Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 09998152"

See other formats


sue? 




PATENT 



IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 



nit: 2168 



Ixaminer: Greta Lee Robinson 



METHODS AND SYSTEMS 
FOR AUTOMATED DATA 



COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 
FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH 
ASSET SECURITIZATION 



In re Application of: Donald P. Coleman 
Serial No. 09/998,152 
Filed: November 30, 2001 

Commissioner for Patents 
P.O. Box: 1450 
Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 



"Express Mail" label number EB61 662903 3US 

Date of Deposit September 27. 2007 

I hereby certify that the following attached paper or fee 

COMMUNICATION IN RESPONSE TO OFFICE COMMUNICATION 
MAILED AUGUST 27, 2007 CONCERNING APPLICATION PROCEEDING 

is being deposited with the United States Postal Service "Express Mail Post Office to Addressee" 
service under 37 CFR 1.10 on the date indicated above and is addressed to: Commissioner for Patents, 
P.O. Box: 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 



EXPRESS MAIL CERTIFICATE 



Beth H. Retort 




PI-1853725 vl 0237710-00102 




PATENT 
010520 



IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 



t: 2168 



Examiner: Greta Lee Robinson 



In re Application of: Donald P. Coleman 
Serial No. 09/998,152 
Filed: November 30, 2001 



METHODS AND SYSTEMS 
FOR AUTOMATED DATA 
COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS 
FOR USE IN ASSOCIATION WITH 
ASSET SECURITIZATION 



COMMUNICATION IN RESPONSE TO OFFICE COMMUNICATION 
MAILED AUGUST 27. 2007 CONCERNING APPLICATION PROCEEDING 



September 27, 2007 



Commissioner for Patents 
Box 1450 

Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 



Dear Commissioner: 



In response to the Office Communication mailed August 27, 2007, with a response 
due within one-month, please reconsider the above-identified application in view of the 
following remarks. Applicant respectfully requests that the response filed June 12, 2007 be 
reconsidered because it is fully responsive and it places the application in condition for 
allowance. 

In regard to the Communication mailed on August 27, 2007, the Office contends that 
the response filed on June 12, 2007 is not fully responsive to the prior Office Action because 
of the following omission(s) or matter(s), in relevant part: 



1741442-vl