Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 10670332"

See other formats


United States Patent and Trademark Office 



UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 
I nilid Stall-, Patent and Trademark Office 

Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS 



APPLICATION NO. 



FILING DATE 



FIRST NAMED INVENTOR 



ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 



10/070.332 



09/20/2003 



2292 7590 04/01/2009 

BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH 
PO BOX 747 

FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747 



DAMELSEN, NATHAN ANDREW 



PAPER NUMBER 



NOTIFICATION DATE | DELIVERY MODE 
04/01/2009 ELECTRONIC 



Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. 

The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. 

Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the 

following e-mail address(es): 

mailroom@bskb.com 



PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) 



Interview Summary 


Application No. 

10/670,332 


Applicant(s) 
PARK ET AL. 


Examiner 

Nathan Danielsen 


Art Unit 

2627 





All participants (applicant, applicant's representative, PTO personnel): 



(1) Nathan Danielsen . (3) . 

(2) Seth Kim (Reg. #54,557) . (4) . 

Date of Interview: 24 March 2009 . 

Type: a)^ Telephonic b)^ Video Conference 

c)D Personal [copy given to: "!)□ applicant 2)Q applicant's representative] 

Exhibit shown or demonstration conducted: d)D Yes e)Q No. 
If Yes, brief description: . 

Claim(s) discussed: 1,21 and 36 . 

Identification of prior art discussed: Ito et al (US Patent 5.715,221) . 

Agreement with respect to the claims f)^] was reached. g)D was not reached. h)D N/A. 



Substance of Interview including description of the general nature of what was agreed to if an agreement was 
reached, or any other comments: applicant's representative presented claim amendments and arguments (filed 27 
February 2009) which at least appear to overcome the prior art applied against the claims in the Office action mailed 
28 November 2008. Applicant's representative was then informed that further search and consideration would be 
necessary to confirm that applicant's amendments have overcome the applied prior art . 

(A fuller description, if necessary, and a copy of the amendments which the examiner agreed would render the claims 
allowable, if available, must be attached. Also, where no copy of the amendments that would render the claims 
allowable is available, a summary thereof must be attached.) 

THE FORMAL WRITTEN REPLY TO THE LAST OFFICE ACTION MUST INCLUDE THE SUBSTANCE OF THE 
INTERVIEW. (See MPEP Section 713.04). If a reply to the last Office action has already been filed, APPLICANT IS 
GIVEN A NON-EXTENDABLE PERIOD OF THE LONGER OF ONE MONTH OR THIRTY DAYS FROM THIS 
INTERVIEW DATE, OR THE MAILING DATE OF THIS INTERVIEW SUMMARY FORM, WHICHEVER IS LATER, TO 
FILE A STATEMENT OF THE SUBSTANCE OF THE INTERVIEW. See Summary of Record of Interview 
requirements on reverse side or on attached sheet. 



/Andrea L Wellington/ 

Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2627 



PTOL-413 (Rev. 04-03) 



Interview Summary 



sr No. 20090324