Skip to main content

Full text of "On a difference in the dimensions of photospherical granules in the vicinity and far from the sunspot penumbra"

See other formats


S-. 



p 



/6 2-//^^^ 



MSA TT F-8322 



ON A DIFFERENCE IN TBE DIMENSIONS OF PHOTOSPHERIGAl 

GRANULES IN THE YICINITI AND FAR FROM 'EHE 

SMSPOT PENUMBRA 



by 
C. J. Maoris 
T* J, Prokakis 

(FEANGE) 




W 71- 71283 



S (ACCESSION NUMBER) 

i ^ 



(PAGES) 



5 / ^^-^ ^ 

^ (NASA tROR TMX OR AD NUMBER) 



(THRU) 



A^dh^_ . 



(CODE) 



(CATEGORY) 



NATIONAL JffiRONATJTICS 11© SPACE ADMINISTRATION 
WASHINGTON 107EMEER 1962 



DRAFT TEAN3LATI0U NASA TT F-8322 

NOV 2 61962 



ON A DIFFEEENCE IN THE DIMENSIONS OF PHQTQSPHEBICAL 

GRANTEiES IN THE VICINITY AND FAB FROM TEE 

SUNSPOT PENUMBRA * 

(FRANCE) 

Comptes Rendus A«Sc« by C, J. Maoris 

T.255, No, 16, pp.1862-^ T* J* Prokakis 

15 October 1962, Paris. 

(Presented by M* Andre Danjon) 

Abstract / /^^ ^ 

A difference is noted between the dimensions of photo- 
spherical granules measured in the vicinity and far from the 
penumbra of sunspots. This phenomenofL is attributed to the effect 
of the magnetic field of the spots* - ^^ 

* 

One of us Cl3 found some years ago that the dimensions 
of photospherical granules are smaller in the vicinity of the 
penumbra of sunspots than those measured far from the spots. 
The cause of this difference in dimensions was attributed to the 
peculiar conditions existing in the 'vicinity of the spots, due to 
thermal gradients and more particularly to the intensity of the 
magnetic field. Dollfus [2] attributed that difference to intense 
radial magnetic fields, just as A. E* Danielson did C3l when uti- 
lizing photographs taken by the stratoscope and finding smaller 
dimensions for the granules in certain regions in the vicinity of 
a sunspot . 

Working on solar granulation with the aid of a Gautier 
refractor of kO cm aperture at the National Observatory of Athens, 



* Sur une difference des dimensions des granules photospheriques 
au voisinage at loin de* la penombre des taches solaires. 



\ 



z. 



we found on good quality photos very pronounced differences of 
character above in granule dimensions* In order to study this pheno- 
menon relative .to sunj^pot structure and to the intensity of their 

I 
magnetic fields ,-^e have selected four negatives sonong the best 

taken with the aid of the above-mentioned device by M« G» Banos, 
whose data are compiled briefly in Table 1 hereafter : 



TABLE I 



Fo. 


Date i960 


ITrT. 


Filter 
(i) 


Heliographic 
coordinates 


Emulsion 


1 


31 May 


O6li44»30" 


6000 


IQS -32 W 


Duplopan- 


2 


22 Sept 


06 14 24 


5250 


20S-13W 


Gevaert 


3 


22 Sept 


06 00 56 


5250 


19S-25E 


II 


4 


22 Nov, 


08 05 45 


6000 


7N-17W 


ri 



The magnetic field intensity of the above simspot groups 
was communicated to us by the Potsdam andoMountvpilson Observato- 
ries. The dimensions of granules were measured in the selected 
regions on the first negatives with the aid of observatory.^s 
Eidell measuring device. 

IToted in the Figures 1 and 2 the regions where the dimensions 
of photospherical granules were measured: a and b refer to measure- 
ments made in the vicinity of spot penumbra and c — to those made 
far from it# On the photos 5 and h^ a and c point to regions in 
which measurements were respectively effected in the vicinity and 
far from the penumbra. The spots' magnetic field intensities and 
the results of measurements of granule dimensions are given in 
Table II (next page). These data allow the following conclusions : 

The dimensions of photospherical granules in the vicinity 
of sunspots of complex structure and with intense magnetic fields 
are smaller than those measured far from the spots. 



3. 







TABLE 


II 




Groupe - Date 


Magnetic field 


Difference 


Mean 


Comments 




intensity 


in grsmule 
dimensions 


error 




1. (31 May) 


Mt. Wilson 


G — a = 0"51 


+0"10 


Complex struct. 




S 2200 G 


^ c - b = 0"43 


+0"l6 


group 




for 30, 7 May -^ 








2. (22 Sep) 


Potsdam 


c - a = 0"84 


0"22 


Remarkable compl 




S2300-N2700 G 
(for 22, h Sep) 


c - b =0"69 


0"19 


structure group 
two nuclei of 
opposed magnet, 
polarity in the 
same penumbra. 


3. (22 Sep) 


Potsdam 

S 2500 G 

(for 22, 4 Sep) 


c - a = 0"21 


0"12 


Unipolar spot 
of small surf. 


4. (22 ITov) 


Mt .Wilson 

N 1500 G, 

(for 20, 3 Nov) 

Potsdam 

N 2500 G 

(for 24, 5 Nov) 


c — a = 0"06 


0"l8 


Unipolar spot 
of small surf • 



The dimensions of photospherical granules in the vicinity 
of unipolar sunspot penumbra show to the contrary very small differen- 
ces relative to the dimensions measured far from spots, even if they 
present intense magnetic fields ♦ 

It is quite probable that this difference in the dimension 
of granules in the vicinity and far from the pentimbra of . apots of 
complex structure (bipolar and multipolar groups) is due to the shape 
of magnetic fields and their intensity repartitite* The nonexistence 
of appreciable differences between the dimensions of granules measured 
near and far from the penumbra of unipolar spots may be explained by 



h. 




Fig.l 



Fig. 2 



the fact that, acceirding to tlie law of variation of magnetic field 
intensity in simple and isolated spots, the latter becomes zero 
at about the limit of the penumbra and of the photosphere* 

***j| THE EKD **«* 
KBFEEENCES 

1* C. MAORIS , Ann.Astrophys, l6, No. 1, p. 10, 1953. 

2. A« DOLLFUS . Astronomie, p, if22, Oct-November 1959. 

3. H. E. DANIELSOIT , Ap. J. 25^, No. 2, p. 28?, September I961. 



Translated by ANDHE L* BEICHANT 
for the 

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 

25 November I962.