Heavy-light meson decay constants with Nf = 3
MILC Collaboration: C. Bernard? T. Burch b S. Dattaf C. DeTar, d Steven Gottlieb?* E. Gregory, 6
Urs M. Heller f R. Sugar 8 and D. Toussaint b
a
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
b Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
c Department of Physics, Universitat Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
d Physics Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
°Department of Physics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA
f CSIT, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4130, USA
g Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA
During the past year the MILC Collaboration has continued its study of heavy-light meson decay constants
with three dynamical quarks. Calculations have been extended to a second lattice spacing of about 0.09 fm. At
this lattice spacing, there are results in the quenched approximation and for three sets of dynamical quark mass:
mi = m s ; mi = 0Am s and m; = 0.2m s , where mi is the light mass for the u and d quarks and m s is the strange
quark mass. At the coarser lattice spacing, for which results were presented at Lattice 2001, statistics have been
increased for two sets of quark masses and three additional sets of quark masses have been studied, giving a total
of eight combinations used to interpolate between the quenched and chiral limits. When these calculations are
completed, we can study the decay constants taking into account both chiral and continuum extrapolations.
1. INTRODUCTION
We are extending a calculation of heavy-light
meson decay constants with three flavors of dy-
namical quarks that was begun last year fjl]. In
addition to increasing statistics on some runs, we
have additional mass combinations for a = 0.13
fm and new dynamical quark runs with a = 0.09
fm. Runs for the coarser lattice spacing are com-
pleted, but running will continue for the finer lat-
tice spacing, so that we can begin to understand
the continuum limit.
Dynamical gauge configurations are generated
using the Asqtad action pi. For the heavy- light
mesons, we use tadpole-improved clover valence
quarks and operators that are improved accord-
ing to the Fermilab formalism For each en-
semble of dynamical quark configurations, we use
five light and five heavy valence quark masses.
* presented by S. Gottlieb
The masses and decay constants are interpolated
or extrapolated as explained below to get physi-
cally relevant values with the overall scale set by
the p mass.
2. PROGRESS SINCE LATTICE 01
Last year we had completed running for a —
0.13 fm on quenched configurations, on a two fla-
vor ensemble, and for four combinations of light
and strange quark dynamical masses. A fraction
of another set was run. We have now completed
eight sets of dynamical masses with a — 0.13 fm.
Our quenched run for a = 0.09 fm included about
15% of the configurations there, and we were gen-
erating configurations with two sets of dynamical
masses. We soon completed analysis of every-
other quenched lattice and have made substan-
tial progress on three dynamical ensembles. The
table below contains a summary of our running.
2
dynamical (3 configs. configs.
am Ut d/ am s generated analyzed
ft —
0.13 fin; 20 3 x 64
oo/oo
8.00
408
290
0.02/oo
7.20
411
411
0.40/0.40
7.35
332
324
0.20/0.20
7.15
341
341
0.10/0.10
6.96
340
340
0.05/0.05
6.85
425
425
0.04/0.05
6.83
351
347
0.03/0.05
6.81
564
563
0.02/0.05
6.79
486
486
0.01/0.05
6.76
407
399
a =
0.09 fm; 28 3 x 96
oo/oo
8.40
417
200
0.031/0.031
7.18
336
163
0.0124/0.031
7.11
370
120
0.0062/0.031
7.09
176
48
o data
- lin. fit, CL=0
11
quad, fit, CL
= 0.95 J?
- extrap to m ud
or m s
-0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
valence am q
Figure 1. Crural extrapolation of fs showing
both linear and non-linear fits for (3 — 6.79,
kq = 0.08.
3. ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
The analysis of the heavy-light decay constants
involves a number of steps:
1. fit light pseudoscalar masses
2. perform chiral fit of pseudoscalar masses to
determine k c
3. fit light vector meson masses
4. perform chiral fit of vector meson masses and
determine m u ^ and a to get physical jm p and
m p
5. determine m s from mass of ss pseudoscalar
state assuming linear chiral mass relation
6. fit heavy-light channels to determine masses
and decay amplitudes
7. extrapolate or interpolate results in light
quark mass to m uc i or m s , respectively (see
Fig. 1). One can see that the confidence level
of the nonlinear fit is much better than that of
the linear fit. The curvature of the former has
the same sign as that expected from chiral log-
arithms as recently suggested 0; however, our
data has considerably less curvature than the low-
est order chiral logarithms would predict, requir-
ing higher-order terms and, perhaps, a modifica-
tion of the logarithms due to 'taste' breaking or
partial quenching.
8. after removal of perturbative logarithms, fit
fQq\Z m Qq to a power series in l/rriQ q and inter-
polate to B, B s , D and D s meson masses
9. put the perturbative logarithm back and
use the heavy-light axial- vector current renormal-
ization constant to get the renormalized decay-
constant
Unfortunately, the axial- vector renormalization
constant has not yet been calculated either per-
turbatively or nonpcrturbatively. We assume
that in the quenched approximation our current
results at a — 0.13 fm with an improved action
agree with the continuum limit of our previous
calculation using Wilson and clover quarks and
the Wilson gauge action. This was explained in
more detail in Ref. ||.
After the above procedure is done on each en-
semble, we have a partially quenched result at a
particular value of dynamical m^/mp. We then
plot these results as a function of (m v /m p ) 2 to
perform a chiral extrapolation. This is demon-
strated for Jb in Fig. 2.
It is worthwhile to plot the ratio of B s and B
meson decay constants since many of the system-
atic errors are common, and a good deal of the
3
240
220
>
S 200
180
160
0.0
□ N F =3, a=0.13 fm -
w N F =3, a=0.09 fm -
X extraps. of □ ~_
o N F =2, a=0.13 fm y
o quench, a = 0.13 fm-
* quench, a = 0.09 fm-
[]
[]
0.5
1.0
dynamical (m^/m )'
Figure 2. f B as a function of (m^/mp) 2
1.30
1.25 —
1.20
1.15 —
[]
□ N F =3, a = 0.13 fm
k N F =3, a = 0.09 fm ~
N F =2, a = 0.13 fm -
o quench, a = 0.13 fm—
* quench, a = 0.09 fm"
— const fit, CL=0.40 "
5!s extrap. value
□ □
1.10
0.5
1.0
dynamical (m /m ) 2
Figure 3. JbJ fs as a function of (mj]m p y
uncertainty from the renormalization constants
r i /.quench
JBl J B
Sb
IbJIb
drops out. Figure 3 shows the ratio along with
prelim, result
1.23
1.18
a constant chiral extrapolation in the dynamical
stat. error
3%
3%
1%
mass.
val. x Bxtr. err.
3%
3%
_ /o
dyn. x extr. err.
2%
2%
< 1%
4. CONCLUSIONS
perturb, err.
2%
??
«1%
discret. err.
<3%
3%?
<1%
Our preliminary three flavor results and er-
ror estimates are slightly changed from last year.
With higher statistics the quenched results at the
finer lattice spacing are in good agreement with
the coarser spacing for the B mesons. We find:
W/B UenCh [ m p scale ]
1.23(4)(6),
/ s .// fl = 1.18(1X1?).
If we take the MILC continuum quenched value
(m p scale) for Jb (169 MeV) as given, our value
/s//s UCnch = 1-23 gives f B « 207 MeV with
2+1 flavors. An independent determination of fg
awaits the calculation of the axial current renor-
malization factor. The errors are detailed in the
table below.
Better understanding of the chiral logs is neces-
sary and may change the fg chiral extrapolation
beyond the error estimated here.
REFERENCES
1. C. Bernard, et at, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.
106, 412 (2002).
2. T. Blum, et al, Phys. Rev. D55, R1133
(1997); J. Lagae and D. Sinclair, Phys. Rev.
D59, 104511 (1998); G.P. Lepage, Phys. Rev.
D59, 074502 (1999); K. Orginos, D. Tou-
ssaint and R.L. Sugar, Phys. Rev. D60,
054503 (1999); C. Bernard, et al, Phys. Rev.
D61, 111502(R) (2000).
3. A. El-Khadra, A. Kronfeld and P. Mackenzie,
Phys. Rev. D55, 3933 (1997).
4. N. Yamada, et al., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.
106, 3 97 (2002); A.S Kronfeld and S.M.
Ryan, |hep-ph/0206058| ; N. Yamada, these
proceedings.
