# Full text of "Heavy-light meson decay constants with N_f=3"

## See other formats

Heavy-light meson decay constants with Nf = 3 MILC Collaboration: C. Bernard? T. Burch b S. Dattaf C. DeTar, d Steven Gottlieb?* E. Gregory, 6 Urs M. Heller f R. Sugar 8 and D. Toussaint b a Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA b Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA c Department of Physics, Universitat Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany d Physics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA °Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA f CSIT, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4130, USA g Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA During the past year the MILC Collaboration has continued its study of heavy-light meson decay constants with three dynamical quarks. Calculations have been extended to a second lattice spacing of about 0.09 fm. At this lattice spacing, there are results in the quenched approximation and for three sets of dynamical quark mass: mi = m s ; mi = 0Am s and m; = 0.2m s , where mi is the light mass for the u and d quarks and m s is the strange quark mass. At the coarser lattice spacing, for which results were presented at Lattice 2001, statistics have been increased for two sets of quark masses and three additional sets of quark masses have been studied, giving a total of eight combinations used to interpolate between the quenched and chiral limits. When these calculations are completed, we can study the decay constants taking into account both chiral and continuum extrapolations. 1. INTRODUCTION We are extending a calculation of heavy-light meson decay constants with three flavors of dy- namical quarks that was begun last year fjl]. In addition to increasing statistics on some runs, we have additional mass combinations for a = 0.13 fm and new dynamical quark runs with a = 0.09 fm. Runs for the coarser lattice spacing are com- pleted, but running will continue for the finer lat- tice spacing, so that we can begin to understand the continuum limit. Dynamical gauge configurations are generated using the Asqtad action pi. For the heavy- light mesons, we use tadpole-improved clover valence quarks and operators that are improved accord- ing to the Fermilab formalism For each en- semble of dynamical quark configurations, we use five light and five heavy valence quark masses. * presented by S. Gottlieb The masses and decay constants are interpolated or extrapolated as explained below to get physi- cally relevant values with the overall scale set by the p mass. 2. PROGRESS SINCE LATTICE 01 Last year we had completed running for a — 0.13 fm on quenched configurations, on a two fla- vor ensemble, and for four combinations of light and strange quark dynamical masses. A fraction of another set was run. We have now completed eight sets of dynamical masses with a — 0.13 fm. Our quenched run for a = 0.09 fm included about 15% of the configurations there, and we were gen- erating configurations with two sets of dynamical masses. We soon completed analysis of every- other quenched lattice and have made substan- tial progress on three dynamical ensembles. The table below contains a summary of our running. 2 dynamical (3 configs. configs. am Ut d/ am s generated analyzed ft — 0.13 fin; 20 3 x 64 oo/oo 8.00 408 290 0.02/oo 7.20 411 411 0.40/0.40 7.35 332 324 0.20/0.20 7.15 341 341 0.10/0.10 6.96 340 340 0.05/0.05 6.85 425 425 0.04/0.05 6.83 351 347 0.03/0.05 6.81 564 563 0.02/0.05 6.79 486 486 0.01/0.05 6.76 407 399 a = 0.09 fm; 28 3 x 96 oo/oo 8.40 417 200 0.031/0.031 7.18 336 163 0.0124/0.031 7.11 370 120 0.0062/0.031 7.09 176 48 o data - lin. fit, CL=0 11 quad, fit, CL = 0.95 J? - extrap to m ud or m s -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 valence am q Figure 1. Crural extrapolation of fs showing both linear and non-linear fits for (3 — 6.79, kq = 0.08. 3. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS The analysis of the heavy-light decay constants involves a number of steps: 1. fit light pseudoscalar masses 2. perform chiral fit of pseudoscalar masses to determine k c 3. fit light vector meson masses 4. perform chiral fit of vector meson masses and determine m u ^ and a to get physical jm p and m p 5. determine m s from mass of ss pseudoscalar state assuming linear chiral mass relation 6. fit heavy-light channels to determine masses and decay amplitudes 7. extrapolate or interpolate results in light quark mass to m uc i or m s , respectively (see Fig. 1). One can see that the confidence level of the nonlinear fit is much better than that of the linear fit. The curvature of the former has the same sign as that expected from chiral log- arithms as recently suggested 0; however, our data has considerably less curvature than the low- est order chiral logarithms would predict, requir- ing higher-order terms and, perhaps, a modifica- tion of the logarithms due to 'taste' breaking or partial quenching. 8. after removal of perturbative logarithms, fit fQq\Z m Qq to a power series in l/rriQ q and inter- polate to B, B s , D and D s meson masses 9. put the perturbative logarithm back and use the heavy-light axial- vector current renormal- ization constant to get the renormalized decay- constant Unfortunately, the axial- vector renormalization constant has not yet been calculated either per- turbatively or nonpcrturbatively. We assume that in the quenched approximation our current results at a — 0.13 fm with an improved action agree with the continuum limit of our previous calculation using Wilson and clover quarks and the Wilson gauge action. This was explained in more detail in Ref. ||. After the above procedure is done on each en- semble, we have a partially quenched result at a particular value of dynamical m^/mp. We then plot these results as a function of (m v /m p ) 2 to perform a chiral extrapolation. This is demon- strated for Jb in Fig. 2. It is worthwhile to plot the ratio of B s and B meson decay constants since many of the system- atic errors are common, and a good deal of the 3 240 220 > S 200 180 160 0.0 □ N F =3, a=0.13 fm - w N F =3, a=0.09 fm - X extraps. of □ ~_ o N F =2, a=0.13 fm y o quench, a = 0.13 fm- * quench, a = 0.09 fm- [] [] 0.5 1.0 dynamical (m^/m )' Figure 2. f B as a function of (m^/mp) 2 1.30 1.25 — 1.20 1.15 — [] □ N F =3, a = 0.13 fm k N F =3, a = 0.09 fm ~ N F =2, a = 0.13 fm - o quench, a = 0.13 fm— * quench, a = 0.09 fm" — const fit, CL=0.40 " 5!s extrap. value □ □ 1.10 0.5 1.0 dynamical (m /m ) 2 Figure 3. JbJ fs as a function of (mj]m p y uncertainty from the renormalization constants r i /.quench JBl J B Sb IbJIb drops out. Figure 3 shows the ratio along with prelim, result 1.23 1.18 a constant chiral extrapolation in the dynamical stat. error 3% 3% 1% mass. val. x Bxtr. err. 3% 3% _ /o dyn. x extr. err. 2% 2% < 1% 4. CONCLUSIONS perturb, err. 2% ?? «1% discret. err. <3% 3%? <1% Our preliminary three flavor results and er- ror estimates are slightly changed from last year. With higher statistics the quenched results at the finer lattice spacing are in good agreement with the coarser spacing for the B mesons. We find: W/B UenCh [ m p scale ] 1.23(4)(6), / s .// fl = 1.18(1X1?). If we take the MILC continuum quenched value (m p scale) for Jb (169 MeV) as given, our value /s//s UCnch = 1-23 gives f B « 207 MeV with 2+1 flavors. An independent determination of fg awaits the calculation of the axial current renor- malization factor. The errors are detailed in the table below. Better understanding of the chiral logs is neces- sary and may change the fg chiral extrapolation beyond the error estimated here. REFERENCES 1. C. Bernard, et at, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 106, 412 (2002). 2. T. Blum, et al, Phys. Rev. D55, R1133 (1997); J. Lagae and D. Sinclair, Phys. Rev. D59, 104511 (1998); G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev. D59, 074502 (1999); K. Orginos, D. Tou- ssaint and R.L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. D60, 054503 (1999); C. Bernard, et al, Phys. Rev. D61, 111502(R) (2000). 3. A. El-Khadra, A. Kronfeld and P. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D55, 3933 (1997). 4. N. Yamada, et al., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 106, 3 97 (2002); A.S Kronfeld and S.M. Ryan, |hep-ph/0206058| ; N. Yamada, these proceedings.