO, 
t-h | a substantial fraction, on the order of 25 to 50%, of the CMEs observed exhibited 
structure consistent with the ejection of a helical magnetic flux rope. An examples of 
(N) ■ these has been reported by Chen et al. (1997) and Dere et al. (1999). These events 
may be the coronal counterpart of magnetic clouds discussed by Burlaga et al. (1981) 
and Klein and Burlaga (1982). They analyzed observations of magnetic fields behind 
interplanetary shocks and deduced that the field topology was that of a helical flux 
Q_i' rope. 

Recently, we have explored a number of the consequences of the helical flux rope 
+3 . description of these types of CMEs. Vourlidas et al. (1999) examined the energetics of 
CMEs with data from the LASCO coronagraphs on SOHO. The LASCO observations 
provide fairly direct measurements of the mass, velocity and dimensions of CMEs. 
Using these basic measurements, we determined the potential and kinetic energies and 
their evolution for several CMEs that exhibited a flux-rope morphology. Assuming 
magnetic flux conservation ('frozen-in' fields), we used observations of the magnetic 
flux in a variety of magnetic clouds near the Earth to determine the magnetic flux 
and magnetic energy in CMEs near the Sun. Figure 1 shows these quantities for 
a few representative flux rope CMEs. In general, we find that the potential and 
kinetic energies increase at the expense of the magnetic energy as the CME moves 
out, keeping the total energy roughly constant. This demonstrates that flux rope 
CMEs are magnetically driven. Furthermore, since their total energy is constant, the 
flux rope parts of the CMEs can be considered to be a closed system above ~ 2 R & . 

Subramanian et al. (1999) examined images from LASCO to study the relation- 
ship of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) to coronal streamers. We wished to test the 



itPH 



1997/04/13 Energies 



1997/04/13 Mass & Speed 



iff 19 . 



10 28 . 




10 15 20 

Height (R s J 



1997/10/30 Energies 




4 6 8 10 12 14 16 
Height (R s J 



1998/02/04 Energies 





15 20 
Height (R S J 

1997/10/30 Mass & Speed 




6 8 10 12 14 
Height (R S J 

1998/02/04 Mass & Speed 

10 a= 3.70 mis 2 



g 10 



15 



10 



14 



}500 




6 8 10 12 14 16 18 
Height (R s J 



6 8 10 12 14 16 18 
Height (R S J 



Figure 1: On the left, the total (heavy line), potential (dashed line), kinetic (dot- 
dash line) and magnetic (full line) energies of three CMEs. On the right, their mass 
(diamonds) and velocity (asterisks). 



suggestion of Low (1996) that CMEs arise from flux ropes embedded in streamers 
near their base. It is expected that the CME eruption would lead to the disruption 
of the streamer. To date, this is the most extensive observational study of the rela- 
tion between CMEs and streamers. The data span a period of 2 years near sunspot 
minimum through a period of increased activity as sunspot numbers increased. We 
have used LASCO C2 coronagraph data which records Thomson scattered white light 
from coronal electrons at heights between 1.5 and 6R S . Synoptic maps of the coronal 
streamers have been constructed from C2 observations at a height of 2.5R S at the east 
and west limbs. We have superposed the corresponding positions of CMEs observed 
with the C2 coronagraph onto the synoptic maps. We identified the different kinds 
of signatures CMEs leave on the streamer structure at this height (2.5i? s ). We find 
four categories of CMEs with respect to their effect on streamers: 

1. CMEs that disrupt the streamer. 

2. CMEs that have no effect on the streamer, even though they are related to it. 

3. CMEs that create streamer-like structures. 

4. CMEs that are latitudinally displaced from the streamer. 

Figure 2 summarizes these results. CMEs in categories 3 and 4 are not related 
to the streamer structure. We therefore conclude that approximately 35% of the 
observed CMEs bear no relation to the pre-existing streamer, while 46% have no 
effect on the observed streamer, even though they appear to be related to it. 

Previous studies using SMM data (Hundhausen 1993) have made the general 
statement that CMEs are mostly associated with streamers and that they frequently 
disrupt it. Our conclusions thus significantly alters the prevalant paradigm about the 
relationship of CMEs to streamers. 

Subramanian and Dere (2000) have examined coronal transients observed on the 
solar disk in EIT 195 A images that correspond to coronal mass ejections observed 
by LASCO during the solar minimum phase of January 1996 through May 1998. The 
objective of the study is to gain an understanding of the source regions from which the 
CMEs observed in LASCO images emanate. We compare the CME source regions as 
discerned from EIT 195 A images with photospheric magnetograms from the MDI on 
SOHO and from NSO Kitt Peak, and also with BBSO Ha images. The overall results 
of our study suggest that a majority of the CME related transients observed in EIT 
195 A images are associated with active regions. We have carried out detailed case 
studies of 5 especially well observed events. These case studies suggest that active 
region CMEs are often associated with the emergence of parasitic polarities into 
fairly rapidly evolving active regions. CMEs associated with prominence eruptions, 
on the other hand, are typically associated with long lived active regions. Figure 3 
summarizes these results. 



Figure 2: The relationship of CMEs to streamers 




Figure 3: Coronal sources of CMEs 



References 

Chen, J., et al. 1997, ApJ, 338, L194 

Dere, K. P., et al, 1997, Solar Phys., 175, 601. 

Dere, K. P., Brueckner, G. E., Howard, R. A., Michels, D.J., Delaboudiniere, J. P., 

1999, ApJ, 516, 465. 
Burlaga, L., Sittler, E., Mariani, F., Schwenn, R., 1981, JGR, 86, 6673 
Klein, L. W., Burlaga, L. F., 1982, JGR, 87, 613 
Subramanian, P. and Dere, K.P., 2000, ApJ, in preparation 
Subramanian, P., Dere, K.P, Rich, N.B., Howard, R.A., 1999, JGR, 104, 22331 
Vourlidas, A., Subramanian, P., Dere, K.P., Howard, R.A., 2000, ApJ, in press