Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09870801"

See other formats


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 : 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


v,-'h'.!'3i.M-^l 

ERIC L. WESENBERG (State Bar No. 139696) ' 1 : 

SAM O'ROURKE (State Bar No. 205233) ft;;y a ? 

ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLEFFE LLP 
1000 Marsh Road k: 
Menlo Park CA 94025 v C : , 

Telephone: (650)614-7400 . 
Facsimile: (650)614-7401 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant 
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 


RECEIVED 

y/ ^5CT 2 8 2002 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

RICHARD w WIEKING NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 
CLERK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT 
W0RTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 


INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, 

Plaintiff, 


MICROSOFT CORPORATION, a 
Washington corporation, 

Defendant. 


AND RELATED CROSS-ACTION. 


Case No. C 01-1640 SBA (MEJ) 

[P gO ge SED ] ORDER GRANTING, 
IN PART, MICROSOFT'S MOTION 
FOR A PARTIAL STAY 


D0CSSV1:2IM54.2 


PROPOSED ORDER 
C 01-1640 SBA (MEJ) 


1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 
10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 


Having considered Defendant Microsoft's Motion for Partial Stay, the supporting 
and opposing papers, the pleadings and papers on file with the Court, the evidence presented by 
counsel, oral argument by counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Microsoft's motion is GRANTED, IN PART, AS 

FOLLOWS: 

The parties have selected the following 12 claims for limited Markman claim 
construction and indefiniteness proceedings: 

■ U.S. Patent No. 6,185,683 - claim 2 

- U.S. Patent No. 6,253,193 -claims 1, 11, 15, 19 

■ U.S. Patent No. 5,920,861 -claim 58 

• ■ U.S. Patent No. 5,892,900 -claim 155 

■ U.S. Patent No. 5,982,891- claim 1 

■ U.S.PatentNo.5,917,912-claims8,35 

■ U.S. Patent No. 6,157,721 - claims 1, 34 

The Court shall schedule the hearing on Microsoft's anticipated motion for partial 
summary judgment of indefiniteness (limited to all or some of these 12 claims) to coincide with 
the Marlon an hearing on these 12 claims. 

All proceedings (including all discovery) unrelated to the claim construction and 
alleged indefiniteness of these 12 claims shall be stayed pending the Court's ruling on these 
issues. 

The relatedness of disr™"*y ™giipsts tn the limited Markman and indefiniteness 
proceedings shall be construed broadly and both parties are ordered to make every effort to permit 
discovery, otherwise relevant and discoverable under the Civil Rules, that is colorably related to 
or likely to assist in developing issues affecting the claim construction and/or indefiniteness of the 
12 claims selected by the parties. For example, at the hearing counsel represented that they 
would not object to discovery directed to the use, by either parry, of claim terms selected to be 
construed at the limited Markman hearing, as well as technical documents mentioning .those claim 
terms. However, the failure to object to such discovery shall not be construed as an admission of 

1 PROPOSED ORDER 

DOCSSV12104542 _1 " C0M640SBA(MEJ) 


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 


the admissibility or relevance of that material, nor shall it be considered a waiver of the right to 
contest its admissibility for any purpose. 

This partial stay is granted pursuant to the Court's broad powers of case 
management, including the power to limit discovery to relevant subject matter and to adjust 
discovery as appropriate to each phase of litigation as set forth by the Federal Circuit in Vivid 
Technologies, Inc. v. American Science & Engineering, Inc., 200 F.3d 795, 803 (Fed. Cir. 1999), 
and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b), (c); 26(b); 42(b). 
Dated: //-/ , 2002 

/T^eHono^ 


D0CSSVl:21W54.2 


-2- 


PROPOSED ORDER 
C 01-1640 SBA (MET) 


1 

2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
8 
9 

10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 
18 
19 
20 
21 
22 
23 
24 
25 
26 
27 
28 


DECLARATION OF SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND U.S. MAIL 

I am more than eighteen years old and not a party to this action. My place of 
employment and business address is 1000 Marsh Road, Menlo Park, California 94025. 

On November 6, 2002, 1 served: 
ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MICROSOFT'S MOTION FOR A PARTIAL STAY 

By transmitting a copy of the above-listed document(s) in PDF form via electronic mail Michael 
H. Page at mhp@kvn.com, Steven H. Morrissett at steven.morrissett@finnegan.com, 
Stephen E. Taylor at stayIor@tcolaw.com and James E. Geringer at 
james.geringer@klarquist.com and also by placing true and correct copies of the above 
documents in an envelope addressed to: 


John W. Keker, Esq. 
Michael H. Page, Esq. 
KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP 
710 Sansome Street 
San Francisco, California 941 1 1 
Tel. No. 415-391-5400 
Fax No. 415-397-7188 
Email: mhp@kvn.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff INTERTRUST 
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION 


Stephen E. Taylor, Esq. 

TAYLOR & CO. LAW OFFICES 

1050 Marina Village Parkway, Suite 101 

Alameda, CA 94501 

Tel. No. 510-865-9401 

Fax No. 510-865-9408 

Email: staylor@tcolaw.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION 


Steven H. Morrissett, Esq. 

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, 

GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 

Stanford Research Park 

700 Hansen Way 

Palo Alto, California 94304-1016 

Tel. No. 650-849-6624 

Fax No. 650-849-6666 

Email: steven.morrissett@finnegan.com 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 
INTERTRUST TECHNOLOGIES 
CORPORATION 

John D. Vandenberg, Esq. 

James E. Geringer, Esq. 

KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, LLP 

One World Trade Center 

121 S. W. Salmon Street, Suite 1600 

Portland, Oregon 97204 

Tel. No: 503-226-7391 

Fax No: 503-228-9446 

Email: j ames.geringer@klarquist.com 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 


and sealing the envelope, affixing adequate first-class postage and depositing it in the U.S. mail 
at Menlo Park, California. 

Executed on November 6, 2002 at Menlo Park, California. 

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 


ANNA FREDDIE 


DOCSSVl:! 89299.1 


DECLARATION OF SERVICE VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND 
U.S. MAIL — CASE NO. C 01- 1 640 SBA(MEJ)